Jump to content

User talk:47.39.190.24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Moops. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Albers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Moops T 03:24, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moops - this is all my website: senatoralbers.com
Thanks,
John 47.39.190.24 (talk) 17:49, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Brad (talk) 21:53, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict-of-interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 47.39.190.24. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ''Flux55'' (talk) 21:55, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm MuffinHunter0. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, John Albers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Muffin(Spreading Democracy, one edit at a time) 18:04, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have added a single item which is not pertinent and blatantly political. Stop pushing biased information. 47.39.190.24 (talk) 18:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If there is an issue on John Albers, please feel free to bring it up as a discussion on Talk:John Albers. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 21:33, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2024

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to John Albers, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Repeated replacement of a normal, cited encyclopedic article with a poorly formatted dump. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 21:31, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to John Albers, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please stop the disruptive editing and replacing well-developed content with unformatted text. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 00:49, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is an informational page and you are making specific blatant political messages with no context. 47.39.190.24 (talk) 00:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This never occurred. I have not injected any political messages into this or any other article. Here, I simply reverted the poor rewrite of an article by the subject of the article, pure and simple. Subjects of articles are not supposed to edit their own articles. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:28, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at John Albers. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. For the personal attack in my user talk, disruptive editing, and admitted conflict of interest, please cease editing the article in question. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 00:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stefen - you have a blatant political bias. You have social media pages which simply attack conservative people and ideas. No real information about yourself. This is the definition of a grifter. You have taken 2 issues with your bias opinion and edited a page. This is foolish and immature behavior. 47.39.190.24 (talk) 02:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Every human being has a political bias, including you as you express you have a conservative one. I have done absolutely nothing to "attack conservative people and ideas" in the Wikipedia. Outside of the Wikipedia, it is mine and everyone's right to agree or disagree with anything they choose to agree or disagree with. I might suggest that editing your own article after being told you cannot is the type of behavior you decided I was expressing. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 01:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Magruder - Liberals and Progressives in the Ohio River Valley, supporting biased politics is not what Wikipedia is about. 47.39.190.24 (talk) 03:28, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.facebook.com/thestefentower
Bias... 47.39.190.24 (talk) 03:33, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Since I have done nothing politically biased with regards to your article or any other, your charge has no basis. Oddly enough, I recently removed political campaigning from your article that was against your position, as we don't allow campaigning from either side in articles, as it violates WP:NPOV. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 01:23, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is his bias: https://www.facebook.com/thestefentower
Stefen Tower is a fake name, he is Steve Magruder. 47.39.190.24 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Most user names are fake. Let me introduce you to The Internet. LOL. And your charge of "bias", again, has no merit. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:34, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

47.39.190.24 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have someone with blatant political bias trying to make changes to my page This is not what wikipedia is for.

Decline reason:

Unblock requests are about recognizing what you did wrong. It never works to keep blaming the other person. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

47.39.190.24 (talk) 03:08, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note to admins: Every editor comes here with their own biases, but I have never intentionally injected my bias into this or any other article. All that happened here was a COI editor editing an article about themselves, and in a very incompetent manner (i.e. from an editor's POV, I don't care about his politics - I only care about the quality of the article). And because I was involved in stopping them from doing that, this person is lashing out. Until this person recognizes that Wikipedia does not allow people to edit articles about themselves, and begins to follow our policies around that, they should remain blocked. Stefen 𝕋owers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 17:49, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.