User talk:49TL/Archive/2008
Woah
[edit]You are there! It's nice to get a rollback failed message from you. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 21:48, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hehe, well it's been a long time so I just decided to come back and do a little bit of stufffff :) I'm out of practice though, you seem to be getting them all! — Xy7 (talk) 21:50, 08 January 2008
- Ahh I sure do miss you Phil. Thanks for protecting Luna's talk page. I've protected it, so heads up, they might go after you next. :/ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- No worries :) It'll be good to be popular with the vandals again :P — Xy7 (talk) 16:13, 09 January 2008
- Heh, you mean like this? :D. They will remember you, and you'll pwn like the good old days. You can put my run of being the fastest vandal fighter to shame! Haven't seen ya on the good ole IRC though. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't even know where the IRC channel is these days. If I find it I might pop in at some point :) — Xy7 (talk) 16:20, 09 January 2008
- Here :P No worry about it though. :) KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I don't even know where the IRC channel is these days. If I find it I might pop in at some point :) — Xy7 (talk) 16:20, 09 January 2008
- Heh, you mean like this? :D. They will remember you, and you'll pwn like the good old days. You can put my run of being the fastest vandal fighter to shame! Haven't seen ya on the good ole IRC though. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- No worries :) It'll be good to be popular with the vandals again :P — Xy7 (talk) 16:13, 09 January 2008
- Ahh I sure do miss you Phil. Thanks for protecting Luna's talk page. I've protected it, so heads up, they might go after you next. :/ KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 16:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Seems they've vandalised after final warning. And per the revision on Skate, gosh you are fast with messages :) Rudget. 19:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Mind me. He's been blocked. Thanks anyway, Rudget. 19:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Feminism
[edit]well let me explain myself, i 'experimented' the article Feminism as an act of reflecting the feminist movement commonly understood by many as an experiment itself. Failed as it may be, I'll refrain from depicting my ideologies however popular they may be on that particular page unless i spot obvious anomalous information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.76.76.248 (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]Say w/e you want but alot of stuff is nonsense... you can be free to criticize but when your talking about the Quran thats offensive, so please stop being offensive towards a major religion just because you have some preconcieved notions by birth of being hateful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.27.75.229 (talk • contribs)
- You were removing whole sections from the article. Additionally, do you really consider this edit as productive? — Xy7 (talk) 21:02, 09 January 2008
Samuel Aba of Hungary
[edit]There is a great deal of historical data on hand. You are entering unsupported data. Why? What is you angle? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.54.87 (talk • contribs)
- To me it just looked like you were removing content for no reason. To make it clear that you're removing content in good faith, please use edit summaries in future. Thanks :) — Xy7 (talk) 23:08, 09 January 2008
- Where are you trying to get with your story. What is you ojective? Your information is inacurate and going somewhere? Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.54.87 (talk • contribs)
- I have already given you an explanation. — Xy7 (talk) 23:19, 09 January 2008
- What do you nean "Samuel I Aba". Where did you get this information. There was only Samuel Aba, and that is it. NO "!". Why are you trying to create a Fairytale from this historical figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.54.87 (talk) 23:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I did not write this article, I know nothing on the subject. I've explained why you were reverted. Please sign your posts on talk pages too. — Xy7 (talk) 23:25, 09 January 2008
- Every time I do contribute to Wikipedia I get the following message:
- “Šaľa”
- “Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. -- GraemeL (talk) 12:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
- Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ST47 21:53, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Please stop. If you continue spamming, as you did in Triad, you will be blocked from editing. Accurizer 14:44, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- This address -195.91.54.87 – is an address of the internet provider in Slovakia. I am one of many Wireless Users. I have nothing to do with Sala ….
- Each time I am trying to Sign my username: KE . Obviously I am not successful in doings so. I could use a hand in this. a
- I do not contribute to Wikipedia if I have no knowledge about the subject matter. I have no problem if you do grammatical corrections, but please do not remove information just because you assume that I am a VANDAL. Assumption is a mother of all the f…
- Anyway, Best Regards, DrewKE
- I am really experiencing a problem in signing my users name correctly. I could use a help with this.
- Thank You, DrewKE —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.54.87 (talk) 05:59, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I did not write this article, I know nothing on the subject. I've explained why you were reverted. Please sign your posts on talk pages too. — Xy7 (talk) 23:25, 09 January 2008
- What do you nean "Samuel I Aba". Where did you get this information. There was only Samuel Aba, and that is it. NO "!". Why are you trying to create a Fairytale from this historical figure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.54.87 (talk) 23:23, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have already given you an explanation. — Xy7 (talk) 23:19, 09 January 2008
- Where are you trying to get with your story. What is you ojective? Your information is inacurate and going somewhere? Why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.91.54.87 (talk • contribs)
sorry
[edit]My kid was playing with the key board. Jason —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.174.80.178 (talk • contribs)
Hi regarding "the nolans" page
[edit]hi someone is removing good work i did its been there months and there only doing it to be nasty how can i stop this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.110.98.123 (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Can you provide links to the edits that remove good work? Thanks, — Xy7 (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2008
Your warning to 209.68.98.10
[edit]In this edit you placed a final warning to someone whose edit history didn't necessarily warrant it. I have placed a subsequent level 3 warning. HokieRNB (talk) 17:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. The user made two 'vandalistic' edits in a short space of time and they were issued a warning automatically by my monobook. Thanks for clearing it up. — Xy7 (talk) 17:52, 10 January 2008
Pop art
[edit]im very sorrry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.151.201.117 (talk) 18:31, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you're very sorry then perhaps you should stop vandalising articles. — Xy7 (talk) 18:36, 10 January 2008
Threat
[edit]Or what Mr. High and Mighty? You'll block the whole school? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.6.171.10 (talk) 19:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Xy7. You blocked this user recently and I declined their request for an unblock. The user has now come back with a source for the change they were trying to make to the Sarah Harding page and it looks reasonable. I am inclined to unblock them and help them make a properly sourced edit. I'd like to get your thoughts first as the blocking admin. Best, Gwernol 19:34, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar award for you!
[edit]The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I award you this Barnstar, Xy7 for reverting vandalism on my user page. Keep up the good work! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 20:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
Award
[edit]The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar for your amazing vandal fighting. I've seen you everywhere on RC Patrol. STORMTRACKER 94 22:02, 10 January 2008 (UTC) |
Your welcome
[edit]Thanks for saying thanks? I don't get that a lot. Llamadog903 (talk) 22:12, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for blocking this IP Address. Please participate in the further discussion of this IP Address at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#User_talk:63.65.73.22_.28edit.7Cuser_page.7Chistory.7Clinks.7Cwatch.7Clogs.29. Thanks! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:51, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've extended the block slightly (to 72 hours), and increased the semi-protection to cover this block. Thanks, — Xy7 (talk) 23:00, 10 January 2008
- Thanks again! — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 23:19, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Just Me?
[edit]Is it just me, or are there a terribly large number of page blanking's today? I know you are working on it cause I keep getting my rollbacks stomped by you ^_^. Well done. --ShakataGaNai Talk 18:32, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks :) Yeah I've noticed that, perhaps because it's Friday? Ah well :) — Xy7 (talk) 18:34, 11 January 2008
Heh
[edit]Did I beat you to the *rollback* on that Californian city vandalism? ;-) Now I know why admins used to beat me in the past! :-D -- Mentifisto 19:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Whoops sorry about that :P — Xy7 (talk) 19:17, 11 January 2008
- Sorry about what? :-) I'm just enthusiastic about this rollback. I have no idea why the community could make such a fuss about it when it clearly could help in reducing the amount of vandalism (since it's faster, so more vandal reverts would be made). -- Mentifisto 19:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just sorry that I warned the user instead of you by accident :) I'm glad to see you're making good use of the tools! Keep up the good work, — Xy7 (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2008
- Thanks. But no problem about warning users instead of me, in fact I don't mind since instead of doing that I could continue patrolling (and now warnings (still made with TW) have become extra-slow so I'm not particularly eager on them). -- Mentifisto 19:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Just sorry that I warned the user instead of you by accident :) I'm glad to see you're making good use of the tools! Keep up the good work, — Xy7 (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2008
- Sorry about what? :-) I'm just enthusiastic about this rollback. I have no idea why the community could make such a fuss about it when it clearly could help in reducing the amount of vandalism (since it's faster, so more vandal reverts would be made). -- Mentifisto 19:23, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
User:207.190.81.34
[edit]I am increasingly concerned at the damaging vandalism by User:207.190.81.34. I have just seen this which had gone unreverted. I notice that your level 4 warning has not been heeded. I now think that a 3 month block is appropriate. However, since you have given a further warning I don't want to impose one over your head. I should welcome your reaction, please. TerriersFan (talk) 20:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- Ah yes, I see. I blocked them for 8 weeks, I hope you think this is reasonable :) Thanks, — Xy7 (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2008
- Indeed I do; thank you for your reconsideration. TerriersFan (talk) 20:17, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
hello
[edit]can you help me? i'm trying to put up a page about a theatre director in new york and it keeps coming down. i can't get the reference page to load. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheatreKid01 (talk • contribs) 01:14, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- The page was originally deleted due to non-notability (please see WP:NN), and therefore all recreations of the same article will be deleted. Hope this helps, — Xy7 (talk) 01:17, 12 January 2008
Speedy Delete mixup
[edit]My apologies for the confusion on the Nathan mowry page (thankfully deleted, once again). I seemed to inadvertantly recreate the article, presumably due to it being deleted at the same time I was trying to nominate it for SD. My contribution to the page was not intended! Regards, ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 01:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
No Problem
[edit]The block was no problem, after all, it is better to block and rethink than let go unblocked, I was testing the functionality of an irc bot. Maybe putting pages "on wheels" isn't a good idea :P Thedjatclubrock :) (T/C) 17:19, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, it turns out that we'd had an on-wheels attack just minutes before so I jumped to it without paying much attention :P Sorry again, — Xy7 (talk) 17:22, 12 January 2008
Please use friendlier test templates
[edit]I would like to encourage you to use friendlier templates in response to vandalism. For first-time vandals, it's good to use {{subst:test}} . This gives them a friendly, encouraging message that invites them to get involved in Wikipedia. In response to this somewhat less friendly message from you, this user posted an apology at the help desk explaining that they'd hit "edit" by mistake. Remember, first-time vandalism often really is some sort of test. --Coppertwig (talk) 20:51, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Sandpit
[edit]I AM editing in the sandpit, as suggested by you, Wiki front page and other user!!! And now you are getting rude posting in my profile. Tosser.--LITTLETWOT (talk) 21:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
They are twats, though
[edit]You've got to admit Chelsea represent everything bad about football. They buy their way to titles, their staff are overpaid and overrated prima donnas, their fans don't sing, their fans are either toffs or glory-hunters, they consider themselves a brand not a club. THEY ARE JUST PURE CUNTISH MORONS Soopa hoops77 21:48, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Tomiko Van
[edit]Just a request for new information on her, any formal way this can be done? —Preceding unsigned comment added by PseudoKirby (talk • contribs)
Barnstar for you
[edit]The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar | ||
For going above and beyond the call of duty by protecting against vandalism even in the most obscure of articles, like dorkish essays. Zenwhat (talk) 23:09, 12 January 2008 (UTC) |
Edit
[edit]The edit I made was a test, and I already changed it back to the way it was before I made it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.160.3.91 (talk) 00:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- So you did. However please use the sandbox for any future tests. Thanks, — Xy7 (talk) 00:15, 13 January 2008
- Ok sure —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.160.3.91 (talk) 00:21, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Your indefinate block message
[edit]I noticed that you blocked Wathappenedhere (talk · contribs). Normally the standard indef block templates such as {{uw-block3}}
drop a Category:Temporary Wikipedian userpages category to tag the page for future permanent deletion. You might consider adding that to your standard message. --NrDg 02:25, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
hey
[edit]can u fix the HIM wiki site i messed it up! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Six66 (talk • contribs) 05:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Muzza
[edit]please tell me, where do you think muzzas hang out. because there is no reference to their locaiton on the web page. ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.73.102 (talk) 14:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have no idea. I wasn't the person who reverted your edit, however I don't think the text you entered is suitable for an encyclopedia. — Xy7 (talk) 14:50, 13 January 2008
Regarding the "Fred Negro" page
[edit]Dear Xy7, I have it on good authority that during an appearance at the Mutant Wrestling performances Fred Negro did indeed behave in the explicit manner described therein. May I ask why you removed it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.185.175.159 (talk) 14:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hmm I've had another look, and it doesn't really look notable enough to be kept in the article. However if you can find a source for this claim, I won't revert again if you re-enter it into the article. — Xy7 (talk) 14:55, 13 January 2008
Can you please block him? They have got two sets of complete warnings, and they are still vandalising non-stop. Thanks, Crazy Boris with a red beard (talk) 15:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar award for you!
[edit]The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
I award you this Barnstar Xy7, for beating me in reverting vandalism far too many times today. Keep up the good work! The Helpful One (Talk) (Contributions) (Review Me!) 15:51, 13 January 2008 (UTC) |
Hi there, a little less than a year ago, you kept the above article when it went up for AFD, I was wondering if you could cast your eye over the article and reconsider? I still believe it should of been deleted, and in fact, I think it might come under advertising, but I wanted to see what you think before I formally nominate for deletion review. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I can't really change my mind on this one after such a long time has passed since the AfD. The AfD, however, did not reach a consensus which is was why it was closed as such. I have also removed the AfD notice that you tagged the page with, as it links to an out-of-date AfD. If you are still unhappy with the outcome of the old AfD, I would suggest re-nominating the article for deletion rather than nominating it for deletion review, as Wikipedia:Deletion Review states This process should not be used simply because you disagree with a deletion debate's outcome but instead if you think the debate itself was interpreted incorrectly by the closer, and in my opinion the original closure of the AfD was justified. However please feel free to nominate it for deletion review instead if you think it's necessary, I have no objections. — Xy7 (talk) 13:47, 14 January 2008
- Ah ok, thanks. How do you nominate without the old discussion coming up again? I don't want to have to delete it? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Create a page such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masterdisk (2nd nomination) and follow the same procedure :) — Xy7 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2008
- Edit: Also see Template:Afdx. — Xy7 (talk) 19:55, 14 January 2008
- Ah ok, thanks. How do you nominate without the old discussion coming up again? I don't want to have to delete it? -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]There have been a few problems concerning this IP. I would like to make it known that this IP is a school account. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.36.50.3 (talk) 19:31, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
For the great vandal-fighting work, which you do here every day. :-) Best wishes from —αἰτίας •discussion• 20:19, 14 January 2008 (UTC) |
- Thanks :):) You're doing great yourself, I've seen you around a lot recently :) — Xy7 (talk) 20:32, 14 January 2008
trnytrj
[edit]Hey! I've fixed a few problems on your userpage Xy6! —Remember, the Edit will be with you, always. (Sethdoe92) (drop me a line) 20:43, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry
[edit]I'm Sorry —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.170.59.108 (talk) 22:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
What?
[edit]And just who do you think you are? Telling ME what to do? Dramanote (talk) 23:03, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
hey i wasnt doing anything bad this is true if you have ever read anything its always on this its the new saying if you have something go wrong you just say logans a retard... come on its cool and you guys are freaking out about nothing... if this is a guide let the public know the new news —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eagleeye813 (talk • contribs) 23:39, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
i go to that school todd beamer. i was tryin to reconize some people that go there that are kool, why did u take it down? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevo363 (talk • contribs)
- Not suitable for an encylopedia. — Xy7 (talk) 23:49, 14 January 2008
- well thats gay i should be able to reconize people that go to my school. there is useless stuff that on wikipedia, but u wont let me say that some people are kool.
- i should be able to reconize people that go to my school. there is alot of useless stuff on wikipedia. why wont u let me say some people are kool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevo363 (talk • contribs)
Barnstar :)
[edit]The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | ||
Great job today, I kept on recieving 'Xy7 has already reverted' error messages from Lupin's AVT (and that's a good thing!) :) Excellent work! Midorihana~いいですね? 06:13, 15 January 2008 (UTC) |
Edit to Ball Bearing change
[edit]I want to apologize about the editing done to the Ball Bearing on January 14th 2008. I was looking up some information and I had to step away from the computer for a moment. It was my four year old child that made the edits to the article. 66.158.176.211 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.158.176.211 (talk) 15:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Rudget!
[edit]My RfA
[edit]My request for adminship was successful at 64/1/2! Many thanks for your participation and I will endeavor to meet your expectations. Cheers, Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 09:22, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Master Chief (Halo)
[edit]Ok thanks but how did u know i edit sumthing? wierd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddachieb6 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- All your edits appear in recent changes. — Xy7 (talk) 17:51, 16 January 2008
Nooo!
[edit]Ahhhh! Gold I ask you?! Well, if that's what you want! KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 23:51, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
????????
[edit]alright whats the big idea here?! I just made and edit and all of a sudden you get all "this is your last warning" message whats up with that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maddachieb6 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- You were vandalising several articles and so you were warned for it. — Xy7 (talk) 18:17, 17 January 2008
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Old friend
[edit]Hello old friend. What are you up to lately? -- Cat chi? 13:47, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 14:16, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:53, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Bot activity
[edit]I was going over the list of bots and noticed that XyBot (talk · contribs) has not edited in a very long time. Is this bot still active and if not, would you object to it being de-flagged? Please post your comments to Wikipedia_talk:Bots/Requests_for_approval#Dead_bots since this is a rather widely-posted message. MBisanz talk 06:35, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 13th and 17th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 11 | 13 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 12 | 17 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 02:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy Birthday
[edit]--Nadir D Steinmetz 10:40, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Staffwaterboy Talk♂ 12:31, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 24th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 13 | 24 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Hard time, eh?
[edit]I checked your userpage history, and it seems you're having a hard time reverting vandals. Would you like me to help by sending me a peep on my talkpage when your page cops it off vandals? I hope I can help! RoryReloaded (talk) 07:44, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
GeForce 9 vandalism
[edit]Hi.
The user 213.140.6.116 keeps fucking around with the technical specifications table on the GeForce 9 page. He keeps moving it in the bottom of the page and removes a few lines.
He did it for the 6th time already and it's getting annoying. Can you please block the ip ?
Thank you. Iulian28ti (talk) 17:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Blocking Congress
[edit]I am writing a school newspaper article on vandalism of Wikipedia by high school student sand then the high school's IP address getting blocked. I am trying to show that schools are not the only institutions blocked. If I could quote you that would really help my article. my article is due 04/18/08. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt484 (talk • contribs) 14:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
[edit]Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:35, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 17:00, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Vbc-t
[edit]Template:Vbc-t has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 14:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 10:10, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
I need graphics editing help
[edit]I noticed you are listed to help people in designing their user pages.
Well, I need help with a similar type of thing - graphics editing.
I'm preparing to coordinate this:
and for it I'm developing some awards. Each award will include an image, and that's where I need help...
I've got to have all the awards done by July 15th, and I don't even have the first one finished yet.
I'm looking for someone who knows how (or is interested in jumping in and learning how) to work on images in xcf format using GIMP, or Inkscape, etc. (Because I and others will need to be able to edit each image's layers after you are done with it).
If this sounds like something you are interested in helping with, please drop me a note.
By the way, both GIMP and Inkscape are free, making it easy to get started from scratch.
I look forward to your reply.
The Transhumanist 12:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:23, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:09, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 25 | 23 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 26 | 26 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 27 | 30 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 28 | 7 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:56, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 29 | 14 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
From the editor: Transparency | ||
WikiWorld: "Goregrind" | Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block | |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 30 | 21 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:43, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
[edit]--Meldshal [Chat] 18:15, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
Double redirects
[edit]- This protected page has been detected as a double-redirect. User:Xy7/monobook/old/3.js is a redirect to User:FireFox/monobook.js, but that title is now a redirect to User:Xy7/monobook.js. --RussBot (talk) 13:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
- This protected page has been detected as a double-redirect. User:FireFox/monobook/old/3.js is a redirect to User:Xy7/monobook/old/3.js, but that title is now a redirect to User:FireFox/monobook.js. --RussBot (talk) 13:51, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
What? — Xy7 (talk) 14:05, 05 August 2008
- Sorry; I was testing a new script and (obviously) found a few things that could be improved. However, the gist of the messages is correct: your page User:Xy7/monobook/old/3.js is a redirect to User:FireFox/monobook.js which in turn is a redirect to User:Xy7/monobook.js. I thought that you'd want to know that this page is appearing on Special:Doubleredirects, although what you do about it is up to you. --Russ (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 28, August 9, 11 and 18, 2008.
[edit]Sorry I haven't been sending this over the past few weeks. Ralbot (talk) 06:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 31 | 28 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 32 | 9 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 33 | 11 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 34 | 18 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
From the editor: Help wanted | ||
WikiWorld: "Cashew" | Dispatches: Choosing Today's Featured Article | |
Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
:O
[edit]There you are! So you haven't disappeared after all. :O--§hanel 05:14, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 25 and September 8, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 35 | 25 August 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 36 | 8 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:49, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for September 15, 2008.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 37 | 15 September 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks man =) Fin©™ 22:02, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Xy7 (talk) 22:16, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
Deletionist
[edit]Has wikipedia turned into a cult of deletionists? You have speedily deleted the article about American Society of Nephrology (ASN) which a large not-for-profit organization of 11,000 physicians and scientists and publishes multiple internationally renowned medical journals. Probably your next action is going to be the deletion of American Heart Association and American Lung Association articles. Mohit Agarwal (talk) 08:37, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- I apologise. Nevertheless, the article needs improving, and sourcing, otherwise I'll probably look towards AfD'ing in the near future. — Xy7 (talk) 12:53, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
re:message
[edit]sorry, and thank you Chineseeagle123 (talk) 14:12, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Libeled page not protected.
[edit]Re [1]: I can't watchlist every page that's libeled and which I handle at OTRS - there's a permanent backlog with BLP vandalising on these non notable articles. Please semi-protect, watchlist and manually revert all the libel, or salt. -- Jeandré, 2008-09-22t14:34z
- I must be missing something, because to me, a page with only 8 edits this year doesn't require semi-protection. However I've taken your word for it seeing as I've probably missed a lot when I was away. — Xy7 (talk) 14:45, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]res2216firestar has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!
Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Thanks for getting the vandal on my talk page, have a cookie for that.--res2216firestar 16:43, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. Thanks :) — Xy7 (talk) 23:49, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Thank you!
[edit]The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar | ||
I,Mr. Old-Skool, award you, Xy7, this barnstar in doing such a wonderful job in defending Wikipedia! (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC) |
So, you haven't helped me directly, but you have helped many and Wikipedia itself in getting rid of unwanted "contributors," so I just wanted to present this award to you as a thanks for what you do!
THANKS!!! Mr. Old-Skool (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! :) — Xy7 (talk) 23:50, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Deletion review for Bishop Brigante
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Bishop Brigante. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Suntag ☼ 13:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
These bizarre Tania Head deletions
[edit]The twice-blocked 88.2.21.225 has now apparently come back as 68.175.66.17 to delete the Idontlikeit sections from Tania Head. I've left a medium-strength warning since he or she is obviously not a newbie, but history suggests it's going to be another 3RR. Scolaire (talk) 07:52, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, Xy7. There seems to have been some complication with your recent semi-protection of this article. Not only was the padlock set for five days while the protection was in fact indefinite, but the protection was not recorded in the logs, causing an irrelevant fragment from 2007 (the last entry in the protection log) to appear at the top of the editing window, referring to unprotection of the article right below the "this page is semi-protected" message! Any clue as to the source of this mess?
Thank you for your time. Waltham, The Duke of 21:55, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- Um yeah, sorry. I think the source of this problem is Twinkle, at the time I hadn't realised there was a problem but I'm not using it anymore now until it's fixed. I've asked about it and reported a bug but no response yet. — Xy7 (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I had no idea Twinkle had a problem—maybe because I use it about once every two months. :-) All right, thanks for the quick reply. Waltham, The Duke of 09:22, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
Deleted talk page with warning?
[edit]I was thinking of leaving a warning for an IP that keeps adding an external link, but when I got to their talk page I found you had deleted your warning to them? I'm just mystified. Are they 'special'? :-) Shenme (talk) 06:41, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- I must've either left the wrong warning at the time and forgotten to replace it, or had a completely random change of heart. I don't even remember it myself. But no they're nothing special :P So feel free to leave that warning. — Xy7 (talk) 08:48, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
New Zealand
[edit]You removed the semi-protection for this article a bit over a week ago, but an established editor has suggested that given the level of drive-by vandalism, semi-protection makes sense. As the original protecting admin, I agree even though I am a staunch believer in anon right to edit. You might like to add your view to Talk:New Zealand#Protection back?.-gadfium 07:29, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism after a last warning.
[edit]Dear administrator, at 18:05, 20 February 2006 you issued a "last warning" to user: 207.96.176.72 for vandalism. However, at/on 17:34, 2 October 2008 this user vandalized the article: Malapropism by changing "Norm Crosby" to "fuck Crosby" and again at/on 17:39, 2 October 2008 he/she vandalized the same article by changing "Busting children" to "fucking children". I'm going to fix those articles. Please ban this user. Thanks, 70.119.126.195 (talk) 01:08, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- 2006?! That was two and a half years ago, I think that final warning would've expired by now. Please take it to WP:AIV if the user continues to vandalise. — Xy7 (talk) 14:49, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
eminem
[edit]why did you delete that i put on eminems song that he said marky wallberg is a faggot? isn't that worth mentioning?