Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Javad Nazari Shekarchi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, ناتاشام!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:30, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings and respect Unfortunately, in Wikipedia, no one helps to publish articles, and they only remove the articles of newcomers for various reasons. The article I wrote had more than a hundred valid sources, while I have seen articles that did not have a quarter of these sources, but Because one of the administrators wrote it, it was published in Wikipedia, the problem is not with the sources mentioned or my way of writing, unfortunately, the problem is due to the discrimination of some people, and if I add other sources, in any case, this topic will be deleted again. It can be easily proven, in any case, thank you dear friendناتاشام (talk) 01:45, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings, dear friend, I know I hurt you a lot, so first of all, I sincerely apologize to you and thank you for the guidance you provide. Now that the extra links have been removed from the page, can I request a review? Thanks ناتاشام (talk) 11:43, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello and greetings to you again Yes, I noticed, while thanking your Excellency for your guidance, I would like to say that I tried to use the Open Library and the National Library of France and several other news sources on this page and provide sources that I think are enough for a small article, if in my opinion Do you agree? Move the page to the main namespace. In any case, you are the final decision maker. Thank youناتاشام (talk) 09:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hami Mahmoudi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Greetings and respect to you, dear friend, but I think you were very strict and the sources cited in this article were sufficient and valid. On the other hand, regarding the subject of the article, Mahmoudi's supporter has appeared several times on the Khabar TV channel in Iran, which is the most watched channel. There is a TV station that covers important news in Iran. Interviews and news have been broadcast, and the films are also available. I think you should not have rejected this article, thank you.ناتاشام (talk) 12:42, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hami Mahmoudi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
