User talk:Soulbust/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Soulbust. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

2012 archive.

Welcome!

Hello, Soulboost, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hartz pet products, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hartz pet products

A tag has been placed on Hartz pet products requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 16:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2012 Manning sweepstakes

The article 2012 Manning sweepstakes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to satisfy WP:NOT#NEWS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terence7 (talk) 02:25, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lake Chad (Antarctica), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I'm sorry you're frustrated with Wikipedia, but please don't vent your frustration by vandalizing articles. —Darkwind (talk) 03:13, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Demetry James, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Joe Philbin has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:54, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fac3 JestRz Dance Crew.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! - Happysailor ^(Talk) 00:37, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Choco Listo

A tag has been placed on Choco Listo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. VQuakr (talk) 03:46, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of RevHoney

A tag has been placed on RevHoney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 05:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pro Angler Moves

A tag has been placed on Pro Angler Moves requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:53, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Soulbust (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Apparently, Eagles247 has blocked me for copyright information on Pro Angler Moves on March 27th, 2012. First, I would like to say that I did not copy & paste info from another website. I read the information from the website and did my best to re-write in my own words. Due to their being not that much information on Pro Angler Moves it was similar (but not exactly) to what the website had. Also you deleted Pro Angler Moves on March 19th, 2012. Why would you wait over a week to block me from editing? Please unblock me or provide further points of why I should be blocked indefinitely.

Accept reason:

Sorry about that. I saw Birds of Steel had a copyright violation on it and assumed you added it since you've had copyright troubles previously. On further review, an IP made the addition. I'm unblocking your account and offering my sincerest apologies for my mistake. Eagles 24/7 (C) 22:09, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Eagles247, its okay man. Thanks for the unblock Soulboost (talk) 22:12, 27 March 2012 (UTC)soulboost

Speedy deletion nomination of CrashCourse

A tag has been placed on CrashCourse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:14, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to CrashCourse with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. P0150neD r1Ce asian 23:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Organ Trail.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — ⊥ɥǝ Ǝɐɹʍıƃ ^(ʇɐlʞ) 20:32, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Waffle Shankers

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Waffle Shankers, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. →Σ τ c. 00:36, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Smosh does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! 117Avenue (talk) 07:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Revision history of Ray William Johnson. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. 117Avenue (talk) 04:09, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Soulboost/Yosbel Victores has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yosbel Victores, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Yosbel Victores.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! tausif 06:57, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wenis (Appendage)

The article Wenis (Appendage) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 16:12, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Taxi Dave

A tag has been placed on Taxi Dave requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 06:56, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elliott Morgan

A tag has been placed on Elliott Morgan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. bonadea contributions talk 07:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

A suggestion

Having just looked through your contributions and deleted contributions, may I suggest that you stop adding articles about yourself and your mates, and other equally non-notable subjects? Take some time out to look at what is acceptable on Wikipedia and what is not - and try to learn from the deletions you have already had. If you go on adding inappropriate pages, it could be regarded as vandalism and lead to you being blocked from editing. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a playground. Peridon (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Elliott Morgan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliott Morgan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Morgan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 18:04, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The GUNN Shop

A tag has been placed on The GUNN Shop requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Yash t 101 06:37, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: NBA Hoop Troop

Hello Soulboost. I am just letting you know that I deleted NBA Hoop Troop, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Raptor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Raptor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Raptor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 20:40, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Champ and Mavs Man for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Champ and Mavs Man is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champ and Mavs Man until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Salimfadhley (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Aaron Rodgers Day

The article Aaron Rodgers Day has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

possibly hoaxy, not enough for a CSD because of sources but still iffy

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lerdthenerd wiki defender 20:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Aaron Rodgers Day for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Rodgers Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Rodgers Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Lerdthenerd wiki defender 20:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jack Douglass

The article Jack Douglass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Absolutely no independent and reliable sources about him. The ref from his college paper doesn't exactly count. Except for three sentences, article is about his YouTube channel and not him. There needs to be refs about Douglass

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:42, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Toby Joe Turner

A tag has been placed on Toby Joe Turner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --JacktheHarry (talk) 17:51, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Lee Newton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lee Newton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lee Newton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Danorton (talk) 22:24, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jack Douglass for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Douglass is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Douglass until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 08:38, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rage Wars

The article Rage Wars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, consists significant guide content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otterathome (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stickly Jump Pro

The article Stickly Jump Pro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Otterathome (talk) 12:16, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gravonaut

The article Gravonaut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

advertisement, most sources appear to be self-published, to the game itself, or a link to buy

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DietFoodstamp (talk) 10:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Adding new content

Please stop adding non-notable fancruft and general guff to Wikipedia. Do take this as a second warning. First warning here.--Otterathome (talk) 16:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

You must be referring to Lee Newton and other internet culture articles I've put up. No I won't stop if it's notable. Lee Newton passed AfD, and my other internet culture articles such as Lloyd Ahlquist have had several reliable sources place in them. Why should I stop when you put up one of my articles for deletion and it was strongly seen as a keep? Soulboost (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

This is an on-going issue as evidenced on this talk page. Of the few pages you've created which haven't been deleted, most suffer from notability issues. New content you add also suffer similar problems, for example the ones you list on your user page:

Skid-steer loader - April 1, 2012 - uses a clearly unreliable source (wiki) for the information, not exactly encyclopedic info
Philip DeFranco - April 2, 2012 - most of the new content was barely on topic, and mostly unsourced.
Vlogbrothers - April 19, 2012 - can't see a major problem here, but notability of some content is questionable
Daniel Pinkwater - April 25, 2012 - some useful content, but huffingtonpost is a questionable source, and a youtube blogger definately shouldn't be used here (now removed)
Coby Fleener - April 27, 2012 - doesn't appear to be anything very wrong with this, but I'm not that familiar with the subject
Long Ding - May 5, 2012 - some useful stuff, but lots of unsourced stuff again
Aaron Rodgers - May 18, 2012 - all fine here.

You are encouraged to submit new pages through WP:AFC instead.--Otterathome (talk) 17:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

How very arrogant. Anyone can create articles, and you can't warn them not to. Take it to RFC or wherever, but you can't just say "I don't like your articles, please don't create more" in the form of a "warning" with the intent to threaten them of punishment if they don't do what you want. And there is no on-going issue as evidenced on this talk page for his created article you failed to get deleted. You ignore consensus at AFD, and insist the article isn't notable. Two people disagree with you on that, and have both removed the notability tag you have placed on the article. No one else has commented. You are encouraged to not harass other users like this. Its certainly not civil at all. Dream Focus 18:18, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Stop removing speedy deletes

This isn't the first time you have removed speedy delete messages. You recently did it again at Tobuscus Turner. Do not remove the message if you created the article. Also, if an article has already been speedied, don't create the exact same article under a different name such as Toby Joe Turner. Bgwhite (talk) 07:19, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Why? Turner deserves an article after being in films and a television series. I don't see why I should allow something be speedied when it shouldn't. Soulboost (talk) 07:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Also, yes I know what the speedy deletion article says but why can't the creator of the article take away the speedy?Soulboost (talk) 07:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

The instructions right in the speedy banner says, "...but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." Also, if you keep adding articles with no reliable references that don't go into any detail about the subject, the article will keep being deleted. Multiple people, including me, have asked you to add valid references. Bgwhite (talk) 07:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh, Turner hasn't been in any films or tv series. He has only created his own web episodes. Bgwhite (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

I guess this tv series and this film don't count anymore? I've never seen anyone tell me to add valid refs to that article. To my other articles, yeah I've seen that but I have added valid refs to my other articles to HuffPost, CBS, Adweek, Fox News, etc.... Soulboost (talk) 07:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

You just created the article. Only one person before me saw the article and they did a speedy. Hard for people to tell you to add valid refs when you just created it. I saw you added more "refs". Please add refs that actually mention him and don't add blogs. You are right, he did one small independent film. The TV show hasn't aired. I'm done with you right now. We've done this on other articles that were eventually deleted. You were argumentative and uncivil before and it looks like this is heading down the same area again. I don't want to play the same game again. Bgwhite (talk) 08:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

You are correct that the television show hasn't aired but it will... in two days on June 11th, 2012. The television show however has already aired a sneak peek. I don't remember being argumentative or uncivil in any conversation with you. I also don't remember any similar articles like this where I've spoken with you that have been deleted. I could be wrong about that but please provide some proof. I'm not sure how debating the notability with facts is uncivil. Turner deserves the article as he passes WP:ENT. He has over 900 million views spread through his 3 channels. He has over 1.8 million on his main channel alone. He has starred in a film, yes independent, I'm not sure how that degrades the quality or makes any less deserving of an article and he has been casted on a buzzed Cartoon Network television show that will air this upcoming Monday. Soulboost (talk) 08:45, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Karen Klein for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Klein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Klein until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SheepNotGoats (talk) 16:51, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Whiteboy7thst.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 19:45, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Krispy Kreme (rapper)

Please don't add anything to this biography of a living person which is not sourced to a reliable source. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

But his videos did go down on May 17, 2012. Soulboost (talk) 19:03, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:YouTube original channels

Template:YouTube original channels has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Otterathome (talk) 23:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shizuoka Gymrats

A tag has been placed on Shizuoka Gymrats requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 01:49, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of World Peace Before 2021

A tag has been placed on World Peace Before 2021 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Fly by Night (talk) 23:33, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of World Peace Before 2021 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Peace Before 2021 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Peace Before 2021 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Fly by Night (talk) 17:53, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of PewDiePie for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PewDiePie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PewDiePie until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 18:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Microwave This?

A tag has been placed on Microwave This? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Go Phightins! (talk) 21:46, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

sxephil

You have messed up the sxephil article so bad. Deleted sources that are fine, read WP:SELFPUB! So now we have lots of unsourced things. Added lots and lots of non-notable and unsourced stuff like all his other channels. You wrecked some of the small amount of somewhat good content there, and added loads of unwanted stuff at end. I might just revert all of your edits in one go. I have put lots of work into that.--Alizaa2 (talk) 11:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

I have reverted it all, as 90% of your changes were bad. I have restored what useful stuff you added.--Alizaa2 (talk) 11:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

90%? I added info and backed it up with reliable refs on The Station, Like Totally Awesome, his 2012 RNC&DNC appearance, his Shark Week hosting and you still delete everything except the LA Times article. I added back the RNC&DNC appearance and added back the Shark Week refs you took out. Soulboost (talk) 18:27, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

I have cleaned up your edits again, although I was able to keep most of it. Any remaining sources were left on the talk page.--Alizaa2 (talk) 09:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of YouTube 100

A tag has been placed on YouTube 100 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. TheChampionMan1234 03:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of It's My Life What Ever I Wanna Do

A tag has been placed on It's My Life What Ever I Wanna Do requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kürbis (✔) 12:47, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pewdie

Hello Soulboost,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pewdie for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:25, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Pewdie

Hello, Soulboost,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Pewdie should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pewdie .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Jrcrin001 (talk) 14:42, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dylan Jobe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page StarHawk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reply Girls

A tag has been placed on Reply Girls, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G12,A1,C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. IdanElh (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fine Brothers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Avatar (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NFL Top 100, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clay Matthews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Gentlemen's Rant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hipsters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gizmos (ExploreLearning)

A tag has been placed on Gizmos (ExploreLearning) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. - Mr X 01:49, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Obama Style, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page College Humor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan "Sparklez" Maron, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Usher and Psy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Jordan Maron for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Maron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Maron until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ‑Scottywong | gab _ 05:44, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012 United States Presidential election YouTube parodies, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Democrat, Republican and College Humor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited FPSRussia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Troop carrier (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

Toby Tobuscus

I have deleted this per WP:CSD#G4 repost of deleted material. Articles about this person have been deleted many, many times. For some relevant entries, see:

If you think you can show notability, the only way you will get an article published is by making a user-space draft and going back to WP:Deletion review for permission to publish it. JohnCD (talk) 18:16, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

	Christmas cookies, anyone?
	Merry Christmas! Here's some Christmas cookies to celebrate with! Zappa O Mati 17:35, 25 December 2012 (UTC)