User talk:92.12.97.111

June 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Loch Ness Monster.

Trolling - FlightTime (open channel) 21:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

What total drivel. I made a perfectly reasonable comment. Just shove it. 92.12.97.111 (talk) 11:00, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

RolandR (talk) 11:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

July 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generalisation, other talk pages such as Talk:Homogeneous relation are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. 🛧Layah50♪🛪 ( 話す? 一緒に飛ぼう！) 04:52, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nissen hut, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Adakiko (talk) 11:07, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

LOL. I lived round the corner for 20 years. What is the matter with you people?????? 92.12.97.111 (talk) 11:10, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Please see wp:No original research - cite a wp:reliable source - wp:citing sources. Adakiko (talk) 11:14, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Pathetic nonsense. Wikipedia is increasingly idiotic. 92.12.97.111 (talk) 06:50, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

---