User talk:1979HondaMoped

This is 1979HondaMoped's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fibrolamellar Registry (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Fibrolamellar Registry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 1979HondaMoped! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hello 1979HondaMoped. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:1979HondaMoped. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=1979HondaMoped|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am the mother of a patient. My son died of Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma. I am a volunteer trying to get a page out, period. 1979HondaMoped (talk) 19:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What may also bother you is that I am a Professor of Chemistry? I can assure you Professors are not somehow immune to their children dying of cancer. I am a volunteer trying to get a page out about the cancer that killed my son. I have my career yes, as a Professor, but it has nothing to do with the Fibroregistry. And I certainly do not make any money from, or have any monetary relationship with, the Fibroregistry. 1979HondaMoped (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:NOBLECAUSE. Theroadislong (talk) 20:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You asked me to disclose if I had a monetary interest. I disclosed that I do not. You wrote, "If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message.

How do I go about requesting a different monitor than you? I believe you are somehow biased about this topic. Your "NOBLECAUSE" response is an indication of it. 1979HondaMoped (talk) 20:43, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We are all volunteers here, I don't usually review twice in a row, if you re-submit another reviewer will take a look and give their opinions. I have no interest or bias with the topic. Theroadislong (talk) 20:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Fibrolamellar Registry has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Fibrolamellar Registry. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 20:51, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Fibrolamellar Registry (July 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Fibrolamellar Registry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 11:48, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Safari Scribe -

I have resubmitted the Patient Fibroregistry draft page. I have tried to make it more neutral and "formal". If you are available, could you give it a quick read? Thank you.

1979HondaMoped Fibroregistry volunteer, Chemistry Professor, Patient parent (talk) 19:55, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fibrolamellar Registry (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fibrolamellar Registry and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:19, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]