User talk:3bdulelah

Welcome!

Hello, 3bdulelah, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Khazar2 (talk) 17:53, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Palestinian Governments Palestinian Governments They are three governments in Palestine. The first is Palestinian National Authority, a democratic regime with a Parliament and president elected by vote and a Government led by a Prime Minister and named by president. The government has a foreign minister. The Palestinian National Authority asked in 2012 ask for observer status at the UN General Assembly. (http://english.alarabiya.net/articles/2012/08/04/230378.html). After Palestine granted non-member observer state status in the United Nations, Palestinian National Authority renamed itself State of Palestine (move not recognized by Israel). This is Palestine which listed as a state recognized by the UN. The second is The Government of HAMAS In The Gaza Streep, a Government in rebellion against the legal government of Palestinian National Authority which in present leads only West Bank (Ramalah). This government was formed without elections. The third is State of Palestine, proclaimed on 15 November 1988 by the Palestinian National Council (PNC) in Algiers, a putative state, de facto ineffective despite partial international recognition. This state has not a Parliament and president elected by people. Palestinian National Council (PNC) is the legislative body of the Palestine Liberation Organization, which is not elected through general elections, that is not a democratic parliament. That body elect the president of this State of Palestina who is the president of Palestine Liberation Organization. The Executive Committee of PNC is the government of this state of Palestine and is led by president of Palestine Liberation Organization . It is not a foreign minister but a responsible with foreign relation. The single link with Palestinian National Authority is the person of president who is the same. It is announced the unification of State of Palestine and Palestinian National Authority but in present they are distinct entities. This situation is reflected on www.rulers.org and www.worldsatesmen.org. Bogdan Uleia (talk) 17:07, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Logo of Ghuraba al-Sham Front.png

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Ghuraba al-Sham Front.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 07:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Ghuraba al-Sham Front for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghuraba al-Sham Front is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghuraba al-Sham Front until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pass a Method talk 11:35, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

July 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.

You have now created two articvles which have no reliable source returns on google. If it happens again I will raise your username on the administrators noticeboard. Pass a Method talk 21:49, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Soureces should be english sources, not Arabic. Pass a Method talk 22:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Authenticity and Development Front

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Authenticity and Development Front requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Pass a Method talk 21:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

though the article did not qualify for speedy deletion, it really needs additional references if at all possible. DGG ( talk ) 07:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

WP:GNG and WP:RS

Please read the above two guidelines when you plan to create an article in the future. Pass a Method talk 22:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ghuraba al-Sham Front

The article Ghuraba al-Sham Front has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I did a google search for "ghuraba al-sham front" and there was not a single return from outside of wikipedia or from a reliable source. It was created by an editor who has also created other non-wp:gng compliant pages.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pass a Method talk 23:31, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:42, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Can you identify a group?

Maybe you have an idea which group made this video and which group does the guy with the gun belong to? Someone not using his real name (talk) 16:33, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

The speaker said it's the Free Syrian Army.94.96.87.165 (talk) 16:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Authenticity and Development Front for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Authenticity and Development Front is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authenticity and Development Front until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VQuakr (talk) 01:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

Hello, I saw your post pointing out the incorrect date that the Islamic State was declared. I have a section on the Talk Page titled "The date of the Islamic State's proclaimation" which you are welcome to join to make your case. Gazkthul (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

ISIS article

Can you help translate the Arabic acronym for ISIS? Is it "DAESH" or "DAISH"? Supersaiyen312 (talk) 22:06, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

It's more of pejorative than acronym. I see DAESH is better. 3bdulelah (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. The Arabic wiki also uses it. Supersaiyen312 (talk) 02:58, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

By the way, I have to ask.. Do you know why the English version is more detailed and longer than the Arabic version? Supersaiyen312 (talk) 03:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Because we have different articles for the former Islamic State of Iraq and Al-Qaeda In Iraq 3bdulelah (talk) 03:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

DAESH

Do you know why the name is pejorative, and why ISIS hate it so much? No-one seems able to answer this question and I have looked on the internet but can find nothing on this. Btw, I have altered the date in the infobox for the establishment of ISIS to 8 April 2013. There was lot of discussion about which was the correct date on the Talk page and I agreed with Gazkthul, that we have to record the date on which group themselves declared the new name and establishment of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. Wikipedia has to record facts, after all, not dispute them and make its own interpretations. --P123ct1 (talk) 21:52, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

First thanks for correcting the date. Regarding the name (IS) want to be called as "The Islamic State" while most Muslims refuse to use this name because if we use it this will reflect that we recognize them as the supreme legitimate government of all Muslims around the world like the early Islamic State or the Rashidun Caliphate. This is why they use eather DAESH or Islamic state Orgnaiztion (Tanzeem Addwlah Al-Islamya). 3bdulelah (talk) 18:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. Looks so obvious now! No wonder they don't like DAESH and find it insulting. DAESH was in use before they became the Islamic State (according to the footnotes in ISIS), but I suppose even with the name Islamic State of Iraq and Levant (ISIL) they were laying claim to having established an "Islamic state" which Muslims did not accept. --P123ct1 (talk) 21:47, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Yes exactly Daesh or داعش came from D= Dawla دولة (state) A= Islamyah إسلامية (Islamic) E=Eraq عراق (Iraq) Sh= Sham شام (Levant). 3bdulelah (talk) 22:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. My date change was reverted, Gazkthul reverted it back to the April 2013 date, and he has been reverted by Toolen, who put the 2014 date in in the first place. It is an old discussion on the Talk page here. I have responded to Toolen's comment in the thread you began. Just an FYI in case you haven't seen these latest comments and reverts. --P123ct1 (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

P123ct1 I read that DAESH sounds like crush or stomp so it has a descriptive negative feel. from the Telegraph "A strain of thinking indicates ‘Daesh’ is a pejorative, deriving from a mixture of rough translations from the individual Arabic words, notably the Arabic verb دعس, within the name, which means to tread underfoot, trample down, crush." Is that correct? Legacypac (talk) 00:05, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

No not true داعش doesn't equal دعس. 3bdulelah (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

3bdulelah: I am trying to keep the discussion going on the date on the Talk page here, so perhaps you would like to join in when you can. --P123ct1 (talk) 14:46, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

THis guy knows nothing! in Falujah (2014) they were not alone while in Azaz (2013) they were alone after kicking out FSA's Northen storm) and in tens of diffrent cities in Syria http://bigstory.ap.org/article/jihadis-capture-northern-syrian-town-near-turkey 3bdulelah (talk) 15:29, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 July 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 18:03, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Cities and towns in the war in Iraq and the Levant, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 20:25, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Al-Qaryatayn

Please see Al-Qaryatayn#Capture_by_Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant, Talk:Palmyra_offensive_(July–August_2015)#Al-Qaryatayn. Maybe new page should be created. 495656778774 (talk) 19:02, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Your recent edits...

Please see Talk:Palmyra_offensive_(July–August_2015)#Al-Qaryatayn, contested info at Al-Qaryatayn#Capture_by_Islamic_State_of_Iraq_and_the_Levant 495656778774 (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Requesting moves:

Please see: WP:REQMOVE, Template:Requested_move 495656778774 (talk) 21:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Homs Governorate offensive (July–August 2015)

A tag has been placed on Homs Governorate offensive (July–August 2015), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 495656778774 (talk) 08:58, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Homs_Governorate_offensive_(July–August_2015) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Homs Governorate offensive (July–August 2015). Since you had some involvement with the Homs_Governorate_offensive_(July–August_2015) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. 495656778774 (talk) 18:20, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Jaysh Al-Sanadeed

An article that you have been involved in editing—Jaysh Al-Sanadeed —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. David O. Johnson (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Third Battle of the Shaer gas field

Excuse me, but just where in this revert/edit here [1] did you provide a source that says the events from a week ago are part of the same offensive that ended a month ago? Even Mehmedsons has stated this is not the case. And also, I do not see a source calling it a major ISIL victory. EkoGraf (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Corrected that, Thank you 3bdulelah (talk) 05:37, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Glad you corrected the date. However, the source you added for the victory is from May 5th, which is only 3 days after the battle/offensive started. The battle/offensive lasted until May 30th and, even though you don't want to admit it, included failed ISIL attacks on the second field, airbase and Huwaysis. I remind again, 3/4 of ISIL's objectives were not accomplished. So, how is a source for a victory in one-quarter of the offensive also a source for a victory in the whole offensive? EkoGraf (talk) 05:40, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

we already discussed this, you are the only one who want's to expand this article to an area not related to the same offensive. you can't call an offensive that led to the capture of the largest gas filed in Syria as "Indecisive"! if you wan't you can expand the date until the recent recapture of Huwasis by ISIL because battles were still ongoing in that area. if you want to talk about T4 offensive and ISIS presence north of the airbase then you can create another article because this battle is ongoing for more than a year now and the main aim was to cut SAA forces in Palmyra, so it was part of Palmyra offensive 3bdulelah (talk) 05:49, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Don't have the strength to fight you on this anymore since you will obviously continue to edit war. Made the compromise you requested per the talk page. EkoGraf (talk) 05:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

That's Okay for me 3bdulelah (talk) 05:51, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

you are the only one who want's to expand this article to an area not related to the same offensive, I'm not seeing Mehmedsons and 175.110.86.117 making objections on the inclusion of T4 and Huwaysis. So basically, its actually you who are the only one who's saying the offensive started and ended at Shaer. But like I said, whatever, have it your way. EkoGraf (talk) 06:00, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Sirte

Doesn't matter what it might or might not be. What matters is what's it commonly called. Per Wikipedia's policy on common names (look it up) we name an article per what reliable media outlets commonly call it. And they are mostly referring to it as a battle, not an offensive. Three editors agreed to this (consensus) and requested a technical redirect (back to its original title) from an administrator which was done. So, please revert your last edit and stick to Wikipedia's policy on: an established consensus, common names and making a proper move request (which you didn't and originally made a unilateral move). EkoGraf (talk) 02:57, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

As u wish. u can revert my edit. What I wanna say is that the Media started calling it a battle after it becomes inside the city only. 3bdulelah (talk) 03:00, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok, thank you. I will have to make a request from an administrator again due to the technical reasons. EkoGraf (talk) 03:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, 3bdulelah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Suwayda

Please read talk page.link Mehmedsons (talk) 17:40, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Sources

Thanks for creating Battle of Sana'a (2017), can you please add your sources? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 12:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Sure 3bdulelah (talk) 12:34, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Have you got sources about timeline. Fightenning began in August 2017. --Panam2014 (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

There was low level fighting in August but what happened yesterday is the real start of the battle, August clashes can be added to the background section. Reuters article I added to the article considers last Wednesday to be the starting date. 3bdulelah (talk) 15:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Okay. But have you got live sources about the advancing of the battle ? --Panam2014 (talk) 16:00, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

http://www.aljazeera.com/topics/country/yemen.html 3bdulelah (talk) 16:04, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, 3bdulelah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Battle of Aden (2018)

Hi Please check the news. I think we should create an article. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

Hello, yes I saw the news but I'm too busy right now, please start the article and I'll be happy to help, so far I can only call it "clashes" not "battle" 3bdulelah (talk) 13:46, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

I think I'll take care of it. If not for the battle of Sanaa too, the sources spoke of "clashes" while Saleh died there. There the separatists took over presidential palace. --Panam2014 (talk) 13:48, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

They captured government buildings in Khourmaksar, The palace is in Ma'asheq away from clashes and if there is a source that talk about this then they are wrong. 3bdulelah (talk) 13:50, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 3bdulelah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, 3bdulelah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2021 (UTC)