Jump to content

User talk:24boxes media

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, 24boxes media, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 24boxes media! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pela Adhi Akshar (November 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 22:24, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 28)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 22:31, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]
Information icon

Hello 24boxes media. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:24boxes media. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=24boxes media|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 22:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT I AM IN NO WAYS BEING PAID FOR THIS. 24boxes media (talk) 19:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No indication of notability. Previously deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kunal Shah (2nd nomination); no added notability since then.

The draft creator is apparently an undeclared paid editor, and has resubmitted twice without adding any reliable independent sources.

bonadea contributions talk 22:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Re: your draft about Kunal Shah (Shakthi)

[edit]

Hi 24boxes media

Please view my feedback on the draft here:

Also, please change your username. Usernames which look like a name of a company are now allowed. Accounts belong only to an individual.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Regards, -- Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 22:59, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Typo by @Gryllida " ... which look like a name of a company are now allowed" should say not allowed. David10244 (talk) 10:50, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]
Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

  • Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. 331dot (talk) 23:07, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

24boxes media (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear 331dot. Please accept my apologies if the article came across as material for advertising or promoting. That was in no ways the intention. I met this actor/person in New York and we got talking. That’s when he told me what he did. I wikid him and could not find anything but i was able to find him through google and a few other articles. That’s when i thought of including his name in Wikipedia. I am researching more on this actor and his work he is currently doing. I have been able to gather some articles that i assure you will me the Wikipedia norms. Please unblock me.thank you 24boxes media (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Decline reason:

One unblock request open at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

24boxes media (talk) 22:05, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

24boxes media (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Request reason:

Sorry, i did not think 24boxes media would come across as a business site user I’d. I propose changing my userid to my name initials Vb0302. Please unblock my userid

Accept reason:

331dot, while the username superficially looks as though it could be the name of a business, my searches have failed to find any evidence that it is. In fact I haven't managed to find any mention of "24boxes media" anywhere except Wikipedia and two other sites which have mirrored Wikipedia:Noticeboard for India-related topics. As for the editing, there is some wording which might be regarded as promotional, such as "his breakthrough performance", but it seems to me to be well within the range covered by good faith new editors who don't yet know about Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, and suitable for a friendly warning, rather than a block. I am therefore very much in favour of unblocking. Do you wish to comment? JBW (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My concern about their username is satisfied(though I second your advice below) but in seeing their first request above, there may be some COI concern here. However, that probably doesn't need to stand in the way of unblocking. 331dot (talk) 21:27, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
24boxes media, I can change your user name if you would like me to. For the reason I have explained above I don't personally think it is necessary if you don't want it changed, but there may be an advantage in having a username which isn't likely to be mistaken for a promotional name. If your username is changed and you then try to log in under your old username, you will get a message telling you that the username or password is wrong, which might make you think that you have lost access to your account. You can in fact simply log in with the new username, and the same password as before, but I like to warn editors before changing the name, to avoid confusion. If you do want the renaming to go ahead, post a message here saying so. In that message include both the text {{ping|JBW}} and ~~~~. I will then be automatically notified of your message. JBW (talk) 20:58, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pela Adhi Akshar

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 24boxes media. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pela Adhi Akshar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:24boxes media/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 24boxes media. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:24boxes media/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:35, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Pela Adhi Akshar

[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Pela Adhi Akshar, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 02:58, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:24boxes media/sandbox

[edit]

Hello, 24boxes media. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:57, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24boxes_media&oldid=1191658497"