User talk:21775198.138-dopisnik

CDG-ANUBiH moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, CDG-ANUBiH, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:56, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! 21775198.138-dopisnik, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CDG-ANUBiH (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ingenuity were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CDG-ANUBiH and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CDG-ANUBiH, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TGIFLY moved to draftspace

Currently the article is a) based on a single paper (with a bit of window-dressing from a second), b) too detailed for using a single source, and c) contains substantial copyright violations - e.g. the conclusions are copied almost verbatim. The latter is the big issue - please remedy. I further suggest condensing to a couple of paragraphs and if possible incorporating a few additional sources. Cheers --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 14:17, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:CDG-ANUBiH has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CDG-ANUBiH. Thanks! HenryTemplo (talk) 19:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:CDG-ANUBiH has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CDG-ANUBiH. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TGIFLY

Hello, 21775198.138-dopisnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TGIFLY, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:CDG-ANUBiH

Hello, 21775198.138-dopisnik. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:CDG-ANUBiH, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, I'm Anaxial. An edit that you recently made to Chinchillidae seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Anaxial (talk) 05:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is customary to write taxa names from subspecies to family in italics.21775198.138-dopisnik (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The house style observed here (which incidentally is that used in the discipline at large, as far as I am aware), is that genus names are the highest level to be italicized. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 10:24, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]