User talk:Бутывский Дмитрий
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Даймабад to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Veggies (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Даймабад. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Daimabad. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Daimabad. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:00, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm Mr. Vernon. I noticed that you recently removed content from Dean Schneider without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mr. Vernon (talk) 14:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dean_Schneider - --Бутывский Дмитрий (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Mr. Vernon, Бутывский Дмитрий correctly removed a WP:BLPRS violation in Special:Diff/952087294. Please see WP:RSN § Epistle News for Dean Schneider for details. — Newslinger talk 15:31, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support. I looked at both the article and the video and immediately realized that this is clearly no proof, but just a fake, sketch, maybe even a goal of extortion. It's no secret that Dan Schneider was rich only in the beginning. Today they are extremely vulnerable in financial terms, money from savings has long run out, they are even building now manually, without any equipment at all. There aren't even any concrete mixers. And all his hope is on the Internet platforms, on the help of caring people. And then there are obvious lies, attracting nonexistent cases to Dean, and so on. In General, the authority of the link-fake no, definitely delete and do not restore.--Бутывский Дмитрий (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. If you ever have any questions about editing Wikipedia, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. — Newslinger talk 03:51, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for your support. I looked at both the article and the video and immediately realized that this is clearly no proof, but just a fake, sketch, maybe even a goal of extortion. It's no secret that Dan Schneider was rich only in the beginning. Today they are extremely vulnerable in financial terms, money from savings has long run out, they are even building now manually, without any equipment at all. There aren't even any concrete mixers. And all his hope is on the Internet platforms, on the help of caring people. And then there are obvious lies, attracting nonexistent cases to Dean, and so on. In General, the authority of the link-fake no, definitely delete and do not restore.--Бутывский Дмитрий (talk) 16:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!
[edit]Hello! Бутывский Дмитрий,
you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 15:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Бутывский Дмитрий, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.
I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Dean Schneider, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)
In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.
Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! TJMSmith (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
Dean Schneider
[edit]Hi, I just wanted to let you know that the animal. Abuse allegations have been added back to the article as they are now covered by reliable sources. See: Flanagan, Jane (2020-05-01). "Instagram's lion king Dean Schneider risks wrath of the pride by punching cub on video". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 2020-05-01. Retrieved 2020-05-01. I ask that you don't remove the allegations again, since they can no longer be considered to be violating BLP guidelines. Kind regards Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:52, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- Hemiauchenia No problem, but I explain that at this moment Nayla is hugging Dean in the nature reserve, and Nayla is now twice the size of Dean. News to put it mildly not one day, a lot of water has flowed since then.--Бутывский Дмитрий (talk) 18:11, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
May 2020
[edit]Hello, I'm David Gerard. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dean Schneider, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not use The Sun or The Daily Mail as a source on living biographies - they are deprecated sources, and should not be used on living biographies. David Gerard (talk) 20:21, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
Hello Бутывский Дмитрий. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Бутывский Дмитрий. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Бутывский Дмитрий|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 20:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
- User:David_Gerard I'm a Russian Wikipedia Patroller. I have no financial interests, I write only on a voluntary basis. You don't have and can't have any evidence that I get paid for anything. Because I don't get paid. Yes, I'm attentive, persistent, and I don't like haters. Dean Schneider is a popular man, an animal rights activist, and a great guy, so I'm keeping an eye on this article. Haters against Dean Schneider work clumsily, taking half the information out of their own links and putting it in an article about Dean. This is not allowed by Wikipedia policy.--Бутывский Дмитрий (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
February 2024
[edit]Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Dean Schneider. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ybllaw (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2024 (UTC)