User talk:AAHEA20006
Welcome
[edit]
ukexpat (talk) 01:29, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Please visit talk page
[edit]Please visit Talk:List of unrecognized accreditation associations of higher learning to discuss the reasons for your edits. Your edits have damaged formatting and sourcing, removed content, and added new content that may not be encyclopedic. Instead of getting into an edit war, please explain what you are up to. --Orlady (talk) 00:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
January 2009
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to List of unrecognized accreditation associations of higher learning has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. WadeSimMiser (talk) 00:31, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of unrecognized accreditation associations of higher learning. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I don't know if an edit war is really your intent. Since you are a new editor I suspect it is more likely that you may just be confused why your changes just seem to be disappearing, so you simply make them again. However, you need to be warned that you have violated the wp:3rr rule. Regards, TallMagic (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.
You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you.
Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here. Cirt (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)