Jump to content

User talk:62.7.92.50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Paul Trevillion has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 15:14, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Perfect competition. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Tanvir 08:32, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Art Deco has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 09:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Art Deco. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Cst17 (talk) 09:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Geography, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ferrari. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Two-factor theory, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.

The recent edit you made to Two-factor theory constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 12:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Scientific management, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Scientific management was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2010-11-22T12:26:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Two-factor theory. Ruy Pugliesi◥ 12:27, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

12:30, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Frederick Winslow Taylor, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brill Tramway. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hawthorne effect, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hawthorne effect was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2010-11-30T19:35:46+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

[edit]
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talk • contribs) 13:10, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Chingford, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

February 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Emmanuel Eboué, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Arthur Holland (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Third World has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 09:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Woodford, London, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

May 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dean Smith, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page VERITAS worked, and it has been reverted or removed. However, if you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Kai Ojima 10:39, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Friedrich Hayek, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Fæ (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at John Maynard Keynes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Vrenator (talk) 11:34, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Snail has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Free Bear (talk) 13:20, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Snail constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Gavin Perch talk 13:25, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Snail, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Snail was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.97734 on 2011-06-21T13:26:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:26, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Byrne (actor). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Alex discussion ★ 13:30, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Thomas Byrne (actor). Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Thomas Byrne (actor) with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Shadowjams (talk) 08:09, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Byrne (actor), you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Thomas Byrne (actor) was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953607 on 2011-10-19T08:12:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:12, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Thomas Byrne (actor). Skarebo (talk) 08:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 08:49, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Comparison of social networking software appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Haruth (talk) 20:02, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Josiah Wedgwood with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! Epbr123 (talk) 11:34, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Josiah Wedgwood with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! ~~Ebe123~~ → report ← Contribs 11:39, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Josiah Wedgwood, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:44, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Josiah Wedgwood. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:46, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Josiah Wedgwood, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 11:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scotlandshire, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Matilda of Flanders, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 09:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Luke the Evangelist, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 12:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward II of England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

December 2011

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Montserrat with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Caltas (talk) 10:38, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at St. Edmund's College, Ware, you may be blocked from editing. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 14:03, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Montserrat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator talk 14:06, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle of the Somme, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

January 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mount Matutum, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mount Matutum was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.989917 on 2012-01-19T10:26:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:26, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mount Matutum. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 10:38, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Watt, you may be blocked from editing. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:28, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chair, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Chair was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.973431 on 2012-01-27T12:12:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Horsepower. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:17, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Francium, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Francium was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953275 on 2012-03-21T11:15:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:15, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dirt jumping, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dirt jumping was changed by 62.7.92.50 (u) (t) ANN scored at 1 on 2012-05-23T09:14:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:14, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dirt jumping with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Nasnema  Chat  09:18, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talk • contribs) 15:18, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Summer Heights High because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yoda. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Glenn L (talk) 08:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Insulam Simia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Insulam Simia (talk) 09:54, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:62.7.92.50&oldid=1139368905"