User talk:Товболатов/Archive

WikiEditor1234567123

Товболатов Can you explain to me why do you make false accusations of me? You're saying I do Sockpuppetry, that I steal Chechen history even though I explained to you that our history is shared (Durdzuks are ancestors of both Chechens and Ingushes). If you are muslim then you should know that false accusing is not permissible in Islam. Tell me where did I steal chechen history? Last time I asked, you stopped answering me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiEditor1234567123 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Товболатов, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:47, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Murtazeki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Border Troops. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Khankala (1807)

На русском статья будет? --Simba16 (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ханкальское сражение (1807) - Simba16 I already have the author in Russian)).--Товболатов (talk) 08:51, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simba16 вы находитесь в английской википедии пишите на английском))) --Товболатов (talk) 08:54, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Simba16 позже штурм Герменчука добавлю.--Товболатов (talk) 10:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No ground charges

I suggest you don't blame me for what I didn't do. You slandered me in the Russian Wikipedia, although you yourself are a virtual who, under the Russian Wikipedia account, will introduce a war of edits and vandalism in Ingush articles. However, to avoid an edit war, I won't edit "Chechens" for the time being, and you too will refrain from vandalizing the Russian Wikipedia. Niyskho (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Your recent editing history at Ingush people shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:39, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will not participate in the war, I will wait for the decision of the administration.Товболатов (talk) 17:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SarekOfVulcan (talk) saw sorry Товболатов (talk) 17:50, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

SarekOfVulcan (talk) Pay attention, he continued to break the rules despite your warning.Товболатов (talk) 17:53, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magomed Shataev has been accepted

Magomed Shataev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ymblanter (talk) 07:20, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Товболатов!

Happy New Year!

Товболатов,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 17:58, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Abishe Thanks for the congratulations, congratulations on 2023!--Товболатов (talk) 18:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Nazran conflict

Hello Товболатов. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Nazran conflict, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. BangJan1999 20:53, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BangJan1999 You know that deleting a template has a consequence?? --Товболатов (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BangJan1999 Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dzurdzuketi You see that the administrators are checking there.--Товболатов (talk) 21:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Adermakh

Hello Товболатов. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Adermakh, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: You don't have to be an admin to know that speedy deletion only covers very specific criteria of which "minimal research" is not one of them. Also, if someone contests a speedy deletion, don't re-add it, instead use other methods of deletion like Proposed Deletion or Articles for Deletion. Thank you. BangJan1999 21:03, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BangJan1999 Hello, yes I have corrected it. See the discussion pages of these articles for this fake.--Товболатов (talk) 21:10, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Creating The Grozny oil region (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Largely unsourced

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Creating The Grozny oil region and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Товболатов! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Source [3] needs to be removed per WP:CIRCULAR. Other than that it's also largely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:30, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Товболатов. Thank you for your work on Chechen lighthouse. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nazran conflict. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vieta (dish

A tag has been placed on Vieta (dish requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

indefinitely topic-banned from articles related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construed

You have been sanctioned for tendentious editing across multiple articles, particularly this editing spree on February 16 (Special:Diff/1139722862, Special:Diff/1139722968, Special:Diff/1139723019, Special:Diff/1139723084, Special:Diff/1139723110, Special:Diff/1139723167, Special:Diff/1139723254, Special:Diff/1139723211). This comes after several days of warnings for borderline edit warring, insults, and frivolous demands for administrator intervention. It is important to note that it is not your position on Chechen-Ingush identity that led to this sanction, but specifically your method in pursuing your desired changes to articles. Spamming the same text across a half dozen pages that you know are subject to an ongoing dispute with another editor is incompatible with a constructive editing environment.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern Europe#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:56, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR

Hello, Товболатов. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Creating The Grozny oil region

Hello, Товболатов. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Creating The Grozny oil region, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lighthouse of Lierna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lighthouse of Lierna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lighthouse of Lierna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:29, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about this, I'm assuming from your contributions here that you're not connected to the long-term hoax editor who created the same page on other projects. Please note that if you copy or translate text from another page in this project, or from a page in another Wikipedia, you must provide attribution for the work of those who created that content (even if they're globally-locked sockpuppets!). Please see here for details and guidance, and this section in particular for translated content. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:56, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR

Hello, Товболатов. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Restoration of the Chechen-Ingush ASSR".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:37, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Creating The Grozny oil region

Hello, Товболатов. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Creating The Grozny oil region".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:00, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alan Fearnley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alan Fearnley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Fearnley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Oaktree b (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on two articles you created

Good day. I see that you have not been notified of this discussion: WT:WikiProject_Ships#Two_poor_quality_articles. The concerns there are that the content duplicates existing articles, and the writing is not idiomatic English. Feel free to participate in the discussion. Kablammo (talk) 12:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tea race (competitions) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tea race (competitions) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tea race (competitions) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Race Cutty Sark and Thermopylae for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Race Cutty Sark and Thermopylae is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race Cutty Sark and Thermopylae until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I just thought I should add a note of apology that your editing efforts have met with a total of three articles proposed for deletion – two of them put forward by me.

Sometimes the processes of Wikipedia can appear horribly unkind and I think this is one of them. Please do not be disheartened. If you have made the effort to get this far, I am sure you can continue to play a part in the Wikipedia project. ThoughtIdRetired (talk) 19:35, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ThoughtIdRetired Thanks for your apology, I understand.--Товболатов (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo Balbi Piovera Raggio

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 13:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ancestral tower

Hello Товболатов

Can you provide the coordinates for Курчалоевской башни ?

Thanks. Kablammo (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kablammo Hi, I'll get the coordinates. There doesn't seem to be an article about her.--Товболатов (talk) 18:27, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Kablammo tower coordinates — 43.021658, 46.196931.
  - Thank you. I had suspected that was it but was not sure. Best wishes, Kablammo (talk) 19:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your tireless contributions in expanding the coverage of Italian architecture on English Wikipedia! SSR07 (talk) 00:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, it's nice to get some appreciation! In 2014 visited many cities in Italy I liked the urban architecture. Товболатов (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Casa Atellani

If this was translated from another language, do you think you could complete the template to identify which language/article you used as a source? Thanks - I've reviewed it for now... Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thank you.--Товболатов (talk) 15:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Palazzo dei Vescovi a San Miniato al Monte, if you wouldn't mind? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:49, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All right. There weren't more sources in the article, yes you need to look it up but that's separate I'll get to it later.--Товболатов (talk) 11:14, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Same for Palazzo Castani - every translation requires an attribution and "translated from nl.wiki" is NOT cutting the mustard for Italian articles. I'm sure @Mccapra didn't mean flag 'em all with that one line - you need to modify the template to show the language and article source!!! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:53, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandermcnabb can you show me an example of the template here, please I will add it. Where to add it to the discussion page, or at the first edit of the article. specify the author of the article and the language. I got it. --Товболатов (talk) 08:36, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. In the first edit summary when you create the page, you can add: "Content in this edit is translated from the existing (xxxx) Wikipedia article at xx:name of article; see its history for attribution." You'd for instance replace xxxx with French and xx with fr (for fr wiki). You can also add {{Translated page|fr|Exact name of the French article}} (replacing fr and French with the language you're translating from) to the talk page. Where you haven't already added the language in your first edit summary, I'd suggest just doing an additional edit now and adding that text above, which gives everyone access to the original article, its attributions etc. There's more on this at Help:Translation. Enjoy!!! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:16, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I added both to the Casa Atellani article as an example for you! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:22, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll look into it. well this is the kind of template I will add when new translated articles are first edited. I was told it can be done on the talk page or on the first edit. --Товболатов (talk) 09:27, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Товболатов. Thank you for your work on Bicocca degli Arcimboldi. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating and expanding the article on Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

SunDawn hi, good to see you again. Thank you for the nice wishes. You have previously viewed and thanked me for this article Chechen lighthouse. You could check it, otherwise it still weighs unrecognised, you can put the start.--Товболатов (talk) 16:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:44, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The second source was added by me in the references. I added it as a note. Alexandermcnabb --Товболатов (talk) 18:25, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AE appeal

Hi, I'm sorry to tell you that your appeal of your topic ban has been declined. Reviewing administrators were concerned that you aren't able to communicate clearly in English or follow Wikipedia norms. While not your fault, this is nonetheless a major problem when making controversial edits in contentious areas. Administrators also felt that you had not explained why the topic ban was no longer necessary or how you would avoid problems if it was lifted. With apologies, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:57, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HJ Mitchell thank you for your apology, I really don't know how to explain any more. I don't make a tragedy out of it. Товболатов (talk) 12:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati) has been accepted

Palazzo Donati (gia Albergoni, Vimercati), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 03:54, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Вопрос

Ассаламу алейкум ва рахматтулахи ва баракатух @Товболатов. У тебя случайно нету доступа к Национальной электронной библиотеке ЧР? Это единственная библиотека в интернете (по крайней мере, я эту книгу только там нашёл), которая имеет при себе ценный труд^[a] про ингушского революционера Гапура Ахриева, и мне как раз нужен этот труд для создания статьи про Гапура. С уважением, WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 10:55, 20 October 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Notes

^ Ахриев, И. Г. (1967). Гапур Ахриев. Грозный: Чечено-Ингушское книжное издательство. pp. 1–44.

Ва1алейкум Ассалам, @WikiEditor1234567123 я посмотрю.--Товболатов (talk) 12:25, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violation of your topic ban from editing content related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construed on the page Artur Beterbiev, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:44, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Topic bans are broadly construed. You are not allowed to make edits relating to the ethnic identities of minorities of the former Soviet Union in any context on en.wiki. Arguing over whether Beterbiev's ethnicity should be included, and referencing the history of ethnic conflict in Dagestan on the talk page, are both violations of the ban. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 13:46, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, isn't he a Canadian citizen? Other participants told me that it has nothing to do with the Caucasus. A year has passed since you blocked the topic of the Caucasus for me. I did not violate any actions. I consider the blocking unjustified; I edited the page of a Canadian citizen. Товболатов (talk) 15:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicity is not the same as citizenship, and referencing the history of ethnic conflict in Dagestan is something else again. Hope that helps. Best -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention, this was a discussion on the discussion page, I added the link there. Товболатов (talk) 22:50, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stylez995 Hello, could you help me in this situation, I don’t know the rules in the English project very well. But I edited the page of a Canadian citizen. I added the link to the discussion Talk:Artur Beterbiev. Товболатов (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. When the topic ban includes "broadly construed" (also referred as "broadly interpreted") restriction, this restriction also covers attempting to "nibble around the edges" by not mentioning the topic directly, but editing or discussing in a way that can be interpreted as something to do with the topic. See Wikipedia:Broadly construed.

Until you have successfully appeal this topic ban, you must stay away from that topic anywhere on Wikipedia, with exceptions stated on WP:BANEX. Stylez995 (talk) 00:12, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stylez995 Thank you for your answer, a year has already passed and they should have removed my topic-ban. This was too severe a punishment for just sending spam (once). I think even if there was a violation, I was blocked for one or two days. No sanctions were applied to those who argued with me about removing information from articles. Although these disputes existed before and after me. It’s clear that this is a permanent block so that I don’t participate in editing. I filed an appeal, but it didn’t help, there were a lot of different clues to keep me from getting out of the block. Sincerely.Товболатов (talk) 08:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edits you made were specifically in relation to Beterbiev's identity as a Chechen, with you yourself arguing to include information about Beterbiev's Chechen origin. I find the suggestion that you don't understand this Canadian citizen's connection to the topic of ethnic minorities of the former Soviet Union to be utterly absurd. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:05, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Товболатов (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please copy my appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard or administrators' noticeboard. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. A year has passed since I was blocked on the topic of the former Soviet Union. I did not violate any actions. I consider the blocking to be unfounded; I edited the Canadian Citizen page. They should have warned me first, and not immediately blocked me. WikiEditor1234567123 Why is this man stalking me? 1, 2 At his request, I was banned from the topic on the USSR, now a year later, he again makes a complaint against me. Although I didn't communicate with him. This is a separate topic, he did not participate in the discussion. Here you can clearly see they want to block me forever as an unwanted user for him. Товболатов (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

There's no way to believably claim that "content related to ethnic minority groups in the former Soviet Union, broadly construed" does not include a person's identity as a Chechen, regardless of that person's citizenship. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 00:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[1] Ахриев, И. Г. (1967). Гапур Ахриев. Грозный: Чечено-Ингушское книжное издательство. pp. 1–44.

[a]