User talk:212.77.220.109

The IP address that you are currently using has been blocked because it is believed to be an open or anonymizing proxy, such as a VPN service. To prevent abuse, these proxies may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you are using an open proxy or VPN service, you will need to disable it or turn it off in order to edit Wikipedia.

If you believe you are not using an anonymizing proxy, the most likely cause is that another customer using your IP address who was previously assigned this IP address was running an open proxy. You may appeal this block by adding the following text on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is _______. Place any further information here. ~~~~}}. You must fill in the blank with your IP address for this block to be investigated. Your IP address can be determined here. Alternatively, if you wish to keep your IP address private you can use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

More rarely, your network equipment or that of your service provider may be misconfigured or compromised by malicious software (such as a virus). For more information, see the WikiProject on Open Proxies.

Administrators: The IP block exemption user right should only be applied to allow users to edit using an open or anonymizing proxies in exceptional circumstances, and they should usually be directed to the functionaries team via email. If you intend to give the IPBE user right, a CheckUser needs to take a look at the account. This can be requested most easily at SPI Quick Checkuser Requests. Unblocking an IP or IP range with this template is highly discouraged without at least contacting the blocking administrator.

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Logistics (film) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Logistics (film) was changed by 212.77.220.109 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953028 on 2016-12-05T22:26:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:26, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to Buddhism by country, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 03:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2017

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 01:26, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to India–Nepal relations has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: India–Nepal relations was changed by 212.77.220.109 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.891447 on 2017-07-05T16:10:38+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Sellur K. Raju, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Ifnord (talk) 15:25, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Richard Higgott, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You removed a section that contained vital information about the articles controversies and yet it had been properly referenced and cited. You should open a discussion in the articles talk page before removing any information that's been properly referenced. Thelost byte (talk) 14:29, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Richard Higgott, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Hi I appreciate your edits, but if you feel this specific information must be deleted kindly post your comments in the talk page. If you revert my edits again without discussion/ a significant consensus from other people. I will have to seek moderator intervention on your account and you may be banned from any other future edits. Thelost byte (talk) 14:45, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at President of Ghana. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. XYZt (talk) 05:22, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

212.77.220.109 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Genuine collateral. This is a shared Qatari IP

Decline reason:

I'm not seeing a block on this IP or its range. If you are still unable to edit, please tell the message that appears when you attempt to edit. Note that some articles may be protected from editing by IP users only. If that's not the case, or there is somehow a block here, you should request an account at WP:ACC to avoid this problem. 331dot (talk) 08:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ephraim Bagenda, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ephraim Bagenda. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 13:38, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia as you did at File:Martin Roll - Senior Advisor.jpg, and also, as you did at Martin Roll. Zazpot (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Yuri Kondratyuk without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Peaceray (talk) 17:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]