Jump to content

User talk:פארוק

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, פארוק, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Ynhockey (Talk) 20:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC) תודה רבה  ![reply]


You might want to read wp:Sockpuppet Beastiepaws (talk) 21:36, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your contributed article, Mastic ice cream

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Mastic ice cream. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Dondurma. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Dondurma - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Beastiepaws (talk) 00:54, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kindness. "DONDURMA" is NOT "BOOZA" .פארוק (talk) 07:57, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Hebrew

[edit]

Hi Farouk! You are welcome to use Hebrew, but please keep in mind that it's good form to use English on the English Wikipedia if possible, even on user talk which is in public view. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 21:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i want to return the article that i wrote that was deleted in an unjustice. פארוק (talk) 07:36, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Booza

[edit]

What is the difference between dondurma and booza? Beastiepaws (talk) 22:36, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Booza have a softer texture than Dondurma. Dondurma is much harder texture. that what is trying to tell you becouse the arabic ice cream is a stolen recipe that improved to a new recipe for the hot sun of arabian deserts. becouse this ice cream is not melting so fast in the sun. the syrian ice cream is the arabic version of this ice cream. פארוק (talk) 07:31, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, פארוק, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as MIU (Movement for Israeli Urbanism), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kudpung (talk) 11:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks פארוק (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Name pronounciation?

[edit]

How do you pronounce your name? I'm very curious. Bluefist talk 00:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

פארוק = FAROOK =>> an Egyptian Name of Israeli comedic movie from 1986 called "LOVESICK ALEX" =>> [1]

this is FAROOK with Avocado on his head =>> [2]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International Federation of Surveyors, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.fig.net/wb2009/contacts.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 23:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Federation of Surveyors, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. I am a violinisttalk to me here! 23:11, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've replied

[edit]
Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at I am a violinist's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from International Federation of Surveyors, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion, which will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 23:46, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Hafia International Convention Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Philip.t.day talk 22:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at Flinders Petrie's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Level of English

[edit]

פארוק, בהתחשב ברמת האנגלית שלך, לא עדיף שתכתוב בויקי העברי? --Sreifa (talk) 10:36, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

לא פארוק (talk) 13:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

שלום פארוק,
למרות שזכותך המלאה לכתוב ערכים בכל שפה שתרצה, אני גם מבקש ממך בכל לשון של בקשה: תנסה לכתוב ערכים איכותיים יותר, ללא שגיאות כתיב ודקדוק, בעלי מידע רב יותר, ובעלי מקורות רלוונטיים. נכון שעדיין יש הרבה ערכים חסרים, אבל כתיבת קצרמרים שדורשים שכתוב אינה עוזרת לפיתוח של הערכים על ישראל בויקיפדיה האנגלית.
בברכה, Ynhockey (Talk) 20:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

טוב, אני לא אכתוב יותר קצרמרים. - ל"ג בעומר שמח . פארוק (talk) 16:44, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

לצערי לא הכל מושלם, ויש מספר רב של ויקיפדים שונאי ישראל. עם זאת, ויקיפדיה אינה אנטי-ישראלית במהותה. היא מציגה את מה שהמקורות אומרים, ובדרך כלל זה לא טוב לעמדתה של ישראל כי הרבה מקורות באנגלית הם בריטיים, ואני לא צריך לדבר על יחסה של התקשורת הבריטית לישראל. אם בידך מקורות אמינים שמציגים את עמדתה של ישראל, כולנו נשמח אם תציג אותם ותתמיע את המידע שיש בהם בויקיפדיה. —Ynhockey (Talk) 11:17, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Scopus, and behaviour on Wikipedia

[edit]

Hi, thanks for contributing on my talkpage. As you're a relatively new editor I'd like to welcome you to the project. Your edit on Mount Scopus was reverted with reasons, and according to wikipedia practices when that happens you need to build consensus and negotiate with other editors on how to proceed. Just reverting your edit back is incorrect, it is especially incorrect to do so without providing reasons in the edit summary.

Another matter entirely is that you called me "anti-semitic" in your comment on my userpage. This is unacceptable, as calling people racists or anti-semites is impolite and doesn't improve your standing in the Wikipedia community, please read WP:CIVIL.

Concerning the content issue, Mount Scopus is in Jerusalem, and Jerusalem isn't regarded as being in Israel by any state except Israel itself. Therefore including the category "Cemeteries in Israel" to that page is misleading. See for instance this source: "No major foreign government has recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital". Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 21:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are confusing Jerusalem as a whole with East Jerusalem, which is not recognised as being part of Israel. The area commonly referred to as West Jerusalem is recognised as being part of Israel, but all nations keep their embassies in Tel Aviv, the main city of Israel. The city is cut in two you see, and you should not confuse lack of embassies as meaning that West Jerusalem isn't recognised as part of Israel. Mount Scopus is within the Green Line afaik, but over the border (complicated story), and so I don't know its legal staus in the international world. The US recognises it as the capital btw, as you can see in the CIA World Factbook [3]. They also support the statement I just made about embassies.
I do agree though that it is wholly unacceptabloe for Faruk to call you anti-Semetic off the bat like that, it is a personal attack. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 21:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You can not read that another person he hates Jews and hates Israel - a disgrace to say ! To say that Mount Scopus + Mount of Olives is not a Jewish area - that people are talking like that is itself anti-Semitic ok . Write what you want. Jerusalem will remain forever a Jewish city. פארוק (talk) 22:04, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They are Jewish areas of course, lol, but it doesn't mean he is an anti-Semite if he doesn't know their status. He probably just doesn't have a good knowledge of the area (no offense, Daily, but you conveyed that idea by not knowing that the city is commonly regarded as being divided in two). When talking about a place though you must write about it in the context of how the UN and such view it.
It will of course, God willing, but we must remember to follow Wikipedia policies in our edits otherwise we just seem loud and angry. You especially cannot go calling people such things and assuming bad faith like that. Otherwise you make people like Livni look like the voice of reason, and no one wants that. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 20:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: i need your help please

[edit]

Hi Farouk! Your translation was correct. The reason why it's being deleted from the Hebrew Wikipedia is because they don't think it's notable. The process is similar to proposed deletion on English Wikipedia. Unfortunately, since I am not active on the Hebrew Wikipedia, I do not have enough edits there to remove the nomination. In any case, you should try to contact the user who placed the proposed deletion and ask if they can elaborate on the problem they have with it. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 21:51, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to explain to them about the article, yet they thought it should be deleted. I myself did not understand the value itself. Why it says "square" if there are streets, avenues, or plazas. can you explain me plaese ? . פארוק (talk) 22:08, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Can you give an example of this? I only see squares (כיכרות). A plaza is also a square by the way. —Ynhockey (Talk) 22:22, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
for example "National Mall". why is this called there a national square ? . פארוק (talk) 22:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The National Mall is a large square. See Definition 2. —Ynhockey (Talk) 09:43, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
ok, why it is call the "Mall ? . it is not the point. for example, Red Square is the central square of all Russia. פארוק (talk) 18:15, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Um, why not? —Ynhockey (Talk) 19:51, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
??????????? פארוק (talk) 22:36, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

שמע ישראל

[edit]

אני מקבל כאן הודעות אנטישמיות לכן אומר בתפילה אל בורא עולם  :

אנא אדוניי הושיעה נא - אנא אדוניי הצילה נא

כן יאבדו כל אוייבך השם  !!!!

פארוק (talk) 18:27, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article The National Campus for the Archaeology of Israel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable building which hasn't been built yet, failing WP:CRYSTAL

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrmatiko (talk) 11:35, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at Mrmatiko's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Violating of the 1RR

[edit]

The article Old City (Jerusalem) is under a one revert restriction per 24-hour rule (1RR) as are all articles that fall under the scope of the Arab-Israeli conflict (see WP:ARBPIA). You have violated this rule. I would have suggested you self-revert, but your edit has already been reverted. Please do not violate the rule again your you could be reported for edit warring and likely be blocked.

Also, please do not add unsourced information to articles. See WP:UNSOURCED. -asad (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article National Memorial Hall (Mount Herzl) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost incomprehensible (appears virtual gibberish), unreferenced. Possibly incredibly poorly translated, but not (as it stands) a good advert for Wikipedia!

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:22, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Specialized city has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost incomprehensible in places, unreferenced. Possibly incredibly poorly translated, very probably also not suitable for an encyclopedia - is the concept of a "specialized city" encyclopaedic? It's been tagged for reffing and copy-editing since April.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the policy throughly. While I understand your desire to show your passion for the subject (as you have on the Jerusalem talk page), but you are doing it the wrong place. Please save that kind of stuff for web blogs and forums. -asad (talk) 22:07, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on World Bible Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the importance of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Rorshacma (talk) 18:04, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Re: World Bible Center

[edit]

First of all, seeing as I am not Christian then no, your accusation is completely baseless. Making volatile accusations like that in somebodies talk page is in incredibly poor taste, and can result in warnings and further actions if you persist, so please stop now.

Secondly, the reason that the article was tagged for deletion is because it failed to meet the notability requirements to have an article on it. The building is not yet built, and there was nothing in the article that showed why it was important enough to have an encylopedia article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability for help on what makes an article notable. The message at the top of your talk page also has a variety of useful links.

Third, I want to point out that while I initially tagged the page for deletion, it was an actual admin who then reviewed the page and decided to delete it. Deletion of an article is generally a multi-step process in which more than one editor is involved. Rorshacma (talk) 17:05, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see no reason to delete this value, just as there as a projects that were never built are written articles about them.

If you've read it all then you will see that this building should start to be built next month sponsored by the Israeli government. פארוק (talk) 17:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it doesn't matter whether the building will or will not be built, the article was deleted simply because it did not do enough to satisfy the notability requirement to be included as an article. And again, I want to emphasize the fact that I am only the one that initially tagged the article for deletion. I am not the one who did the actual deleting. I am not an admin, and thus I don't have the ability to restore the article even if I wanted to. While I can explain what my reasoning was for tagging it for speedy deletion, your arguments for why it should not have been deleted would be better directed at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion if wish to have the deletion reviewed.Rorshacma (talk) 19:22, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the article as it made claims of importance, such as being launched by a government minister. But the writing needs to be cleared up. Since it was a building it was not eligible for A7 nomination - please note Rorshacma. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at the history of Mastic ice cream, the original article is there. Perhaps you need to convert it to a disambiguation page to refer to three different kinds. Any way you are free to undo the redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:43, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't want to create value for this two kinds of ice cream. So it need to create new value for "Syrian Mastic ice creame" that is different. פארוק (talk) 20:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article World Bible Center has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, no 3rd party references provided

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Skier Dude (talk) 06:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi what does "and in which month the quiz international Bible adults" mean? If you could write some alternative text, perhps I could change it into more meaningful English. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, next question: What is the connection between Israel Society for Biblical Research and the World Jewish Bible Society? Are they the same organisation? I see from the letter from D Ben-Gurion that they used a common letterhead. Did the two organisations merge together? Did one organisation start the other?

And another question: You use the term bible, but are you referring to the Torah or do you include Psalms and prophets books or the New Testament in the project? If it is a narrower term then there may be a better term for the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:40, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rova Mevo Ha'ir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"At present the plan has the working (but not final ) name of Mevo Ha'Ir - "Gateway to the city"," (from external link. This is just the provisional name of a building / construction plan.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:31, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips to help you out!

[edit]

Hi פארוק, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:פארוק/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you.

One last thing to keep as a motto: "It's better to write one good, well-referenced, nicely-presented article than it is to create fifty unreferenced one-line stubs!" Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How references work

[edit]

Simple references

[edit]

These require two parts;

a)
Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>
b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";
== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:פארוק/reftest and try it out.

Named references

[edit]
Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates

[edit]

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier!

[edit]

Hi there פארוק! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you might appreciate some help with references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talkstalk!) 08:32, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks :) פארוק (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive talk page comment

[edit]

I have removed your comment here. Don't disrupt talk pages. Read WP:TALK and comply with it. Sean.hoyland - talk 10:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ok. JERUSALEM IS A JEWISH CAPITAL FOREVER. פארוק (talk) 16:18, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, you can write that here. It's your page. No one is going to remove it. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:26, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited 23 seafarers boat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Sebil (drinking water facility) , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for disturbing you. I withrawed my merging proposal.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
First I proposed a merger of Sebil (drinking water facility) and Sebilj because I thought that they have the same topic. Then one user pointed to the fact that Sebilj is an article about Sebil in Sarajevo while Sebil (drinking water facility) refers to all Sebils in the world. After I realized that I gave up my proposal for merger of those two articles. Conclusion, you can forget about my message. Again, sorry for disturbing you. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 17:33, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Israel Defense Forces History Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to IDF and British Mandate
Clandestine Immigration and Naval Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to British Mandate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:פארוק, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 22:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which page ? פארוק (talk) 22:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I made a mistake when I was looking over the list of new pages and I thought your user page was an actual article that someone made. My apologies! --GouramiWatcher (Gulp) 00:52, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
ok פארוק (talk) 04:45, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Yefet Street, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page British Mandate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Beit David neighborhood has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources present as to establish notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shenzhen & Hong Kong Bi‐City Biennale of Urbanism\Architecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 23:25, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pinhas Kopel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. HARSH TALK 18:15, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Types of cities by geographical region for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Types of cities by geographical region is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of cities by geographical region until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basalisk inspect damageberate 22:09, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Israel

[edit]

שָׁלוֹם פארוק

Today I have logged on my account on English language Wikipedia after some time that I have not done so, and after I did that I noticed a very strange message on my talk page from you. After reading it I must say that I am really puzzled. First of all, I am not shore what you meant with it, and second of all I do not remember of ever meeting you, talking to you about anything, or that I have edited any article that I would deserve receive a message like that.

The message went: i know the Croatians help the Nazys in the WW2. the African migrants in Israel are Iilegal migrants and workers. don't change the subject.

I am a Croat, that is correct, but I am not a Nazi, a Fascist or a Ustaša, and not even one of my ancestors was a Nazi, a Fascist or a Ustaša. That that some Croats helped in WW2 those groups to do evil does not mean that all Croats did any evil things or supported those evil things. I happen to like the Hebrew people, the Hebrew language and the State of Israel, and I would really like to go one day to Israel as a tourist and visit Tel Aviv and Yerushalaim, and all major religious Hebrew and Christian sites.

Now, what the second part of you message is concerned, I am not quite shore what is should mean. Does it mean that the African migrants in Israel are legal or illegal? I do not remember of ever writing anywhere of African migrants in Israel. Then after that you wrote: don't change the subject. How can I change the subject when I have not even wrote about that subject anywhere?

I hope to get an answer from you soon.

With regards --The Nerd from Earth (talk) 00:13, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I happen to like Israel, and I do not have anything against Israel. But, still, I do not understand the reason why you have contacted me in the first place, and why you have said that I am against Israel? Also, I do not remember that I have written anything against Israel. I understand that there are a lot of people and media that are talking against Israel, but I am not one of those people that do that. I am a person that knows many things about Israel, and that those things are more positive then in many other countries. For example, I know that the human rights in Israel are better in some regards then in many member states of the EU and also many federal states of the USA. A good example are LGBTIQ rights. There are a lot of famous LGBTIQ people in Israel, like Yehonathan Gatro, Ivri Lider, Amir Fay Guttman, Harel Skaat and Dana International that have achieved great popularity as singers in Israel. For that I know, Israel is the only country on the world that has so many famous LGBTIQ singers. My opinion is that Israel is because of that a better country then most countries on Earth.
Now, like I said in the first message, I do not know the reason why you have contacted me in the first place, since I have not written anything against Israel, or about African immigrants in Israel. Because of that I would like that you would reply to me why you have contacted me? If you would like to be friends with me, I would be really happy about it. But, if you have contacted me to accuse me of something that I have not done, then I must complain about that, then like I said already, I have not written anything against Israel or about African immigrants to Israel.
With regards --The Nerd from Earth (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear פארוק

[edit]

I am a very nice person who always takes care of the feelings of other people, but not only that, I am also a Pacifist and a Vegetarian. I must say that I am really confused because of the messages that you have been leaving on My talk page. I really do not understand them, or what you are wanting to say with them. I am not against the State of Israel and I am not against the Hebrew ethnic group. I have never ever written anything on any language Wikipedia against the State of Israel, or against the Hebrew ethnic group. Also, I have never ever written anything on any language Wikipedia about any Immigrants to the State of Israel from any Country on any language Wikipedia.

On that base, I would really appreciate it if you would explain your messages to me, but not with your old messages but with a new one.

In advance, Thank you for reading my messages, and I hope that you will answer them on a professional and civil way without any anger or resentment with a new message that would not be to much similar to the old ones.

Sincerely, --The Nerd from Earth (talk) 16:30, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. I understand what you said in you last message. I also understand that there is a lot of propaganda against the State of Israel and against the Hebrew ethnic group, but still, I must confess that I still do not understand what the reason is that you contacted me. Like I said already, I have never written anything against the State of Israel and against the Hebrew ethnic group or about African immigrants to Israel. I have really not. That is what I am saying. I have not done that. So why have you contacted me because of that and accused me of something that I have obviously not done? I would really like you to answer that question to me.
Sincerely, --The Nerd from Earth (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Dear פארוק, I am not offended. I just did not understand, and I still do not, why you have contacted me in the first place. I am not against Israel or against the Hebrew ethnic group, and I have never ever written anything against them, or about African immigrants to Israel.. I like Israel and the Hebrew ethnic group very much. I know a lot about them, and I wish to go to Israel someday when I have enough money. Like I said before if you wish to be friends with me then I would wish that too.
Sincerely, --The Nerd from Earth (talk) 23:32, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

[edit]

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Israel for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 04:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 04:08, 25 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]
Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at WP:REFUND.
Message added 10:10, 30 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

August 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Jerusalem, makes articles harder to read. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Images should not be placed at the very top of an article, this is in accordance to the guidelines which can be found at WP:MOS and WP:IMAGES. If you wish to add the images to the article again, please make sure they are added to the appropriate sections to which they are referring to. Wesley Mouse 08:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks at User talk:Wesley Mouse

[edit]

You are out of line here. You have made a bunch of claims, without substantiating them, and he had not even posted on the talk page you were talking about. His notice to you was about MOS, the format of information, not the content. You call a whole group of people anti-semites several times, and trolls, and accuse Mouse of attacking the article, whatever that means. This violates our policy on no personal attacks. If you have an issue, bring up the issue at the appropriate venue, but if you take this overly aggressive and obviously POV attitude and attack another user, you will be blocked. Consider this a final warning. There are proper ways to deal with disputes, and this isn't one of them. Dennis Brown - © Join WER 14:16, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Articles

[edit]

Hi Farouk! Do you have additional sources on those subjects? Articles cannot be written based on primary sources alone. Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 20:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but those websites simply aren't enough. It is necessary to have more sources, which are not connected to the subject.
בעברית: מצטער אבל הקישורים שנתת לא מספיקים. יש צורך במקורות נוספים, בעיקר כאלה שלא קשורים ישירות לנושא הערך.
Cheers, Ynhockey (Talk) 21:04, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Municipality of jerusalem has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Separate article not needed. Short topic adequately covered in Jerusalem article. Also, lack of proper capitalization ("jerusalem" should be "Jerusalem") makes linking to this "Main article" problematic.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hertz1888 (talk) 21:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at Basalisk's talk page.
Message added 22:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Basalisk inspect damageberate 22:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Types of cities by geographical region

[edit]

I assume you already know, but to answer your question, the admin userfied the article User:פארוק/Types of cities by geographical region. —Ynhockey (Talk) 07:29, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Jerusalem

[edit]

I reverted your recent edits at Jerusalem. First off, any material you add needs to be sourced (see WP:RS), otherwise it my be considered as your own original research (see WP:OR). Secondly, it may help to make used of your sandbox to work out any copy editing that needs to be done before you add material to an article. If English is not your first language, you might be able to make use of WP:Babel to help with translations. Resources such as WP:Reference desk/Language and WP:WikiProject Grammar may be able to provide helpful tools as well. -asad (talk) 20:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on World Bible Center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Beastiepaws (talk) 10:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Office of the Prime Minister (Israel)

[edit]

Please refer to the edit summary for my reason for reverting. Beastiepaws (talk) 11:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, פארוק. You have new messages at Hertz1888's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Mdann52 (talk) 19:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Bible Center for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Bible Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Bible Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 19:39, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shapira_neighborhood for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shapira_neighborhood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Shapira_neighborhood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Your actions and conduct have required me to ask for arbitration enforcement. Please see here. -asad (talk) 14:21, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, פארוק, you should stop creating maximum drama on Talk:Jerusalem and deal with this. Beastiepaws (talk) 08:42, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding new articles

[edit]

Hi Farouk! In the last few days I have been wikifying articles on Wikipedia and have noticed that many articles on WikiProject Israel requiring wikification were created by you. What's more, most if not all of them seem like machine translations (e.g. Google Translate) from the Hebrew Wikipedia. Please don't create articles using only machine translations, as they are usually incomprehensible and don't help readers. Thanks, Ynhockey (Talk) 07:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

שלום, בימים האחרונים ראיתי מכוון של ערכים שנפתחו על ידך אבל נראה שרובם ככולם הם העתק-הדבק של תרגומי מכונה (כמו Google Translate או בבילוןן) ולא ניתנים כלל לקריאה, וגם לא מפורמטים בצורה נכונה. שים לב שאין בשום אופן להתשמש רק בתרגום מכונה על מנת ליצור ערכים. —Ynhockey (Talk) 07:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Kiryat HaLeom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch and Israeli (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:01, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Operation Boatswain

[edit]

Please stop replacing good English with bad. I just spend hours researching and re-writing that article. Beastiepaws (talk) 05:45, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the future, simply reverting such vandalism would be appropriate. I've warned you before about soap-boxing on that page, and further nonsense may result in your being blocked. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:47, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jerusalem

[edit]

I'm sorry, but I have had to strike out your comments on the talk page. You are bespattering a difficult arguments with your private opinions, which happen to be totally errant historically. (I.e. if you write:'Don't forget that those who designed the borders of the Middle East today are English and French by their Christian interests', you are only inviting someone to remind you that Israel's borders in the Middle East were not designed by the French or the English. Please desist from this annoying intrusiveness, unless you have some technical input or information from reliable sources. No one reads what you write there, and no one replies to it, and you should get some message from that fact. Thank you Nishidani (talk) 20:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Mount Herzl

[edit]
I'm asking you and begging you, please !. do not delete an articles that has been proposed for deletion in the first time. I worked a lot of hours to find a sources of information to expand some articles, especially i working hours to expand many things about Mount Herzl with all the pictures that was there. פארוק (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Farook, I don't delete articles. All I can do is post an AfD, and an Admin makes the decision based on the discussion. Also, I appreciate that you want to expand articles, but your English isn't really up to this and you generate hours of work for other editors. I spent ages trying to turn what you write into good English, and for my trouble, you come on my talk page and abuse me. Beastiepaws (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry that i abuse you. but why you want to delet articles that was already been proposed for deletion ? . i don'd speak english. פארוק (talk) 07:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not explaining this any further. I stated my reasons in the AfD, and the discussions are archived if you want to read them again. Beastiepaws (talk) 22:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I'm looking for the page where i can see the articles that was deleted. Could you please refer me to this page ?. פארוק (talk) 06:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You asked this before and I told you. You have to ask an admin for help.
Admins who will provide copies of deleted articles Beastiepaws (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing was deleted here, there are no deleted revisions. To see what has happened in the past look at the history. To see how the article changed since Beastiepaws edited on 22 August see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mount_Herzl&diff=510014172&oldid=508575678. Also see Garden of the Missing Soldiers and http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=National_Memorial_Hall_%28Mount_Herzl%29&oldid=508555163 for other related content that is not deleted either but may exist in the history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I hope this article ==>>> Victims of Acts of Terror Memorial will not merged into other article.
The above discussion was copied from my talk page. PepperBeast (talk) 21:47, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Specialized cities

[edit]

Trticles that i wrote myself here and also in the Hebrew wikipedia was gone for the reasone it not have enough links, Although they still appear in the Hebrew version:

the second article was deleted while i am working to expand him by my geography books that i am study. I will try once again to look for another sources of information and to bring new writing here. פארוק (talk) 11:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I fear that we are wasting Beastiepaws' time by discussion on the talk page. Do you want userspace drafts of these two pages פארוק? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes please !. i want to please so I can upload this articles here again. פארוק (talk) 11:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You will have to promise not to upload them, but instead to fix them so that all the issues on the AFD are addressed first. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:38, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Garden of the Missing Soldiers , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Beastiepaws (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AE

[edit]

Per this, you are indefinitely banned from all articles and discussions covered under ARBPIA, broadly construed. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:42, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This means you may not discuss anything related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict anywhere on Wikipedia. That includes discussions on Jerusalem as capital of Israel or Palestine. Please do not continue violating your topic ban or you may be blocked from editing. nableezy - 16:40, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Israel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 20:33, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Nomination of Beit David neighborhood for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beit David neighborhood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beit David neighborhood until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

World Bible Center

[edit]

I have noticed bias against Israel related topics from the nominating editor. One option for the deleted article is to merge the content into a larger article. In the article you mentioned Bible Hill. Is there anything else on Bible Hill that could be worth writing about? In any case keep yor eye open for more references, or any news of an actual start to construction. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:30, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While you're noting my "bias" against Israel-related articles, you might also take note of the work I've been doing on Israel-related articles. Beastiepaws (talk) 20:25, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Graeme, I can't see what made you say that I have a "bias against Israel related topics..". Please explain. Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's quite simple, World Bible Center is an Israel related topic, it was nominated for deletion. What I actually suspect is that Farooq writes mostly Israel related articles, and what I see is people nominating the articles here for deletion. Giving the impression that these kind of article have a bias against them by those that want them deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:40, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Gilabrand, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 21:55, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bauhaus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ron Arad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are two people called Ron Arad in Wikipedia, you very likely mean a specific on of them rather than any of them or all of them. One article is Ron Arad (pilot). Another article is Ron Arad (industrial designer) who is also an architect. You probably want the second one, so edit the link to look like this [[Ron Arad (industrial designer)|]] in Bauhaus. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A/E

[edit]

See here. -asad (talk) 22:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action, as you did at User talk:Asad112. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:06, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I support this block. And given the general level of disruption caused by the user, including that they violate community bans, and then when challenged on it, they remove the evidence rather than responding appropriately, and that fellow Hebrew speaking users have made several requests to this user to stop participating on en-Wiki, I feel the user is not of net benefit to the project, so if they withdrew the legal threat, and requested an unblock, I would be inclined to decline the request. SilkTork ✔Tea time 13:26, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Some people here are sending Antisemitic messages against Israel and against the jews especially !!!. i never threat here to nobody !!!. i see this blocking as an antisemitic blocking !!! and nothing else.פארוק (talk) 13:37, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Give it a rest. You threatened Asad112. Here is the threat. PepperBeast (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have a question to User talk:Dbachmann but i did not get an answear from him. i asq why i get a warning on my page while this page did not get anny warning ? .... i just want to kmow. פארוק (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You didn't get a warning; you got a suggestion. I don't why you got one and Asad didn't, but I can say that you did a great deal to call attention to yourself. PepperBeast (talk) 21:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I got a message ===>>> UP ON MY PERSONAL PAGE just because i wrote something about my capital. however, he did not receive any message on in his personal page. פארוק (talk) 22:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I understand that, and I told you what I thought. PepperBeast (talk) 02:35, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your editing in other language wikipedia.

[edit]

Please stop your editing immediately!

You are acting in 131 projects. But your many articles are created with machine translation. You do not understand their languages.

Your behavior is very annoying for us and other Hebrew-users.--Ashtray (talk) 15:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

פארוק (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

original unblock reason

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Unblocks do not begin as a discussion: you read WP:GAB. You consider very carefully if you a) can be unblocked based on the problems that led to it, b) ever should be unblocked. You then formulate a GAB-compliant unblock request - nothing blank. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:16, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your reason for why you should be unblocked? Mdann52 (talk) 13:37, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I talked about my blocking with a few people here and i wanted to talk over about my block again. i think there is a misunderstanding and I'm sorry if I offended anyone. i want to come back and writte here a new articles in english. i promise not to argue with no one here. פארוק (talk) 14:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pinhas Kopel for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pinhas Kopel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pinhas Kopel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, פארוק, I was wondering where you got these figures, do you have a source where we can link to? Lotje (talk) 09:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Irregular pattern model for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Irregular pattern model is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Irregular pattern model until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ELEKHHT 10:42, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kiryat Atidim has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  » Shadowowl | talk 19:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can't use Google Translate to create articles

[edit]

Yefet Street: Google Translate is NOT a good tool, it creates a mess with more than 50% being unintelligible and therefore USELESS, or directly WRONG and MISLEADING. You can't do that, it is totally unacceptable. Nobody is obliged to write fluently in English, there's no shame in it, but if you don't, edit in Hebrew and leave English Wiki alone and people will be grateful. Thanks. Arminden (talk) 00:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bustan (garden) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bustan (garden) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bustan (garden) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Kazamzam (talk) 15:10, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]