User talk:Niyskho

Movsar Evloev

Hi Niyskho, pls note that your edits on the above page has been reverted as Ingush is not a recognized country by the world. Pls do not change it again. Cassiopeia talk 23:58, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Empty edit request at Talk:Ingush_people

Hello. An edit request you recently made to Talk:Ingush_people was empty and has been removed. Please see planning an edit request for more information on how to prepare a proper request. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you, ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Blocking bypass. Thank you.User:Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 22:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This person is the owner of several accounts, he introduced edit wars in the "Russian Wikipedia", and accused absolutely everyone of Vandalism. Communicated rudely with other users.

Here are his accounts:

1)Товболатов

2)Takhirgeran Umar

3)Russian viki

I also ask you to contact an experienced user under the nickname Anceran, he has 11 years of experience on Wikipedia, and will confirm the violation by the user Товболатов

This person is trying to slander me, and is trying his best to block me. He used different accounts in the section on "deleting an article about the Ingush in Turkey" (Russian Wikipedia)

Niyskho (talk) 23:42, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Label

You have already been marked as a many-sided virtual. This is seen by patrollers, administrators in the Russian Wikipedia marked you, this is reflected in other projects. Don't worry about me, I don't have such a mark, i didn't break the rules of puppetry like you. --Товболатов (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

По поводу Товбулатова

Могу сказать что я не имею доказательств что 1 и 2 это одно и тоже лицо. Такхигеран или Дагиров по крайней мере грамотно пишет и образован в отличие от Товбулатова. У последнего очень много других доказанных страниц виртуала и вандальных правок. Как правило они истеричные в плане его комментариев и постоянные намеки на какой то заговор вселенского масштаба и какая то необъяснимая маниакальная ненависть к ингушским и дагестанским статьям.—Anceran (talk) 18:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Из-за его действий блокируется множество невиновных пользователей, и вас он обвиняет в вандализме. Я думаю, что админы должны наконец наказать этого участника. Niyskho (talk) 01:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anceran Вы могли бы поддержать меня в данном обсуждении? тут, тот самый вандал и провокатор Товболатов пытается оклеветать меня со своими коллегами по анти-ингушскому вандализму. Niyskho (talk) 00:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

К Ингушам и Ингушетии это не имеет никакого отношения, я уважаю ингушей и у меня очень много друзей среди ингушей с которыми я учился в школе и интитуте. Не нужно было меня оскорблять в русской википедии со своей куклы.--Товболатов (talk) 14:19, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Я тоже уважаю Чеченцев и Чечню, но то что творил тот же Reiner в английской статье про ингушей, просто немыслимо. В любом случае меня уже заблокировали, и видимо мне больше не суждено вносить вклад в развитие ингушских статей, поэтому я лишь попрошу вас user:Товболатов ради Всевышнего оставить статьи про ингушей и Ингушетию, пусть ими занимаются сами ингуши, и решайте все по честному без дешёвого нацизма. Дал аьту болб бусулб наха. Делайте свою работу честно и справедливо, Ас саламу Алейкум, увидимся когда нибудь. Niyskho (talk) 15:53, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Teip, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shahar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Lemonaka (talk) 02:28, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Reiner Gavriel (talk) 21:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Niyskho. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Важный диалог.

Здравствуйте брат user:Adam-Yourist, некоторые недоброжелатели хотят обвинить меня в вандализме и заблокировать в английской Википедии за то что я стараюсь добавить в некоторые статьи про ингушей объективную информацию, вы могли бы поддержать меня в данной ситуации? тут Niyskho (talk) 22:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Niyskho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Completely unresolved issue. Niyskho (talk) 23:08, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 23:23, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Niyskho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked due to multiple accounts. I admit that I made a big mistake using multiple accounts, but I didn't try to do edit wars with them. From now on, I will try not to violate the rules of Wikipedia, I guarantee that I will add only useful and necessary information to Wikipedia (although I did). I was a victim of the situation, and because of my non-payment, I ended up in such a difficult situation. Therefore, I ask you to unblock me, for the first and last time. Niyskho (talk) 23:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Personal attacks in Russian are not particularly conducive to a successful unblock request. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Rosguill

You apparently mixed up the text, here is my request for unlocking:

«Blocked due to multiple accounts. I admit that I made a big mistake using multiple accounts, but I didn't try to do edit wars with them. From now on, I will try not to violate the rules of Wikipedia, I guarantee that I will add only useful and necessary information to Wikipedia (although I did). I was a victim of the situation, and because of my non-payment, I ended up in such a difficult situation. Therefore, I ask you to unblock me, for the first and last time.»

TPA revoked.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]