User talk:1ST7/Archive 1

Archive 1

Editor of the Week

		Editor of the Week
		Your ongoing efforts to improve the encyclopedia have not gone unnoticed: You have been selected as Editor of the Week, for excellent content work even as a newer Wikipedian. Thank you for the great contributions! (courtesy of the Wikipedia Editor Retention Project)

User:Khazar2 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

I nominate 1ST7 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for Editor of the Week. Though a comparatively new Wikipedian, 1ST7 has already created ten articles, taken two through Did You Know, and brought four more to Good Article status, including the megabestseller The Kite Runner. She/he also has begun GA reviewing, becoming one of the first class of graduates from the Good Articles Recruitment Centre. 1ST7's current collaboration is to participate in bringing an important and hugely trafficked article to Good Article status. She/he is helpful, courteous, level-headed, and everything we could want a first-year Wikipedian to be. -- Khazar2 (talk) 12:41, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! Go Phightins! 16:58, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Naval Criminal Investigative Service

1ST7

Editor of the Week for the week beginning September 29, 2013

Always moves consensus debates forward while respecting fellow editors. Adept at Diplomacy

Recognized for

Promoting "working as a team"

Notable work(s)

The Kite Runner, Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Submit a nomination

• Congratulations and thanks for your early splendid WP career. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! --1ST7 (talk) 20:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

For you

This user has declined one or more awards, given for minor efforts, in recognition of those who have earned them for their great efforts.

Noticed you are not one to take credit when you feel it is not due you. Not many people will, or can, do that it seems. Though this only involves an item on a greater award, the same sense of integrity was nonetheless exhibited. Salute! -- Gwillhickers 18:04, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your kind words. I really appreciate it. --1ST7 (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for review

Very happy that it finally happened. Thank you very much!!! Abhi (talk) 06:36, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome! --1ST7 (talk) 18:04, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Human rights

Hi 1ST7,

Thank you very much for the barnstar! It is quite encouraging, especially because you chose the human rights barnstar. I hope to encounter you on Wikipedia again in the future.

Neelix (talk) 12:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome! It was well-deserved. I hope to see you again sometime, too. --1ST7 (talk) 00:31, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Freemasonry and Women

First of all, thank you for taking the time to review this article. As I discovered during the re-write, it's a specialist field with no specialists. I hope I've covered the points in your review. Shout if I haven't. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 01:03, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome. You did a nice job with the re-write, and, as you'll see on the talk page, I've passed the article as a GA. Congratulations! --1ST7 (talk) 01:54, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for that, and woo hoo. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 10:33, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Berlin (NCIS)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Berlin (NCIS) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 05:32, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Wanted to let you know that I've finally finished with this review. My apologies for taking so long, and thanks for the opportunity to use in the GA Recruitment program. Please be patient with how picky I've been. I'll give you a week to address my feedback. Good luck! Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 17:09, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

GA1 review of Shemini Atzeret

I think this is now ready for you to take a fresh look. Thanks. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:38, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Once again, thanks for your help. Quick question: Any brief ideas on anything missing to promote it to A-class and/or FA? StevenJ81 (talk) 02:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome. The thing I would recommend most would be to make the article more comprehensive. One thing you can do is add a section on religious views associated with the holiday and its influence, along with some opinions from prominent religious figures and scholars. It's also a good idea to get a peer review for the article before you submit it for FA nomination. --1ST7 (talk) 02:42, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Gotcha. Not my top priority now, but thank you for helping me understand the steps going forward. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for And the Mountains Echoed

Gatoclass (talk) 00:08, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Whistleblower

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Whistleblower you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:21, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Whistleblower

The article The Whistleblower you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Whistleblower for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring The Whistleblower to Good Article status. Your quality submissions are always a pleasure to read. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:49, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Whistleblower

The article The Whistleblower you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Whistleblower for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Bosnia and Herzegovina Barnstar of National Merit
		For your work on The Whistleblower. Keep it up! 23 editor (talk) 00:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Shemini Atzeret

Shemini Atzeret, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:43, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Berlin (NCIS)

The article Berlin (NCIS) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Berlin (NCIS) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Figureskatingfan -- Figureskatingfan (talk) 19:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

Congratulation

Congratulation for making the first Good Article in the NCIS universe! Thank you for all of your contributions, and I'm really impressed with what you have accomplished. Keep up the good work! Jonny2BeGood (talk) 06:36, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! That's very kind. --1ST7 (talk) 06:38, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Shemini Atzeret/GA2 Talkback

Hello, 1ST7. You have new messages at StevenJ81's talk page.
Message added 13:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Chandralekha

Thank u for giving me all those improvement suggestions. I'll edit the best I can. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:22, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

This is one hard paragraph to rewrite differently:

There was a minor role, the hero's bodyguard, which, a talented stage-actor, who had been on stage from boyhood and graduated to female roles – he had even grown his hair long for this purpose – coveted. He called on Veppathur Kittoo several times asking for a break, even an also-ran role. Eventually Kittoo took this slim, struggling stage actor to the 'Boss' who had seen him perform on stage. To the astonishment of Kittoo – and the poor actor – Vasan told the aspirant bluntly that he was totally unsuited for films and warned him not to be lured by the honey-coated words of film people and give up the stage. Vasan later told Kittoo that the actor had a squint eye and chided his assistant for wasting his precious time! The actor whom Vasan turned down was Villupuram Chinniah Pillai Ganesha­murthy, later known as Sivaji Ganesan! The rift between the two that began then never quite ended.

---- Kailash29792 (talk) 07:58, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

The article has been updated with all the changes u suggested. Pls have a look. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 11:07, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Now I feel the article is ready to pass, but Pls keep in mind that money is not the same forever. Using the INR convert for ₹3 million would convert it to dollars from today's rate. But in 1940's, the exchange rate was different. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Response is on Talk:Chandralekha (1948 film)/GA1. --1ST7 (talk) 03:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank u for passing the article. If ever I was awarded a barnstar, I'd like it to be for having brought the once slumped article to a GA in less than a year. ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 03:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Shemini Atzeret redux

I did end up agreeing to go back to this, and it's been pretty wild, as you can see here: Talk:Shemini Atzeret/GA2. StevenJ81 (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Wow, that does look pretty wild. I'm glad you're going back to this, and I'm still happy to help with it. Just let me know if there's anything specific that you'd like me to do. --1ST7 (talk) 23:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. If you think you can clean up the notes and bibliography of the current version so that they become internally consistent, that would be a big help. (I prefer the notes to be numeric, not alphabetic.) With respect to substance, I'm waiting to see how much farther this discussion goes before I do much more. As you can see, there are a couple of seriously different schools of thought on this ... StevenJ81 (talk) 19:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done --1ST7 (talk) 01:58, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

-- Just to let you know, this was delisted. I'm on indefinite Wikibreak, so I couldn't address it in a timely manner. I'll get back to it at some point, but not right away. Thanks anyway for your help. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:27, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Sorry to hear that... Hope you enjoy your Wikibreak. --1ST7 (talk) 01:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't know if you celebrate Halloween but... Happy Halloween!

	Hello 1ST7, Miss Bono has given you an lovely bat, to wish you a Happy Halloween! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a lovely bat! Enjoy!
	Spread the goodness of a lovely bat by adding {{subst:User:Miss Bono/Halloween}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Abby has to be happy today, lol! Miss Bono ^{[hello, hello!]} 20:22, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Hope you have a great day! --1ST7 (talk) 01:46, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Deportation Armenian notables GA

Thank you for the review.

It is totally understandable that it is more of an FL than a GA. Nevertheless, I'm glad that a GA review was done on the article which makes me more comfortable to send it over to FL. Feel free to give your two cents when I nominate it for FL. Thanks once again. Proudbolsahye (talk) 03:19, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

You're very welcome. I'm sorry that it couldn't be passed as a GA, but I wish you all the best with the FL nomination. Hope you have a great day, --1ST7 (talk) 05:56, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Also, you may want to remove some of the red links before you nominate the article, as Wikipedia:Featured list criteria states that they should be kept at a minimum. --1ST7 (talk) 06:20, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello 1ST7, looks like there's a couple of tasks pending to be resolve at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Deportation of Armenian notables on 24 April 1915/archive1. I just wanted to ask if you're willing to work together with me on it? I would really appreciate it. If not, no worries. Thanks for all your work! Proudbolsahye (talk) 05:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I'm happy to help. --1ST7 (talk) 05:51, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

I've covered first five points. Will help more tomorrow, if needed. --1ST7 (talk) 06:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Adventure Time article you took the task as reviewing for GA

The nominator has been indeffed as a sockpuppet. I suggest quickfailing unless somebody else is willing to take up the task of responding to comments. Beerest355 Talk 23:12, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Adventure Time season 5

Just a heads up. I have been working on the Adventure Time (season 5) article, and I was planning on nominating it for GAN, but Blurred Lines "beat me to" it. Since he's gone, I'd be willing to fix any issues if you'd like to still review it!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:06, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Nefarious: Merchant of Souls

Hi 1ST7,

Thank you very much for contributing to the Nefarious: Merchant of Souls FAC. The article has been featured and I have nominated it to go up on the main page here.

Neelix (talk) 22:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, and congratulations on it passing! --1ST7 (talk) 03:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stolen Innocence

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stolen Innocence you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Stolen Innocence

The article Stolen Innocence you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Stolen Innocence for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Midnightblueowl -- Midnightblueowl (talk) 19:32, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Like -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		Armenian Barnstar of National Merit
		1ST7: I wanted to give you this Barnstar for awhile now. Your work in Armenian related articles are much appreciated by myself and by the Wikiproject Armenia members at large. You are an amazing editor and a tireless contributor to the project. You have also express a very encouraging and helpful attitude towards the project. Your work does not go unnoticed and I truly appreciate what you do around here. Thank you. Proudbolsahye (talk) 06:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013 GA Thanks

This user has contributed to Edward M. Burke good articles on Wikipedia.

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I thank you for your editorial contributions to Edward M. Burke, which recently was promoted to WP:GA.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 17:58, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! --1ST7 (talk) 21:49, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Prostitution of children

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Prostitution of children you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SlimVirgin -- SlimVirgin (talk) 19:20, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Prostitution of children

The article Prostitution of children you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Prostitution of children for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SlimVirgin -- SlimVirgin (talk) 00:22, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Prostitution of children

Hello! Your submission of Prostitution of children at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Cambalachero (talk) 22:32, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

GAN review of 12 Years a Slave

I answered that last issue. thanks--Aichik (talk) 22:23, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elsa (Disney), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Broadway and Jennifer Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of And the Mountains Echoed

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article And the Mountains Echoed you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 15:42, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of And the Mountains Echoed

The article And the Mountains Echoed you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:And the Mountains Echoed for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of And the Mountains Echoed

The article And the Mountains Echoed you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:And the Mountains Echoed for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 13:32, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Archive 1