Jump to content

User talk:APK/Archive 28

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30Archive 32

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

The article Major General George Henry Thomas you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Major General George Henry Thomas for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 14:42, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Major General George Henry Thomas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Major General George Henry Thomas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Major General George B. McClellan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Major General George B. McClellan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Major General George B. McClellan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 20:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Major General George B. McClellan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Major General George B. McClellan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

The article Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Unitarian Universalist Church of Arlington for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 21:21, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Congrats on your third GA in the span of two days. Well done, Sir! :) - NeutralhomerTalk22:19, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Thanks! APK whisper in my ear 23:08, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


Suppressing Legitimate Information

Since when is negative information considered poor press on Wikipedia? The page you reverted multiple times was cited by more than 40 links to verified resources and claims that are also being verified. Why would you revive the edits on the page as written when it is, by itself, nothing more than self glorification Spam? This is important as you are actually assisting the individual in his actions. The page was selected for deletion two years ago because of this same situation. Why now revive one that is only an obvious smoke screen to push down legitimate reviews, complaints and press of the individual Joseph Chinnock. As I wrote before, all information within the page was cited accurately, yet you chopped it and kept a page that is cited off of the individual's personal blogs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reportingfakes (talkcontribs)

Read WP:BLP. You're adding defamatory content using unreliable sources. That is against Wikipedia policy. If you have a problem with this person, Wikipedia is not the place to deal with it. Take it elsewhere. I'll nominate the page for deletion since it was previously deleted, but do not continue adding defamatory material or you will be blocked. APK whisper in my ear 06:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocked by Materialscientist. APK whisper in my ear 06:18, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Museum hacks and museum edits

Hello there!

Upcoming events:

  • February 6–8: The third annual ArtBytes Hackathon at the Walters Art Museum! This year Wikimedia DC is partnering with the Walters for a hack-a-thon at the intersection of art and technology, and I would like to see Wikimedia well represented.
  • February 11: The monthly WikiSalon, same place as usual. RSVP on Meetup or just show up!
  • February 15: Wiki Loves Small Museums in Ocean City. Mary Mark Ockerbloom, with support from Wikimedia DC, will be leading a workshop at the Small Museum Association Conference on how they can contribute to Wikipedia. Tons of representatives from GLAM institutions will be present, and we are looking for volunteers. If you would like to help out, check out "Information for Volunteers".

I am also pleased to announce events for Wikimedia DC Black History Month with Howard University and NPR. Details on those events soon.

If you have any questions or have any requests, please email me at james.hare@wikimediadc.org.

See you there! – James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Brevet Lt. General Winfield Scott you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 14:40, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

The article Brevet Lt. General Winfield Scott you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Brevet Lt. General Winfield Scott for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia DC celebrates Black History Month, and more!

Hello again!

Not even a week ago I sent out a message talking about upcoming events in DC. Guess what? There are more events coming up in February.

First, as a reminder, there is a WikiSalon on February 11 (RSVP here or just show up) and Wiki Loves Small Museums at the Small Museum Association Conference on February 15 (more information here).

Now, I am very pleased to announce:

There is going to be a lot going on, and I hope you can come to some of the events!

If you have any questions or need any special accommodations, please let me know.


Regards,

James Hare


(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:19, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

The article Brevet Lt. General Winfield Scott you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Brevet Lt. General Winfield Scott for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! APK whisper in my ear 04:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Great work! I added an image and a few categories, if you don't mind. Looks like you may have another GA under your belt soon. Keep it up! ---Another Believer (Talk) 03:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you! APK whisper in my ear 04:24, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

A few things

Hi. I apparently haven't posted here since 2011. A few things:

  1. Welcome back! I meant to stop by and say so a few weeks ago.
  2. You're living in Virginia now?! My condolences. :P
  3. I love User:AgnosticPreachersKid/Dupont Circle and pretty much everything else you do around here.
  4. Thanks for the article save earlier today.

Bye. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:11, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome. It was an odd choice to be nominated for speedy deletion. Thanks for the welcome back. Things are...different (some good, some bad) around here for someone who has been away a few years. But it's nice to be back and write about random things in DC. Speaking of the District, yes, I no longer live there. I miss Dupont and Gomorrah (especially my favorite museum), but it's a lot cheaper to live out here and most people tend be very friendly. Plus, two words: Waffle House. APK whisper in my ear 20:31, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The Fallout of 1956

I nomintated the page for AfD to prevent further edit warring, obviously this page needs to be deleted, the AfD will help it stick. -War wizard90 (talk) 03:12, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. APK whisper in my ear 03:13, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I reported the user at AIV. Hopefully, action is taken sooner than later. APK whisper in my ear 03:14, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

Your GA nomination of George Gordon Meade Memorial

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article George Gordon Meade Memorial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 17:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Gordon Meade Memorial

The article George Gordon Meade Memorial you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:George Gordon Meade Memorial for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 17:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of George Gordon Meade Memorial

The article George Gordon Meade Memorial you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:George Gordon Meade Memorial for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of General John A. Rawlins

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article General John A. Rawlins you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 20:20, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of General John A. Rawlins

The article General John A. Rawlins you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:General John A. Rawlins for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 20:41, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of General John A. Rawlins

The article General John A. Rawlins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:General John A. Rawlins for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 15:01, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Pandura Royal College

The recently created article Royal College (Panadura.) should in fact be deleted rather than be a redirect, it is simply a replica of a previously deleted article Royal College (Panadura), which the use has added a colon to the title within the brackets, so that it doesn't appear as a recreation of a deleted article. It would appear that all this is simply to try and get around the fact that the user was orginally blocked for his edits on Panadura Royal College. Dan arndt (talk) 09:39, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

@Dan arndt: Ok. I redirected it before finding out the user was a sock. I've tagged it again, but feel free to change the reasoning if you think it's not correct. APK whisper in my ear 09:44, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Fully support the speedy delete however the editor has previously removed the tag twice without making any changes or contesting the speedy delete.Dan arndt (talk) 09:49, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Sheikh rattle and roll

If you see 'Sheikh Zaman' again, it's a G5. Multiple socking to try to get his article up. It's at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sheikh Zaman ll (that's small LL not 2 - caught me out when I added the one before this)). I've blocked, added, deleted and closed as appropriate. Just won't get the message that he's not wanted here. Not until he becomes notable. If... Peridon (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Sure thing. APK whisper in my ear 18:37, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
@Peridon:, he's a busy little thing. I came across another one, User Dj (talk · contribs). APK whisper in my ear 07:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
I see he blanked a page - perhaps he's starting to get the message? Peridon (talk) 11:02, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
@Peridon:, judging by the SPI case and its archive, I doubt it, but I could be wrong. BTW, you forgot to delete the talk page. :-) APK whisper in my ear 11:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
Done. Peridon (talk) 11:42, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

More abandoned User Pages Full of Porn

Could you check ANI for some more of these I have listed. I am not very familiar with the Speedy delete you tagged them with. Thanks 172.56.8.170 (talk) 13:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

A long conversation was started about this at ANI. It seems to have been handled by other users. APK whisper in my ear 19:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samuel Hahnemann Monument

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Samuel Hahnemann Monument you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 21:20, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samuel Hahnemann Monument

The article Samuel Hahnemann Monument you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Samuel Hahnemann Monument for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Samuel Hahnemann Monument

The article Samuel Hahnemann Monument you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Samuel Hahnemann Monument for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 17:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Admiral David G. Farragut

The article Admiral David G. Farragut you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Admiral David G. Farragut for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 23:20, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

User:Nu Yawk NY

I am stepping away for a bit but he is over 3RR at this point on Washington, D.C., and has a level 3 vandalism warning if that information is of any use to you - JohnInDC (talk) 22:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

@JohnInDC:, thank you. I've started a discussion at ANI. APK whisper in my ear 23:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for picking up the slack - JohnInDC (talk) 00:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
No problem. APK whisper in my ear 03:42, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

Your GA nomination of Major General John A. Logan

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Major General John A. Logan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 20:20, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Major General John A. Logan

The article Major General John A. Logan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Major General John A. Logan for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 20:40, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

Your GA nomination of Major General John A. Logan

The article Major General John A. Logan you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Major General John A. Logan for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Caponer -- Caponer (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Good to see you back

Although belatedly, good to see you back, also you missed out on $20. Cheers, --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:56, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

I don't get out of bed for less than $100. (and thanks for the welcome back) APK whisper in my ear 21:04, 6 March 2015 (UTC)


The Fish Article

Hi, I would like to bring this to your attention & get your input on it.(Link Below) With this in mind. I would like to look forward to collaberating and creating accurate content and building this article up.

Link below
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Spot_croaker#Response_to_Reliable_Sources
I do not feel that we should argue over the article and not make progress to correct it.

Cheatspace (talk) 21:09, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

My Jake and Amir Edit

I have just finished downloading the entire series of Jake and Amir. Currently I have 692 episodes, there are confirmed to only be 4 more episodes.

Thus the total episode count is 696, not 750.

Send me a message back to my i.p. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.20.152.86 (talk) 07:59, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Replied here. APK whisper in my ear 11:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Congratulations

The Bronze STiki Barnstar of Merit
Congratulations, AgnosticPreachersKid! You're receiving this barnstar of merit because you recently crossed the 5,000 classification threshold using STiki.

We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool.

We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Widr (talk) 10:19, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. :-) APK whisper in my ear 11:38, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Mr Grimes

A few days ago you tagged this as a hoax and I deleted it. Don't worry if you see it back as a redirect - it's only temporary as part of an educational project on unsourced misinformation. It'll be gone again in a day or so. Peridon (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the heads up. APK whisper in my ear 13:09, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015

Thank You!

Just a quick note to thank you for your work on public art and monuments in Washington, D.C. Great work, and keep it up! ---Another Believer (Talk) 00:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks! APK whisper in my ear 00:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015

The Signpost: 01 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 08 April 2015

The Signpost: 15 April 2015

The Signpost: 22 April 2015