User talk:محفوظ ہمارے زبان

This is محفوظ ہمارے زبان's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rushan people has been accepted

Rushan people, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:57, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 20:03, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi محفوظ ہمارے زبان while English sources are preferred and should be used when available, if there non-English sources you are welcome to expand the article using them. Of course, they still do need to meet the reliable sources guidelines. S0091 (talk) 20:20, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 20:29, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 Can you also check Draft:Domaa people? محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 20:43, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I find it best for various editors to review the work of other editors so I will leave it to another reviewer although I do not see any immediate issues. I have to ask, have you edited Wikipedia before as you seem experienced? You do not have to answer the question but just curious. Also, if you are translating articles that exist on another Wikipedia language you need to give attribution. If that is the case, see HELP:Translation. S0091 (talk) 20:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091 Yes, I have. I started editing a year ago, but I do not remember the account name. I'm pretty sure it was something with Pak somewhere in the name. I have also translated in Urdu Wikipedia with the same account. I only edited for 2 months and then quit. I used to be semi-professional, but right now I do not remember that much. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 21:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It appears you remember enough to write a cohesive article. Hopefully it not be long for the other draft to be reviewed. I know the submission template says as long as 4 months but there are only about 30 articles in that category out of the thousands submitted so likely it will be reviewed within a month. S0091 (talk) 22:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 22:41, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, محفوظ ہمارے زبان!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, S0091 (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Domaa people has been accepted

Domaa people, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Asparagusus (interaction) 21:53, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gawar people

Hello, محفوظ ہمارے زبان,

Thank you for creating Gawar people.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

All the sources talk about the language, Gawar-Barti, or the region, none mention the ethnic group.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:59, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the history part, most of them mention the Gawar, a group in Bashgal and Arandu. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 15:04, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rajkoti people moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rajkoti people, is not suitable as written to remain published. none of the sources mention this ethnic group. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Talagang District (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Talagang District instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Talagang District and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, محفوظ ہمارے زبان! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Muhafiz-e-Pakistan per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cyber.Eyes.2005. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 11:57, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit I am not a sockpuppet, I am just interested in the languages of Pakistan. I do not understand why you think I'm a sockpuppet. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 14:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is a sock account because of what I see in the technical logs. As the block notice explains, if you think I have made an error, you can request unblock and another checkuser will review the logs and, if they disagree with my findings, they will unblock you. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:52, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit how? محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 15:45, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

محفوظ ہمارے زبان (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why I am blocked as a sockpuppet. I am just intrested in Pakistan, though I do not live in Pakistan, but the US. And the second thing is why are all my contributions, which did have sources, get deleted. I am not a sockpuppet of User:Muhafiz-e-Pakistan. Yes I am intrested in languages, especially Dardic languages and Dardic peoples, but I am not a sock of him. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool confirms that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 15:58, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit And also why did you delete all my contributions? محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 15:46, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not delete your contributions. Another checkuser will review your unblock request. Please stop pinging me. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:17, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight Which accounts? I do not know any accounts. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My use of the checkuser tool confirmed the Muhafiz-e-Pakistan (talk · contribs) account. PhilKnight (talk) 01:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight I do not know who he is. Please, can you please unblock me. What did I do wrong? I just edited some pages and created some. I didn't harm Wikipedia and add the wrong stuff. محفوظ ہمارے زبان (talk) 02:58, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gawar people moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gawar people, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:30, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]