Hello, Jonny2BeGood, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Just as small point, please don't leave spaces between punctuation and references. You see to be doing this fairly often at the NCIS episode articles that you've been creating. It's also not really a good idea to create articles ahead of time, as you did with The Tell. This assumes that the episode will meet the notability requirements for the episode before it has even aired, which is WP:CRYSTAL. More nformation on the punctuation matter may be found at WP:REFPUNCT. --AussieLegend (talk) 06:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the heads up! No more spaces. Sorry for that. I was inspired by HIMYM-episodes, that's why I created two episodes ahead of time. I understand why, so it won't happen again. It's very helpful to get guidance. Thanks again! Jonny2BeGood (talk) 10:49, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I noticed that you've added links to newer NCIS episodes in the "Notable episodes" list in the show's template. I also noticed an IP reverting your edits, and while I don't agree with making disputable edits w/o providing a summary, I have to say I agree with what the IP was removing. It seems you're simply adding whatever the latest episode is, which I don't think is the point. An episode like Life Before His Eyes I get - it's the 200th episode. Is there any reason these other season 9 episodes are being highlighted in the template? Mbinebritalk ←20:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Damn it... the one time I don't check the article/template/category's talk page! Honestly, I don't get the notability requirement for TV episodes mentioned in templates. With NCIS, for example, every episode has reviews from reliable sources, meaning each is technically a "notable" episode, which makes the template parameter for notable episodes seem more like it's for "extra notable" episodes—which is subjective. My assumption in this case is that the template should be kept to those obviously extra notable episodes while the routine ones can just be linked to from the articles on the specific seasons. Mbinebritalk ←16:59, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hehe, its always the one time you forget its worth checking! I believe the list, like on The Big Bang Theory, includes all episodes with own articles, since often only a few has been created. It's an easy way to "promote" these articles, but when a lot episodes get their own article the list lose its value. Therefore, it may be time to change which NCIS episodes to include. Maybe continue on the talk page? Jonny2BeGood (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I just copied and pasted this conversation onto the template's talk page, although I'm a bit dubious on how much traffic template talk pages get. Maybe someone will bite... Mbinebritalk ←16:21, 1 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You said that the NCIS cast is "listed based on when they first appeared in the opening credits". If you mean the infobox, then you are right, but the order in the cast table is different now and it was different before my edit, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ringmaster93 (talk • contribs) 18:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You are absolutely right. My only defense is that many has edited Palmer recently, which has been reverted. Since you didn't explain your edit, I assumed this was another one. Note to myself: Gibbs' rule number eight: "Never assume anything". Jonny2BeGood (talk) 19:05, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I edited the table again and commented on it. Now the cast is listed in the table in the order of the opening credits and the infobox shows the order of first appearence as a main cast member.
I also changed the color of the "also starring" time for Brian Dietzen, because it now is the mixture of the colors used for main and recurring cast (rgb color model)--Ringmaster93 (talk) 13:06, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to bother you, but an editor apparently took offense to an edit I made today to the article on NCIS's tenth season. I don't see anything wrong with what I did, but I would like a second opinion from a user I can trust. Thank you, Davejohnsan (talk) 02:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I reverted the edit again, and it was meant to support your edit because I don't see anything wrong. The info was from a wiki, and you explained your edit. The comment about "Seen as a harassment" I don't get. The user has not added the info you reverted, unless it's the same as IP user 66.206.115.182. Just keep up the good work! Jonny2BeGood (talk) 11:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That was my assumption, as well, but I didn't want to make any accusations since we're not dealing with sockpuppeteering. In any event, I was just baffled by the accusation and thought it might have been something I wrote in an edit summary, but the warning template he left was more insulting than helpful. Never hurts to ask. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 16:28, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The response doesn't make any sense, but sometimes situations like this one just happens. I think it's important to have a second opinion when the response is as strong as this one, which continued beyond the NCIS-article. Jonny2BeGood (talk) 00:26, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jonny2BeGood. You have new messages at Template talk:NCIS television. Message added 19:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
For taking the time to create all those NCIS episode articles (over three dozen!) and for all the other NCIS related contributions. --1ST7 (talk) 23:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, that's right, but since the episodes has yet to air it's wrong to list them. Nobody can watch the episodes before Netflix releases them on February 14 (as far as we know), and therefore it is still just produced one season and 13 episodes. This is the usual way to present it, just take a look at other TV series listed on Wikipedia (Glee, How I Met Your Mother, Elementary, Game of Thrones, The Walking Dead etc.). It's no difference just because Netflix releases all episodes in a season at once, we still have to wait to include them. Jonny2BeGood (talk) 09:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I concur. The episodes have not been released so they should not be added to the number. I just reverted Dylanbud yet again.--JOJHutton15:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Jonny2BeGood. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hello, Jonny2BeGood. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
.jpg)
_15.jpg){kind=link}
