User talk:217.33.165.88

November 2018

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. Your recent edit to the page Radja Nainggolan appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:52, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Barrow A.F.C., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:53, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Matthew Platt article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 16:01, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm William Avery. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Lancaster City F.C.—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. William Avery (talk) 14:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonny Edgar

Hello, 217.33.165.88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonny Edgar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, BBC Radio Cumbria, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 07:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello world! To reply to a talk page message, click 'Edit' at the 'Hi' heading, add your short message at the end, followed by four tildes for signature. Then click 'Publish changes'. Please give it a try, then I will leave you feedback on your draft about Max Davies! Thank you! Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 05:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Max Davies (racing driver) (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Also see WP:NMOTORSPORT.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Max Davies (racing driver) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Max Davies (racing driver), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 217.33.165.88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 10:41, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Super 1 National Kart Championships, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Nottingham Forest F.C., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dewritech (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Concern regarding Draft:Max Davies (racing driver)

Hello, 217.33.165.88. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Max Davies (racing driver), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:36, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Pete Wild article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 16:55, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Billy Ocean—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Grapevine (disk magazine), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 15:30, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2023

Hello, I'm AviationFreak. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Derek Porter (footballer), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. AviationFreak💬 16:27, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

--Yamla (talk) 12:05, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

why am I even blocked lol 217.33.165.88 (talk) 14:13, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

217.33.165.88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can someone explain why I am being blocked for block evasion when I have done no such thing, don't make baseless accusations and otherwise fix this /please/, otherwise I will wait till the block expires and carry on like normal

Accept reason:

You were blocked because you were reintroducing content from a block-evading user and therefore appeared to be that user. Blocks apply to the person, not just the account, hence the block on this IP address. However, on deeper investigation, I think you are unlikely to be that person. I accept your word that you have not engaged in block evasion and so I have lifted the block. You have my sincere apologies. If you wish to reintroduce the edit you made (but not as a revert, please), you are free to do so. Note that you must personally verify the image is correctly licensed and not, say, owned by Dreambox themselves. Yamla (talk) 14:51, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Ganges river dolphin, you may be blocked from editing. --Yamla (talk) 12:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was my understanding that the Ganges river ishorribly polluted by human waste however, so the native biota have had to adapt to this accordingly. 217.33.165.88 (talk) 14:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find a reliable source (WP:RS) to cite (WP:CITE) that this has caused evolutionary changes in the Ganges river dolphin. You can't rely on your own understanding; see WP:NOR. --Yamla (talk) 14:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Dipangkorn Rasmijoti. --Yamla (talk) 16:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 08:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

217.33.165.88 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To reply to 331dot, are you just incapable of reading what I said in my latest comment on User talk: GeneralHamster? I stated I have lost access to my account which was blocked, that is why I am making an IP edit, because some genius has disabled my access to UTRS so I have no means of communicating to you otherwise! It makes no difference to me if you block this IP range because I do not use it, I am just informing you as a courtesy and asking for direction - so I do not understand what is so hard to get about that. I am asking what the usual policy is as I don't have the email associated with the account. I am not evading my block. I am asking a question. If you are incapable of understanding that then I really don't know what a sensible expectation is. Again, it feels like WP:BITE is preached but never practised.

Decline reason:

Your only pathway is via ArbCom. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not new at this so BITE is not relevant, and it doesn't mean we should let newcomers do whatever they want anyway. You've been told what you should do to work on getting unblocked. You have lost access to UTRS due to abuse. If you lost access to your account, tell that to ArbCom. 331dot (talk) 09:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What abuse? I havent used UTRS since the summer. And again I have lost access to the account so I cant prove who I am. Do I just mail ArbCom and explain I have lost access to the account? 217.33.165.88 (talk) 09:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It says on your user talk page "UTRS ban for abuse." Yes, your only pathway forward is ArbCom. 331dot (talk) 09:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain what the UTRS ban was for though? "Abuse" doesn't mean anything to me, I haven't touched UTRS since my last appeal back around Aug. Quite frankly we will have to agree to disagree, as I do not feel my blocking was fair to begin with. I know the truth of this, I can sleep with that knowing at least I was wronged.217.33.165.88 (talk) 10:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You posted a vulgar personal attack that was absolutely abusive. 331dot (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't abusive in my last UTRS appeal. And I have not made one since around August so it won't have been me. 217.33.165.88 (talk) 16:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then you can tell that to ArbCom. 331dot (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.