Jump to content

User talk:"Yahia"

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Yahia.Mokhtar, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Yahia.Mokhtar! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haldane's decompression model (May 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winner 42 was:
The article is very good in its current state, but the lead needs to be changed so that it clarifies what the article is about. The lead should talk about the model first and Haldane and his paper only as they are important to the model.
You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Winner 42 Talk to me! 17:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haldane's decompression model has been accepted

[edit]
Haldane's decompression model, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TKK! bark with me! 01:05, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richard Pyle (June 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joseph2302 was:
This appears to be 2 articles in one. Assuming it's meant to be about Pyle Stops, then we don't want a whole section about Richard Pyle, a couple of lines would be fine- I'd suggest a lead section along the lines of "Pyle's stops are...... They were named after Richard Pyle, ...." Either way, there's not enough reliable sources to show significant, independent coverage, as required by WP:GNG.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Joseph2302 (talk) 14:05, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I've also moved the draft back to Draft:Pyle stops. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyle stop (July 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rhumidian was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Pyle stop instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rhumidian (talk) 16:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pyle stop has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pyle stop. Thanks! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pyle stop concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pyle stop, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyle stop (February 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Decompression theory. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 14:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

[edit]
please help translate this message into the local language
The Cure Award
In 2015 you were one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs, and we would love to collaborate further.

Thanks again :) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 03:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pyle stop

[edit]

Hi Yahia.Moktar, I have looked at your draft for Pyle stop and would like to see it get into article space as a full article, rather than merge it into one of the decompression articles, which are getting a bit long. I asked Onel5969 where the problem is seen to lie, and their comment was that too much is unreferenced. I am going to take the liberty of adding {{citation needed}} to all the statements that are likely to be challenged, and if you can come up with acceptable references it should be possible to get the draft passed. Also if I find anything useful I will add it. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 12:25, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Peter (Southwood)
Excellent, I am happy to know this from you, as I became totally disappointed since the article got suspended in a deadline, and I stopped writing since then in English Wikipedia!! Great, just feel absolutely free to add {{citation needed}} and modify as much as it requires to get endorsed, then inform me (here) to take any remaining work to find out the pending citations before re-submission. I will be glad when it gets endorsed as an article, and then afterwards, I will need your suggestion for the next required dive-related topic to compile. I have the contact email of Richard Pyle if you need it. Cheers, --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 12:49, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked for references at a few places in the draft, I hope they are not too difficult to find. You may find something useful on the Rubicon Research Repository, and their reference materials are probably all either acceptable or better. Good luck, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 13:05, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Try this link http://archive.rubicon-foundation.org/xmlui/search?query=Pyle+stop&submit=Go Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 13:09, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Peter (Southwood)
Please have a look now. I added the required citations, and left your {{citation needed}} for reference till I received your feedback. Hopes it goes this time. --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 07:39, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will be away on business until Friday night, so may not get an opportunity to take a proper look for a few days.
Would you prefer me to make suggestions for improvements or just go ahead and make them in the draft? You can always modify or revert if you don't like them. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 08:05, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Would be excellent if you could go ahead and modify the draft or even change it totally, our aim is to get a useful article on this subject. Thanks Peter (Southwood). --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 08:11, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I will do so. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 14:53, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again Peter (Southwood). I am not sure if this is ok or no: we wanted to create an independent page titled "Pyle Stop". It has been created under the name of Pyle stop (Decompression) which is ok, but I am not quite sure about why I received this Speedy Deletion message for? here: Click here. --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 07:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Yahia.Moktar, The person who moved the draft into article space could not use Pyle stop as the name as that is already in use for a redirect. They moved it to Pyle stop (Decompression theory which is both slightly inappropriate as it is more a practical issue than theory, and a typographical error, as the closing bracket is missing. I moved it to the current location Pyle stop (Decompression) which is a bit better and an acceptable alternative search string. I have requested that the current redirect page Pyle stop be speedily deleted so the name can be available for the article now at Pyle stop (Decompression), which can then be moved to Pyle stop, where it belongs, as there is no ambiguity, and the current page will become a redirect. It is just administrative details which need admin tools which we do not have. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like it has been sorted out. Article is now at Pyle stop. Mission accomplished ;-) You are welcome to approach me to collaborate on other diving articles. Cheers, • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Peter (Southwood). Nice to see the page functional, and there are even some nice additions and a new diagram added to it :) Excellent. I am ready to start the next "diving" article, what are your suggestions? --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 14:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What seems interesting to you? • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 17:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Peter (Southwood), I am interrested in SCUBA, BSAC, Marine life, research,.. and maybe more. I may go this time for " Robert D. Workman", as I saw this article is requested. Shall I take it or some other subject? --Yahia.Mokhtar (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
If the subject interests you, go for it. Workman was one of the major decompression researchers, so establishing notability should not be a problem. You could start by putting together a list of publications. A lot of them will be at Rubicon Research Repository. If you find any interesting information on other diving subjects while researching Workman. either add it to a relevant article or make a note for future articles. • • • Peter (Southwood) (talk): 06:33, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Yahia.Mokhtar. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

fyi

[edit]

I have removed inactive tag from wikiproject oman - and am trying to do some tag maintenance JarrahTree 08:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being one of Wikipedia's top medical contributors!

[edit]
please help translate this message into your local language via meta
The 2016 Cure Award
In 2016 you were one of the top ~200 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. Thank you from Wiki Project Med Foundation for helping bring free, complete, accurate, up-to-date health information to the public. We really appreciate you and the vital work you do! Wiki Project Med Foundation is a user group whose mission is to improve our health content. Consider joining here, there are no associated costs.

Thanks again :-) -- Doc James along with the rest of the team at Wiki Project Med Foundation 18:08, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help verify translations of articles from Arabic

[edit]

Hello,

Would you be able to help evaluate the accuracy of translations of Wikipedia articles from Arabic to English Wikipedia?

File:Language icon.svg

This would involve evaluating a translated article on English Wikipedia by comparing it to the original Arabic article, and marking it "Pass" or "Fail" based on whether the translation faithfully represents the original. Here's the reason for this request:

There are a number of articles on English Wikipedia that were created as machine translations from different languages including Arabic , using the Content Translation tool, sometimes by users with no knowledge of the source language. The config problem that allowed this to happen has since been fixed, but this has left us with a backlog of articles whose accuracy of translation is suspect or unknown, including some articles translated from Arabic. In many cases, other editors have come forward later to copyedit and fix any English grammar or style issues, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the translation is accurate, as factual errors from the original translation may remain. To put it another way: Good English is not the same as good translation.

If you can help out, that would be great. Here's a sample of the articles that need checking:

All you have to do, is compare the English article to the Arabic article, and mark it "Pass" or "Fail" (templates {{Pass}} and {{Fail}} may be useful). (Naturally, if you feel like fixing an inaccurate translation and then marking it "Pass", that's even better, but it isn't required.)

If you can help, please let me know. Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 09:39, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mathglot: Great! Let me know from where to start, or pass me a list of affected articles. Most probably I would fix them one-by-one. --Yahia (talk) 10:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks very much for your reply. Can you start with the five listed above? We have more of them, if you'd like a longer list. Mathglot (talk) 10:49, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mathglot: the four articles are fixed. Show me the full list please. Thanks --Yahia (talk) 18:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, that's wonderful, thank you! The full list is below. (Please ignore the numbers on the left; that's just to help us report your results.) I've marked the four above that you've already looked at "Pass" to indicate your approval. As you go through the list, you can mark them using the templates {{pass}} and {{fail}} if you like, but you can just use your own words ("good/bad", "okay/no good") if you prefer. For the ones that fail, if you want to add a few words of commentary indicating what's wrong with the translation, that would be helpful, but it's not necessary. You can put that right on the same line with the "Fail" marker.
List of articles to check for accuracy of translation from Arabic
Thanks so much for doing this, it's really great that you can help. If it looks like too much work, please don't feel that you have to fix all these; it's fine just to mark them "Pass"/"Fail". But if you want to fix them as well, it's much appreciated. Mathglot (talk) 19:21, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Mathglot: this is regarding the above article: 1520 College Al-hussein Mosque. The article's name is not translated correctly and I need your advice to coin a proper one. A "high school" named "Al-Hussein's High school college" was built in 1949, then a mosque (the article's subject) was built next to it later in 1971. The Mosque took his name literally as: "The mosque of Al-Hussein's College". The transliterated name would be "Masjed Colliyat Al-Hussein". I am not sure (linguistic wise) how to translate the name:
  1. would it be: "Al-Hussein College Mosque".
  2. or, "Al-Hussein's College Mosque".
  3. or, "Al-Hussein College's Mosque".
  4. or, "Al-Hussein's College's Mosque".

Which name do you think should we select? The literally , transliterated or the translated? --Yahia (talk) 06:49, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yahia, Thank you for your question. I would choose #1, "Al-Hussein College Mosque."
The typical way to do this in English is to pile all the adjectives and adjectival nouns in the beginning, and no possessives, with the main topic noun in last position—the exact opposite of French for example.
One of the reasons French used to be the international language of diplomacy, is its relative unambiguity of expression, whereas English sometimes admits of ambiguity. For example, in #1, an English speaker could parse that as:
  • a "college mosque" named after Al Hussein
or as:
  • a mosque belonging to "Al Hussein College"
whereas French would have two different ways of saying this. As a native speaker of English, when you say, "Al-Hussein College Mosque," I would understand this as the 2nd bullet item, which I understand you to say is the correct interpretation. (In either case, no possessives.)
One thing that surprises me here is the use of the hyphen after the definite article "Al". This is a transliteration-stylistic question, not a grammatical one, and different English sources can have different style guides with different sets of rules about such things. I'll check tomorrow to verify, but it would appear that Wikipedia style is to hyphenate after "Al", which is somewhat of a surprise to me, as I do not hyphenate "Al Ahram" or "Al Qahira". Mathglot (talk) 08:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all the ones you've been doing; I'm adding your evaluations to the project. There's another batch now, would you like to take a look at some of them? Mathglot (talk) 09:26, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Mathglot: Of course, let me have a look at the new batch, however, I am still working on Suffah.

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Yahia.Mokhtar. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Yahia.Mokhtar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:%22Yahia%22&oldid=1137347828"