User talk:ΨΨΨ

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mini Schengen (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mini Schengen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! ΨΨΨ, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 17:48, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ubuntu (operating system), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 18:17, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sources you provided. I retract the above warning as now it's clear that you weren't trying to be disruptive. If you want to contact me, you could just post directly on my talk page next time. Cheers! -- Chamith (talk) 18:35, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thnx :) I just saw your message so sorry I didn't respond earlier! ΨΨΨ (talk) 17:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mini Schengen concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mini Schengen, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mini Schengen

Hello, ΨΨΨ. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mini Schengen".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm BilCat. Your recent edit to the page Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 01:23, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Masumrezarock100. Your recent edit to the page Deity appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 12:57, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Deity. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 13:09, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Target instant payment settlement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Target instant payment settlement, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bada Kaji (talk) 11:13, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Target instant payment settlement moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Target instant payment settlement, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 15:01, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, and thank you for your help.

All information is referenced though, with a link of the source. Problem is that it is all from only one (though very credible) source: the ECB.

I will expand and improve the article more with more sources too and hopefully this will be accepted then :-)

Regards. ΨΨΨ (talk) 07:16, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Target instant payment settlement

Hello, ΨΨΨ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Target instant payment settlement, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Target instant payment settlement

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Target instant payment settlement has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

God

You are here since 2016 or longer, and don't know that facts have to come with a reference, that the lead is a summary, and if you are reverted you best take a topic to the article talk page??? WP:BRD is a good idea. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:22, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to reference a statement that 2>1, nor for this elementary logical statement. In fact, when I got Logic at Mathematics at the Uni, this was one of the first examples!ΨΨΨ (talk) 12:25, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to European Payments Initiative, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 09:50, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes apology. I thought it would be the next screen to fill in the purpose.

Btw, your edit borders vandalism and is surely not adequate! ΨΨΨ (talk) 09:53, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your second sentence above. Removing sourced content and sources should have a valid reason/explanation in the wp:edit summary. Reverting such removal is perfectly acceptable. PayGeek did not cite RS, so removal is quite acceptable there as well. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 10:59, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]