User talk:Retired username

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

I am no longer an active editor of Wikipedia.

Noooooooooooooo!!!

What a loss to Wikipedia. Xoloz, trial and now it's you. Why do all good people leave within such a short time? How DRV backlog, AfD backlog be solved without you? Plz don't leave! @pple complain 17:23, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry to hear it. Then again, with as much crap as you had to deal with, I'm not too surprised. I wish you well, and hope that someday we might meet in real life.--Bedford 19:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sad to see this too. I'd actually come here because I wanted to say I'd realized that you were right and I was wrong about the zombies. Too late to apologize, it seems, but I'm sorry nonetheless. The good fight will be a little bit harder without you here. --JayHenry (talk) 19:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We've disagreed sometimes in the past, but that doesn't change the fact that you've been a great contributor. I'm sorry to see you go, and wish you well in your real life endeavours, wherever they may take you. Best regards, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 22:13, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well hell. I'm back and a lota' the admins I respected are gone. This kinda' bites, man. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 21:30, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Annie on my mind.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Annie on my mind.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of City of Refuge (band)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article City of Refuge (band), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram (talk) 13:49, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you an admin?

Are you an admin anymore? Dumpcircle (talk) 14:49, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

He has retired. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:59, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of nomination for deletion of Night flight in the UK

This is to inform you that this article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Night flight in the UK. - Ahunt (talk) 23:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, University of Louisville School of Medicine

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, University of Louisville School of Medicine. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - University of Louisville. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at University of Louisville - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Mdann52 (talk) 16:14, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cars.com

The article Cars.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mostly self-published sources, the NYtimes appears to be a blogpost while the Adweek one doesn't appear to be relevant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bjelleklang - talk 14:46, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cars.com for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cars.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cars.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 17:56, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. XOttawahitech (talk) 20:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Assumption high school.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Audubon elementary.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:25, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Battle of corydon marker.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:57, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Beargrass creek preserve.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:52, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EDWinXP (2nd nomination)

FYI - since you've previously edited the article. Bazj (talk) 11:52, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comedy Corner

The article Comedy Corner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost unreferenced spam about a non-notable organisation

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 00:00, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Comedy Corner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Comedy Corner, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comedy Corner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comedy Corner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comedy Corner (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Maproom (talk) 08:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bergen, the geographical name listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bergen, the geographical name. Since you had some involvement with the Bergen, the geographical name redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. shoy (reactions) 19:21, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man, just now u just ruined ruined my page when I havent finished edit the George Prentice page page, u go end edit it.

Nomination of List of theatres in Louisville, Kentucky for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of theatres in Louisville, Kentucky is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of theatres in Louisville, Kentucky until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:39, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fraternities has been nominated for discussion

Category:Fraternities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 15:14, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Warsaw kentucky.jpg

The file File:Warsaw kentucky.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"*Trippolette" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect *Trippolette. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 3#*Trippolette until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 07:21, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Autosanguination" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Autosanguination. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 11#Autosanguination until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Tire tool" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Tire tool. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 14#Tire tool until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 86.23.109.101 (talk) 12:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox farm

Template:Infobox farm has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox park. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:32, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Long-overdue Louisville Barnstar for you!

		The Louisville Barnstar
		For all your excellent work on Louisville area-related articles and within WikiProject Louisville in the 2000s, you are the first recipient of The Louisville Barnstar. Long overdue! Also, please come back. :) Stefen Tower_{s among the rest!} ^{Gab • Gruntwerk} 20:34, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]