Jump to content

User talk:193.156.161.253

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism (see edit log), anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address might be disabled. You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Alternatively, you may email us using your school-issued email address, telling us your preferred username. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at unblock-en-l from an email address listed on your school's website. An account will be created for you. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken.

August 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anders Behring Breivik, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jimbo Wales (talk) 09:37, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Anders Behring Breivik. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 11:43, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Didgeridoo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

September 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Doner kebab, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to News of the World, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of mountains of the United States, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to World Englishes, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Australian English. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at British tea culture, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: British tea culture was changed by 193.156.161.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.959007 on 2011-09-26T11:38:05+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:38, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Navajo people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Stephen (talk) 08:05, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Shadowjams. Your recent edit to the page Svalbard with this edit appears to have added incorrect information, so I removed it for now. Wikipedia articles are written by people like you and me, and we care a lot about the quality of the encyclopedia. Please help us make it better by verifying your contributions with citations to reliable sources. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks, Shadowjams (talk) 10:15, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jens Stoltenberg. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shuipzv3 (talk) 13:08, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Anti-lock braking system, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Biker Biker (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2011

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Markus Zusak, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

February 2012

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dublin, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dublin was changed by 193.156.161.253 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951943 on 2012-02-06T12:12:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:12, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Paul Keating, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

August 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Marjoleinkl. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Douglas Booth without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Marjoleinkl (talk) 09:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Wasell. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Francisco Lachowski, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Wasell(T) 10:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Marjoleinkl. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Francisco Lachowski, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Marjoleinkl (talk) 11:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Francisco Lachowski. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. ~Autumnal Monk~ talk 12:24, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Biker Biker (talk) 16:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to No Easy Day, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm DoorsAjar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Cyprus, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DoorsAjar (talk) 06:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cyprus with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. DoorsAjar (talk) 06:52, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

[edit]

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Sri Lankan Civil War, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 10:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sri Lankan Civil War, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Nath1991 (talk) 13:01, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:193.156.161.253&oldid=1141317043"