You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining WikiProject Phoenicia. Please accept this invitation from a member of the project. I can't wait for us to work together! ~~~~
Thank you Elias. I can understand English easily, but editing in English is hard for me. I focus on improving the Phoenicia-Canaan articles in Hebrew (and I am the only editor who focuses on this topic there). I will be glad to help in specipic problems and needs, I have a wide variety of sources (some of the Hebrew sources are quite unique and have information that's very hard to find in other languages, due to the special Hebrew interest in Canaanite topics). Let me know if you need anything and tag me whenevr you want. If there is a special tag-group for Phoenicia expert. פעמי-עליון (talk) 21:53, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
THanks for letting me know (although for a minute I thought the deletion discussion concerns the article itself, and I was relieved to discover it's only the redirect), I will answer you there. פעמי-עליון (talk) 23:27, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey @פעמי-עליון no worries, this looks like an area where you're an expert so if you head over the RfD and just explain it a little I'll withdraw the RfD. It's not personal, I just couldn't find anything and wasn't sure if the redirect made sense. Dr vulpes(💬 • 📝)23:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the compliment :) and thanks for doing it in good spirits and in such kindness, it could be quite stressful for me otherwise. פעמי-עליון (talk) 12:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, I have some reservations about your change of the short description of the Resheph page. As it stands, the cultures were listed roughly in the order of relevance of evidence - Ebla first due to abundance and antiquity, Ugarit second due to being the main source of evidence for the second millennium BCE, and then Egypt where Resheph had limited relevance, with other text corpora not included due to scarcity of attestations. Most authors firmly treat him as a core member of the North Syrian milieu and he's not really attested in particularly many sources from between Gaza and Byblos or so, and I'm pretty sure that's the generally accepted extent of Canaan. Stronger grounds for adding "Hurrian" or "Cypriot" than Canaanite, tbh. HaniwaEnthusiast (talk) 17:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry in advance for the broken English, it is not my first language.
a Figurine of Reshep from southern Canaan
Hi, thanks for approaching. Reshep was a Canaanite god, I don't think you will be able to find a source that says he isn't (it's not an evidence by itself, but it helps the other evidence). His appearence in Cyprus are purely Phoenician, and I don't know about his Hurrian appearences (sadly, I am not very familiar with Hurrian culture and religion). Reshep in Egypt was worshiped as a Levantine god (see for example here), not an Egyptian god. I think there are more evidence, perhaps Elias Ziade will be able to help :) פעמי-עליון (talk) 18:22, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@HaniwaEnthusiast Resheph is mentioned on some of the Sidonian Bodashtart inscriptions (’RṢ RŠPM). The iconography of the "Smiting god" that is often linked to Resheph is also present on the 13th century BC Sidonian cylinder seal of Addumu. Impression and Seal of Addumu, Sidon.
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Thanks for your contributions to Sakkun. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Hi voorts, thanks for keeping Wikipedia sources standard. I myself act similarly in Hebrew Wikipedia.
About the notability of the god Sakkun: We may not know much about him, but he is well attested in the Phoenician onomasticon. I added more sources and put some of the exiting sources (like CIS) in notes. If you check Baumgartner's book you will see that scholars have been dealing with this god and the issues concerning his name and nature for over 150 years. I hope you will be able to accept the submission soon. פעמי-עליון (talk) 12:42, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sakkun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Please be careful removing sourced content as you did here [1], especially when your edit summary only says "Repeated information", suggesting you only removed duplicated content which was not the case.
Hi IOHANNVSVERVS! I will reply here on both your messages.
About the (un)repeated content removal: I apologize for removing the Peel Comission by mistake, which wasn't mentioned twice or more like other events in that section (like the Arab revolt or White Paper). Thanks for noticing, please feel free to give me notes when Imake such mistakes. English is not my first language so my ability to deal with a lot of information at once is a bit wicker than in Hebrew, I will be more careful of such mistakes from now on.
About the Ttemplate: thanks, I was not aware of all of the rules, and I generaly like this kind of infornative templates. I just want to make sure I understood correctly – I am allowed to do more than one revert in pages under ARBPIA within 24 hours, as long as they are not the same page, right? I try to concentrate my edits in controversial topic in a short time every few days to keep the Wikistress down, so I think I might find myself make more than 1 revert in one "window" (not on the same page, of course). פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk11:44, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"I am allowed to do more than one revert in pages under ARBPIA within 24 hours, as long as they are not the same page, right?"
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Hi! I think you confused between Yod (𐤉) and He (𐤄, appears in the picture). Yod is probably based on 𓂝, which is puite identical to Proto-Sinaitic Yod. About 𓁸 – this is interesting, the Proto-Sinaitic He is similar to 𓀠 and 𓁏, but not so much to 𐤄 (there is some resemblance, but the transition is unusual in my opinion), so it is not impossible that 𓁸 is the source to the later form of He. What I think we must remember is thatmost of the findings about Proto-Sianitic script are from hundreds of year after it's initial developmant, so it's very hard to conclude anything decisively. Do you have any sources about the development of Proto-Sianitic script from Egyptian hieroglyphs? פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk13:42, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry yes of course I meant 𐤄. I was just reading Orly Goldwasser's 2006 paper, which is great. Before that I was reading the unicode document on proto-Sinaitic. 𓀠 and 𓁏 are clear to be seen early, but then disappear entirely. I don't think a stem with three lines like that looks anything like a human pose. Temerarius (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Remember, the Judean and Israelite forms were developted almost a millennium after some Canaanites started using alphabetic letters based on hieroglyphs froms they saw, a lot can change in such period... פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk15:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Variations on that 𓄤 symbol were very popular, I think, in non Egyptian-literate areas. I'm not sure what they considered it, but they often put it right next to and equal with an ankh. I'm skeptical of the tub "good" meaning interpretation and of the tet derivation from it. Temerarius (talk) 15:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The letter Teth in the Canaanite script is extremely insteresting, because both in the Phoenician early script and in the Ugaritic script (which was partially based on the Phoenician one) the sign is a combination of the Taw and Ayin signs (and that reflects the pronounciation).
Do youknow any publication of all of the Proto-Canaanite inscriptions? I want to get deeper into this topic, and to do so I need first to be familiar with the archaeological evidence. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk19:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I love your enthusiasm! Feel free to write to me here in another language if it'd be easier for you to do. I don't know what "proto-Canaanite" means, to be honest. What location or time period are you looking for? Or more of the alphabetic development milestones? Temerarius (talk) 19:37, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, "proto-Canaanite" is the name used in Hebrew for any Canaanite alphabetic script before Ahiram sarcophagus, of any location (although I am interested in all of the phases of the Canaanite epigraphy) – so any source collecting pre-Ahiram Canaanite inscritions will be useful for me to learn this script.
It is one of my favorites too :) but no, I didn't take it. The credit goes to Giovanni Dall'Orto. I hope to go somewhen to Sardinia to see Phoenician (as well as other cultures) remains there.
I think I will get a new camera soon and go to the Israel museum to take better photoes of the exhibits, including Lachish Ewer! פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk12:21, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you link to the pjoto of Izbet Sarteh ostracon, so i'll know not to miss it?
About Kuntillet Ajrud pithoi, I think reproductions are still under copyrights, so even if I see them (I am quite sure they are sadly not on display...), I won't be able to upload them.
And of course I am excited to see so many items! Proto-Aeolic capitals, letters from Hasor, one of the Taanakh cult stands (the other one is sadly in Turkey), Tel Dan inscription, the Ketef Hinnom priestly benediction scrolls, and even some Phoenician items :) Have you ever been to Israel Museum? פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk17:22, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've never been to any museum, unfortunately! Not one with this kind of stuff. https://imgur.com/a/2zKb3T8 This is a drawing of the ostracon; the item itself appears pretty blank. The script is light, you can barely see it. I'll try to find that photo again. I think it was taken by Dr Gary Lee Todd. I can't wait to see some crisp pics of the cult stand! Temerarius (talk) 19:47, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I highly recommend you to visit museums, if you can! Photos of the finding are nothing like seeing the real thing.
About Izbet Sarteh ostrakon, I don't rememver it is on display, but I'll check again. And about the original pithoi of Kuntillet Ajrud - sadly they are kept in Egypt... פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk11:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By the way, about the pithoi: due to an agreement between Israel Antiquities Authority and Egyptian archaeologies in 1993, the discoveries from Kuntillet Ajrud were given to Egypt (after it returned to occupy Sinai). They weren't on display and their location wasn't known. In 2011 Egyptian revolution, many museums and storages were looted, but eventualy it was stated that the items that were given to Egypt by Israel were returned to the state and storaged safely in Cairo. Sources are here. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk14:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, thanks for pitching in at Talk:Allegations of genocide in the 2023 Israeli attack on Gaza. More attention on the subject can help the community come to a reasonable decision. But I noticed the input you provided is based on your personal analysis of the subject. This type of input can be counterproductive, because consensus on Wikipedia should be based on reliable sources and policy-based arguments. In the case of a page move, arguments should be based on what the subject is explicitly called in reliable sources, not what individual editors understand or determine it to be. Personal interpretation or analysis is generally given little to no weight when determining the results of the discussion. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Thebiguglyalien, sorry I didn't answer (I started to answer but forgot finishing). I am not sure what do you mean by personal interpretation. The opinion of the ICJ judges, which can in no way be interpreted as accepting the genocide allegations as probable (as I explained there), is in my opinion a way better source than any of the thousands of jounalistic (and non academic) sources that are used for writing the articles about the war. I support the policy of sources-based arguments, so I will be happy to understand where did I deviate from it. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk11:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @פעמי-עליון I am guessing you can read hebrew, and I saw that your edits involve the ancient near eastern religious traditions. It seems that someone translated an article from the Hebrew Wikipedia and it ended up like this: Tavern (ceremony).
I am not an expert but I believe things must have been lost in translation because the term is not attested in current literature. I personally think the article should be moved to draft space until it is okay. What do you think. GusChago (talk) 08:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi GusChago :) Yes, only from the title chosen, I can see it must be immediately moved to draft. I am acctualy the one who wrote most of the Hebrew article, and it is indeed translated from it. I am not sure what is the move-to-draft-policy here (in Hebrew, a new article with problems can be moved right away), please let me know when is it moved to draft so I will be able to correct it! פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk10:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, I can't believe it: the Phoecnician name of Kition is kty (pronounced "kitiya"), so that's how I write it in Hebrew when it comes in Phoenician context, so "in Kition" in "bkty" ("b" = in). The translator didn't understand it (and probably doesn't understand Hebrew at all), so how did he translate the term "bkty" (be-ḵitiya)? "Bakhti"! פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk10:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, I didn't find what I was looking for in this section. I have created a series of posts about the European women's water polo championships and I would like to find information about your own championship. The men's league I know exists here he:הליגה הלאומית בכדורמים in Hebrew but the women's is not. I also know that the team Hapoel Emek Hayarden participated in the first LEN Women's Challenger Cup in the period 2023–24 and logically they were also champions of Israel in the previous season. Thank you very much for your interest. Ewiki (talk) 12:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No there is no english version. I have used it before but the automatic translation did not help me. From what I saw, the federation mentions the most recent and not the history of the championship. If you find anything I would like you to inform me. :-) Ewiki (talk) 13:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I noticed you made multiple changes to images of El (deity) through Commons based on a single source discussing a single bronze statuette of Baal from Tel Hazor. The source you listed to justify your changes does not concern the Megiddo figurine which is considered by scholarly consensus to depict El, not Baal. Likewise, in your listed source, a footnote on page 255 (#6) explicitly identifies the Megiddo figurine as El, not Baal. As such, I have reverted all your edits which removed the El figurine from its parent categories and placed them into Baal. Sinclairian (talk) 16:57, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the notification, Sinclairian. I am sorry but you have some mistakes. The footnote you were talking about cites Canaanite Gods in Metal 1451 – this is indeed a statue from Megiddo, but not this one (the one we are talking about is 1453. If Ornan had think 1453 is El, she would definitely have mentioned it in this footnote...). I'll e-mail it to you if you want. Second, I brought two sources, IPIAO (which is the main one, I will be happy to send it to you as well) and the article by Ornan. IPIAO cites more sources to support this view.
If you have better sources to establish consensus about this statue being El and not Baal, please bring them – I will really be happy to read more about this statue, and I want to know if I was wrong. But if you don't have sources to support this view, please revert yourself. פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk22:12, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I didn't receive a notification for your reply since I wasn't actually tagged. I also noticed that Ornan actually discusses the gilded statue on page 259, where she compares it to an Ugaritic El statuette. For other sources, see ISAC’s Megiddo Expedition (Gordon Loud, Megiddo II, Seasons of 1935–1939, OIP #62, 1948), and this 2020 article from Antiquity. Sinclairian (talk) 17:47, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's weird, why wasn't the tag received? I linked to your user page and signed. Does this give you a notification?
In pp. 258–259 Ornan speaks about phisical-technical-design features, they don't imply an identification with any divinity. For Ornan's careful identification of this statue with Baal see pp. 271–272: "The identification of Baʿal as the deity represented on the Hazor statue finds support in other pictorial renderings, in which a variety of tree or vegetal motifs [...] are associated with a male deity, sometimes identified as Baʿal. [...] A rectangular plaque-like attribute incised with a floral motif held by the flat, gilded statuette from Megiddo (fig. 9) is another example of a male deity associated with a vegetal emblem, in this case an enthroned god as well". And see also in pp. 273–264 a discussion about the problem with the automatic identification of every seated god with El (especialy the citation of Keel and Uehlinger about the statue from Megiddo: "it is too facile a solution to identify all enthroned gods as El and all striding gods as Baal. The battles and defeat of Baal culminate eventually in the enthronement as well").
In this very great and interesting article you linked to I found: "Negbi (1976: 46–59) classifies the seated figure as belonging to the “enthroned male deity” group, and it can be identified as the Canaanite god El, the head of the Canaanite pantheon. [...] The older El is typically represented in a seated position, clearly differentiated from the younger warrior gods Baal and Reshef, who are shown standing with weapons in their raised right hands (Cornelius 1994)." and "The sceptres from Lachish, Hazor and Megiddo can be considered characteristic attributes of the Canaanite god El." The precise statement "... strongly suggest that it belonged to a life-sized statue of the Canaanite god El" refers only to the discoveries from Lachish and Hazor. So this article indeed implies it is probably El, but does not say that in certainty.
Anyway, you're right in that Loud is quite outdated, as such I don't think it matters too much to provide the page number since the point is moot – that said, the statuette is shown in Plates 237–38, and was discovered in area BB, Locus 2048, stratum VII or VI... but I can't seem to find it in the version you linked through Internet Archive. Strange. Sinclairian (talk) 15:15, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's find, I trust what you say, I don't need to see the publication in Megiddo II in my own eyes. Do you have any other sources that say it is El in this statue? פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk16:51, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Aaaaah, I'm sorry. Honestly I've been trying to find out what sources the museum uses for its exhibit but the catalogue number doesn't provide sources, and I can't find a picture of the explanatory plaque in the museum itself. Sinclairian (talk) 14:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My guess is that they based the explanation on Megiddo II, who did a very good job in describing the site as a whole but weren't necessarily experts in the field of recognizing gods in iconography...
Please let my know as soon as you find other sources on this topic; but either way, I think the fact that it is so hard to find multiple sources claiming it is El in this statue suggests it is not a consensus, so the image should not appear in the infobox of El (deity). פעמי-עליון (pʿmy-ʿlywn) - talk21:35, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Tips
.JPG)
