User talk:PseudoKirby

June 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Capcom, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Microsoft have been rumored to be buying Capcom for years. Please don't add rumors to Wikipedia, unless you're prepared to cite a reliable source. Tlesher 04:03, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "Microsoft Buys Capcom" link you provided on my user page, http://news.yahoo.com/s/Microsoft/20070619/MSCP/133037, appears to be broken. In any event, if you do have a link to a reputable source, go ahead and add the news to Capcom--but do make sure that the referencing link works. Tlesher 04:20, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:BrookeTheGentleman.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:BrookeTheGentleman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of tags from images

Hi, I've been doing some image copyright cleanup, and I noticed on several occasions when someone had tagged an image as lacking some necessary information (source, or fair use rationale), you simply removed the tag without adding a rationale. Please don't ever do that again. For one thing, it won't save the images from being deleted — I've just deleted a few of them. For another, it may lead to your account being blocked. I notice that those images in question were not originally uploaded by you. If you have any questions about our image policy, you can ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. ElinorD (talk) 13:11, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to deviantART. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Imroy 06:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Xbox 360. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. It's fine to disagree about the accuracy of an edit, but you shouldn't personally attack other editors as "stupid". Wikipedia cannot function without civility between editors.--McGeddon (talk) 11:04, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well people are pissing me off with there analitity if that is even a word PseudoKirby (talk) 11:14, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that happens on Wikipedia. It's important to rise above it and just get your point across, though - if you insult another editor, they'll find it harder to take your criticism seriously, even if you're making a good point. --McGeddon (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RX8RS.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:RX8RS.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:19, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, PseudoKirby, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

There is a page about the verifiability policy that explains the policy in greater detail, and another that offers tips on the proper ways of citing sources. If you are stuck and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 05:02, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Final Fantasy X, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Also, I think you should use the proper tags for such discussions. I'm not sure which ones, though. — Bl ue 。 10:59, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jamzy

A tag has been placed on Jamzy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 20:38, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cry On

Hi, you don't know me, I am a contributor and an administrator of a collaborative online encyclopedia. This is not GameFAQs, this is not a forum, this is a place where insulting people and using caps locks will get you penalized. Now, I respect that in all probability you are a young adult and I don't want to hurt your feelings, however unless you read up on (and respect) WP:CIVILITY, WP:NOTABILITY, and WP:CRYSTAL, your contributions will likely be reverted and you may get blocked from editing. If you don't like my tone or advice, you may find encouragement and mentorship through Wikipedia's adopt-a-user program. Please don't leave any more angry non-sequiturs on my talk page, they will be reverted and ignored. So long and good luck, ˉˉ^anetode╦╩ 04:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:MitsubishiEclipse.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MitsubishiEclipse.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Toyota 3S-GTE engine has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Cpl Syx ^[talk] 00:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, jackass, its not unconstructive, I am combining the articles like it has been suggestedo n the pages, they all belong to the same S Engine Family, Stop Undoing my fucking work

3SGTE 3SGE and 5SFE all belong in the same page

PseudoKirby (talk) 00:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Toyota 3S-GE engine. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Toyota 3S-GE engine. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. HappyInGeneral (talk) 01:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Regarding the S family engines. It's been discussed in the past whether the 3S-GE and 3S-GTE articles should be merged into the S article but no conclusive agreement was made. I think people are reacting a bit to your major changes. Please feel free to discuss on the 3S-GE or 3S-GTE talk page if you feel merging is a good idea. But beware - swearing will diminish your credibility. Cheers. Stepho (talk) 04:00, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you look there isnt any other engine that gets its own page, they are apart of the engine family pages, RB26DETT, 2JZ-GTE, LS1, 4G63T, SR20DET, EJ205, 13B, K20A.... on top of it, the information is already in the S family class, you leave those other articles up its just redundancy... PseudoKirby (talk) 06:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now tell it to the others on the 3S-GE talk page. I have a few pros and cons but I want to discuss it on the page in question. Stepho (talk) 07:02, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

uh the last posts on the discussion are about 2 years old.... I dont think anyone cares.. PseudoKirby (talk) 20 January 2010 (UTC)

People are reverting your changes - proof that they care. If you want them to stop reverting then you will have to give some reasons. I've opened a new section on the 3S-GE talk page for this. Stepho (talk) 08:27, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Last of Us. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Trut-h-urts man (T • C) 18:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, PseudoKirby. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]