User:Maralia/Happystuff

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I'd like to thank you for coming to my defense, and explaining the situation in that vandalism/3RR mess on Linkin Park. :) Parsecboy 16:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

		The WikiChevrons
		In recognition of your hard work assessing warships for the project, I hereby award you the Military history WikiProject WikiChevrons. --ROGER DAVIES ^TALK 13:28, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

pull!

Thanks for your help in getting the good ship SS Christopher Columbus to Good Article status. She would have been sunk without everyone's help, it's really swell how we all pulled together.

anchors aweigh!

Happy birthday, man! This cake is, like, way bigger than the one you gave me... not that I'm bragging or anything. The only thing I'm better at than baking is modesty. Enjoy! TomTheHand 03:38, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

		The TomStar81 Spelling Award
		Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Maralia has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page USS Kentucky (BB-66), and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this TomStar81 Spelling Award and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 23:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Have another ASCII barnstar for your help in getting Edward Low to featured article status! * Neil ☎ 14:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Thank you so much; you are appreciated. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:04, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

For tagging and assessing 250 articles, I hereby present you with this Milhist Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

For tagging and assessing 500 articles, I hereby present you with this Milhist Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

For tagging and assessing 1000 articles, I hereby present you with this Milhist Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

For your fine work on 2000 articles in Tag & Assess 2007, I hereby present you with this barnstar. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:21, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

		WikiProject Ships Barnstar
		In recognition of your outstanding work in revising the main project page, for initiating the assessment drive, and for reinvigorating the project in general, I proudly present you with with the very first award of our new barnstar! Kralizec! (talk) 02:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For caring - I'm sure you know where, it helps the world keep going Herby ^{talk thyme} 19:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

		The Working Woman's Barnstar
		I joyously bestow this genderless barnstar to Maralia for giving invaluable assitance in the FA process for Birmingham campaign and Everglades National Park. Thank you very, very much. Moni3 (talk) 01:06, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

		The Reviewers Award
		I Woody, do hereby give Maralia this reviewers award for all the hard work and excellent reviews you give at the FAC process. They are much appreciated. Thankyou. Woody (talk) 11:26, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

		The WikiProject Films Award
		I, twelsht (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC), hereby award Maralia the WikiProject Films Award for his/her valued contibutions to WikiProject Films. Thank you for your detailed feedback on Jack Warner. Awarded 03:28, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Discovery Expedition has got its FA star. Thank you for your interest in the article & the careful review you gave it - much appreciated. Brianboulton (talk) 13:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Saw your review of the renomination of Tel-Aviv at FAC and was impressed with your control of the language and the issues. Although your interest is mainly in ships, we'd be delighted if you reviewed FACs whenever you find time! It's a powerful way of influencing the whole project WRT standards of prose. Tony (talk) 13:19, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes! Less pain would be good!

In response, thanks for all the nitpicking. You asked the questions that had to be asked, and instead of laying down ultimatums like some PR/FA responders do, you were more than happy to go out of your way to work to a mutually beneficial solution, and took the time to review the sources to make sure we were correct.

I owe you:

my undying gratitude
Assistance to drag an article of your choice and writing to FA standard, kicking and screaming if necessary

Again, thank you! -- saberwyn 09:05, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

		The TomStar81 Spelling Award
		Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Maralia has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page Montana class battleship, and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this TomStar81 Spelling Award and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 19:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Content Review Medal of Merit
		In recognition of your much appreciated reviews of military history articles, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 06:16, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Dear Co nom :).. please see [15] and [16] ... We did it! I will be more formally thanking all the major contributors but wanted to thank you first, never could have done it without you! I know you're an old hand at this but since this is my first one you'll have to forgive me for being a bit excited... ++Lar: t/c 01:48, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations and kudos for all of your outstanding work!! --Kralizec! (talk) 02:20, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

yaay!

Thanks for your help in getting the good ship SS Christopher Columbus to Featured Article status. The nomination went swimmingly, it was clear sailing all the way, no one turned up to torpedo it, and she passed easily.

that's the ticket!

	Nice job on "Miss Ima"!
	To all of the excellent editors who were part of the Karanacs-led collaboration to bring Ima Hogg to featured status, it was a pleasure working with you on such a fine article about a great lady. Thank you so much for your contribution to this fun collaboration. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:24, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

I wish this were a barnstar, but it serves the same purpose. One hundred and twenty one references! Thank you for going over all of the citations in To Kill a Mockingbird. I would not have been able to nominate it for feature without your help. This is the 2nd article you have jumped in to rescue. I wish I could take you out to dinner. --Moni3 (talk) 22:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Maralia has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page Montana-class battleship, and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this Copyeditor's Barnstar and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! TomStar81 (Talk) 07:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I, for your comments at the Tel Aviv FAC's Flymeoutofhere (talk) 11:54, 13 April 2008 (UTC), award you this Bagel of Zion for improving the coverage of ציון. Remember not to edit on empty stomach.

		The Paranormal Barnstar
		For finding no typos while reviewing the article USS Missouri (BB-63) I hereby present you with The Paranormal Barnstar. Hopefully, your discovery of no spelling errors in an article will not be a sign of the apocalypse :) TomStar81 (Talk) 07:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Nimrod Expedition

This is to thank you for your copyedits and other review comments. Your help during the assembly of this series of expedition histories has been much appreciated. This is the last of the "big four" British Antarctic efforts, though I shall continue to write about minor expeditions, and about individual explorers. I'm glad that you found the articles interesting. Brianboulton (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

...And, a little to my surprise, I find the Nimrod article promoted! (perhaps you have secret influence in these matters.) Anyway, your help in reviewing and supporting these expedition articles during the past few months is very much appreciated; you must know the stories well enough now to write your own versions. Nimrod's promotion completes my main project (all four major Brit Antarctic expeditions, and their leaders, to FA). In the next months I shall be working on the minor expeditions and the supporting casts, not particulary with FA ambitions in mind, but generally to extend and improve the quality of these articles. Warm thanks, once again - I feel I owe you some favours. Brianboulton (talk) 11:16, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

		The Order of the Superior Scribe of Wikipedia
		To Maralia, For your superior reviews of at least 15 Featured article candidates during May, thank you for being one of the top reviewers this month and for your careful work and thorough reviews to help promote Wiki's finest work. Not only have you helped maintain standards in featured articles, you've joined the ranks of those who selflessly help restore standards in your work at Wayne Gretzky. And a special thanks for running the May stats, a tiresome job :-)) Always, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC) Special thanks to Ling.Nut—a retired editor who had a strong commitment to excellence in content review—for designing this award.

		The Working Woman's Barnstar
		To Marlia, Thank you so much for your invaluable assitance in cleaning up old {{facfailed}} templates for {{articlehistory}}, and for helping process FAC closes during GimmeBot's vacation! The work is so much easier when shared, and it's gratifying that someone else knows how to keep up with these tedious and time-consuming chores! All the best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:45, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

		The Content Review Medal of Merit
		In recognition of your contribution in improving Military history articles through A-Class and Peer Reviews, during the period March-May 2008, please accept this Content Review Medal of Merit, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 02:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		For answering the call to copyedit the article Montana class battleship during the article's FAC I herby present you with The Copyeditor's Barnstar. Sorry for the long delay in getting this hard earned barnstar to you, I have been otherwise occupied with both on wiki work and real life work. TomStar81 (Talk) 08:16, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

This edit made me snort my Diet Pepsi. You owe me!!!! :) OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 01:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

It's all part of my devious plan to take out Diet Pepsi drinkers, one sinus infection at a time. After they're gone, all soda fountains will be forced to carry my beloved Diet Coke. Maralia (talk) 03:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

On 15 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article HMT Bedfordshire, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Congratulations on SS Christopher Columbus, your FA nom, making front page!! Your shipmates at WP:SHIPS are proud of you and your accomplishments!! --Kralizec! (talk) 01:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

		Military history service award
		By order of the coordinators, for your good work tagging and assessing military history articles in Tag & Assess 2008, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 09:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

		Military history service award
		By order of the coordinators, for your great work tagging and assessing military history articles in Tag & Assess 2008, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Service Award. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 09:55, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out here with copyediting. I've read and written so much in the article, I believe I'm seeing plaques form in my brain. Ack. And please, no edit summaries that make me snort my diet pepsi. That would be sad. And a waste of good Diet Pepsi. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 21:52, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Try giving birth; you won't be able to remember a damn thing for years. I'll be done with my comments for the FAC in a few minutes. Maralia (talk) 22:09, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Physiologically that would be impossible for me. However, I'm sure it's just a conspiracy to make us males feel bad. OrangeMarlin ^{Talk• Contributions} 22:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Beautiful work on Samuel Johnson; thanks, Maralia!! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

I know how to write, and how to cite, but a lot of the Wikipedia knowledge is material I don't know. Infoboxes? What a great idea! Of course I've seen them on Wikipedia pages, but never thought much about them, nor ever edited one. I think I may have over-cited the article a bit, but I read legal and academic journal articles which are full of cites, so am used to it. I feel badly when I see uncited material in WP, though, someone took the time to write something but we can't verify it... About the NRHP, it was mentioned several times so I feel confident it is true, and it had a backstory, so it seems to be true. I tried to find the Nobska on the NRHP, but indeed as you point out since it/she doesn't exist any more, the ship is not listed. (I am wondering if WP has a convention for feminizing the pronoun of ships....) I'll check out the Elkman.net site. Yeah I'm trying to not be overly possessive since that is not how WP works, but I am very curious to see if people look at the new page and what they do when they do. You cleaned it up, two people rated it and added it to projects, another commented on my talk page, another pointed out there are too many cites a few times on the Nobska talk page. Amazing range of responses!--Wmjames (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the MoS help. :) --mav (talk) 04:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

I greatly appreciate your critical eye on these FACs. Jack Kemp is better off for your hard work. I have replied to most comments you made except I have only completed serial commas through the football section in hopes that you will have commentary to cause me to review the rest of the aritcle.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Thank you ever so much for doing that list. I hope it wasn't tooo much brain damage. I am torn between awarding you a golden sword and a $250,000 annual pension or a different barnstar every day for you and each of your descendants unto three generations. chronic indecision is likely to prevent either becoming a reality.

While I'm here, there's a problem I've been wondering about. This is how to get appropriate Ships articles tagged for Milhist in a low-fuss no-special-drives way.

Anyhow, thanks again for working on the list. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 07:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Maralia, I'm not sure if I ever encountered you on here before but I've been around the featured article candidate block a few times. There was a time when I refused to nominate any articles for FAC because of the excruciatingly ego-busting ~~battle~~ experience that is FAC. This recent FAC for James Russell Lowell, however, has been one of the most positive experiences of my tenure here at Wikipedia. Your comments were extremely thorough, well-considered, and presented in the true spirit of this project: helpful collaboration. I have never been known to take criticism well, but I was unable to consider any of your comments critical. Instead they were sincerely helpful... isn't that what WP is all about? I considered offering you a barnstar. Instead, I offer these (public) words of thanks and of praise. You are, as I said, nothing less than awesome and a true credit to Wikipedia. I look forward to further e-interaction. --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

		The TomStar81 Spelling Award
		Be it known to all members of Wikipedia that Maralia has corrected my god-awful spelling on the page Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, and in doing so has made an important and very significant contribution to the Wikipedia community, thereby earning this TomStar81 Spelling Award and my deepest thanks. Keep up the good work! {{{2}}}

		The WikiChevrons
		For service above and beyond the call of duty as part of Operation Silent Sentry, the October 15, 2008, effort to keep the mainpage article USS New Jersey (BB-62) vandal free and address any talkpage related question, I herby present you with The WikiChevrons. Semper Fi! TomStar81 (Talk) 00:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

		*USS Nevada* (BB-36)**
		Thank you very, very much for your constructive criticism on the successful FAC that the USS Nevada (BB-36) recently went through. Looking back, it would not have passed without your comments and help. Thank you soooo much, Maralia. Cheers, —Ed 17 for President _{Vote for Ed} 14:44, 16 October 2008 (UTC) Nevada underway off of the U.S. Atlantic coast on 17 September 1944.

You're not older, you're better ! Please enjoy your day, and may your birthday wishes come true. Happy, happy birthday, all the best, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 20:00, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Awesomeness
		To the awesome and amazing Maralia, who reduced the old {{facfailed}} talk page templates from 700 to 0, helping build the archived FACs into {{articlehistory}} templates: in grateful appreciation for the hours of tedious work that will help us better maintain FAC records in the future. You're the best !! SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:41, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

		What a Brilliant Idea Barnstar
		For that brilliant idea you had which allows easier monitoring of Ships related articles to keep them safe from vandalism. Mjroots (talk) 06:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Milhist coordinator confirmation

The existing coordinators have unanimously decided to coopt you as a Coordinator of the Military history Wikiproject with immediate effect. As is customary, I present you with these stars and wish you luck in the coming months.

In addition to reading the summary of coordinator responsibilities, there are background essays, which may be of interest:

Finally, there's a coordinator usebox – {{WPMILHIST Coordinator}} – if you wish to use it.

Once again, all the very best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 20:20, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

On 10 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article German submarine U-558, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

I appreciate your help in parsing this minor quandry at Order of the Bath. In thanks, may I share two other paired images? As you may already know, Vincent Van Gogh copied two of the One Hundred Famous Views of Edo by Andō Hiroshige (安藤広重), which were among his collection of Japanese ukiyoe prints:

I think I've learned from working through this small problem with you. I'm pleased to include {{double image}} among the tools available in future. --Tenmei (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thank you for your copyediting efforts on Alaska-class cruiser; they are so appreciated over here. You've just got to hog the glory...show up during this FAC and help me respond to Sandy's comments, show up during the FAC for Nevada and literally save the day...;D Thank you so very much! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 07:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Sincere thanks for your extensive copyedit to SS Kroonland. Your efforts helped to overcome prose-related concerns at its FAC and have helped to almost make it a Featured Article. — Bellhalla (talk) 16:18, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

		The Teamwork Barnstar
		For your oustanding efforts during Operation Trailblazer, culminating in the 2009 Featured Topic nomination for the Iowa-class battleships, the passage of which resulted in the first ever Wikipedia Featured Topic concerning ships exclusively, I herby present you with The Teamwork Barnstar. Thanks for all of your help, this is as much your Featured Topic as it is mine. TomStar81 (Talk) 22:19, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

We did it, my friend! Thanks for your help throughout - it was invaluable! :) —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 18:59, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Charming note on my talk page - bless you! Where would we elves be without wise reviewers? Tim riley (talk) 16:39, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		For your leadership of The Military History WikiProject from September 2008–March 2009, please accept this WikiProject Barnstar. Cam ^(Chat) 00:46, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Noel Coward has been promoted to FA. Your excellent comments really helped us improve it - Thanks! All the best, -- Ssilvers (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Congrats on your election as a Coordinator of the Military history Wikiproject! In keeping with the tradition of the project and in honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:53, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		Thank you for your copyediting efforts during the FAC of Design 1047 battlecruiser, which passed in no small part to your efforts. Cheers! —Ed 17 ^{(Talk / Contribs)} 04:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

		Military history reviewers' award
		By order of the coordinators, for your good work helping with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award. Roger Davies ^talk 14:06, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		For fixing up the templates at Talk:Suicide. :) Whip it! ^{Now whip it good!} 04:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

		The Content Review Medal of Merit
		By order of the Military history WikiProject coordinators, for your devoted work on the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews April to June 2009, I am delighted to award you this Content Review Medal. Roger Davies ^talk 12:12, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Congrats on your election as Coordinator for the Military history Project. In honor of your achievement, I present you with these stars. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		In gratitude for your coordination services to the Military history WikiProject, from March 2009 to September 2009, please accept this barnstar. --TomStar81 (Talk) 02:22, 27 Sept

		The Copyeditor's Barnstar
		For unseen but not unappreciated work on the recently-elevated Jackie Robinson article (and for helping talk me down off the ledge of intransigence in the face of FAC opposition). BillTunell (talk) 19:42, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

		The Guidance Barnstar
		Thank you so much for your help with Amagi-class battlecruiser's FAC; it is greatly appreciated by me. :-) —Ed (talk•contribs) 23:45, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		This Barnstar of Diligence is for Maralia, who politely yet firmly opposes instruction creep during reviews at WP:FAC. Thank you for looking out for nominators and reviewers. Karanacs (talk) 18:58, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

	<font=3>While James, the God of Earth in this video game, is busy celebrating Sacrifice's promotion to featured article with multiple castings of Bovine Interventions—resulting in a crazed cow as it landed too many times on its noggin—I want to thank you for reading over the article and correcting its language. With your copyediting, it made FA! Jappalang (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Maralia has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
and therefore, I've officially declared today as Maralia's day!
For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian,
enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Maralia!

Peace,
Rlevse
02:12, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

		The WikiProject Barnstar
		In gratitude of your service as a coordinator for the Military history Project from September 2009 to March 2010, I hereby award you this WikiProject Barnstar. TomStar81 (Talk) 00:19, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

You've been cited

The Spurgeon Series 1855 & 1856: Unabridged Sermons In Modern Language cites a userspace page you started, http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Maralia/SS_Arctic ,rather than the article space article on theSS Arctic. I discovered this when I was reviewing the deletion of the article on the SS Vesta.

Incidentally, I requested a deletion review on the SS Vesta.

I saw the ships userbox on your user page. Perhaps you have an opinion on how much weight should be given to the essay WP:Notability (vehicles) in discussions over deleting articles on ships?

The essay argues we should only have articles on exceptional individual "vehicles", and that, usually, anything meaningful should go in the article on the vehicle's class.

I can see some sense behind applying the advice in this essay to cars, trucks, bicycles, carts, trains -- even airplanes. But it seems to me bo be both contrary to our usual practice with ship, and contrary to what makes sense.

Fighter aircraft and airliners can be as expensive as ships, or even more expensive. But they are also more standardized than ships, and they undertake different kinds of missions. Fighters almost always fly in squadrons with identical fighters. Airliners share routes with identical airliners. Whereas naval vessels, coast guard vessels, fishery and environmental patrol vessels, tramp freighters, and many other kinds of ships normally proceed alone, on open ended voyages, that may not be repeated.

Do you think it would make sense to change that essay so it explicitly excludes ships from its advice?

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 19:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Good grief! It's bad enough to cite Wikipedia in the first place, but citing a subpage in my userspace?! Astonishing.

I would not choose to argue the deletion of SS Vesta; if I recall correctly, it was a nondescript merchant ship routinely used to carry men and supplies to a far-flung fishing station. While it did gain a certain notoriety as a result of the Arctic incident, a redirect is surely sufficient.

As to the question of ship notability in general, I'm afraid I have been out of the loop, wiki-wise, for too long to have much to contribute to the conversation. For what it's worth, in 2007–2008 I revamped the WP:SHIPS project page and created Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships/sidebar, which was intended to list all relevant guidance. The notability essay you mention is not listed therein, nor do I recall ever being aware of its existence. That being said, however, I find the requirements listed in Wikipedia:Notability (vehicles)#"Individual vehicles" to be quite reasonable. (The scare quotes in that essay, though, are inexcusable.)

Thanks for letting me know about Vesta, and about the cite. I really must get off my duff and rewrite Arctic someday. It's a sensational story.

Maralia (talk) 05:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You

		Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Smithsonian 2012 Barnstar
		Thank you for participation inWikipedia Loves Libraries: Backstage at the Smithsonian Libraries 2012! It was a great day, thanks to enthusiastic participants like you. -Sarasays (talk) 13:33, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi, I wanted to thank you for your wonderful review of the Crucifixion and Last Judgement diptych. It's been a challenging article and your suggestions were necessary to bring the last few bits of structure into place. It's much better now, and I needed your comments to see what had to be done there. Truthkeeper (talk) 23:16, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Ditto, the review was very helpful and very much appreciated. I well remember (gets out pipe and slippers) the Garden of Earthly Delights nom, the feedback there was great, a good example of when wiki works best (for me, har!). Best. Ceoil (talk) 06:29, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Seasons greetings...

		Happy Holidays
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free.Ealdgyth - Talk 17:25, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

'Tis that season again...

	Happy Holidays!
	Hope you and your family are enjoying the holiday season, Maralia! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 06:10, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Best wishes for the New Year!

Wishing you and yours a joyous, healthful, and productive 2013!

Please accept a belated thank you for the well wishes upon my retirement as FAC delegate this year, and apologies for the false alarm of my first—and hopefully last—retirement; the well wishes extended me were most kind, but I decided to return, re-committed, when another blocked sock was revealed as one of the factors aggravating the FA pages this year.

Maintaining standards in featured content requires vigilance, dedication and knowledge of people like you, who are needed; reviews are always welcome at FAC, FAR and TFA requests. Somehow, somehow we never ever seem to do nothin' completely nice and easy, but here's hoping that 2013 will see a peaceful road ahead and a return to the quality and comaraderie that defines the FA process, with the help of many dedicated Wikipedians!

SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:39, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

A million thanks...

...for closing all those FAC candidates. I can't begin to imagine the tedium that it entailed. The community owes you a big favour, or at least a big hug. Graham. Graham Colm (talk) 21:47, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks; it's nice to be appreciated. The closing work itself wasn't too painful—just a few hours of boredom—but I found a few opportunities for process improvement along the way. (Only the first one is really important to FAC, but I'm listing all three here so I have a reference point for follow-up.)

First I documented the FAC/FAR closing process as best I could. I hope GimmeBot returns soon, but a bot owner has offered to write a backup/replacement so I'm trying to help cover our bases.
Next I tackled a frequent failure point in {{ArticleHistory}}: when the template attempts to lookup a GA topic name, it doesn't always get a result, causing an ArticleHistory error. This was complicated to research and rewrite because I had to make sure that none of the four other templates that use the same lookup table would be adversely affected by changes. I proposed a rewrite here.
Last of all, I found a few minor errors in the ArticleHistory code, and proposed a solution.

I probably already spent as much time on each one of these issues as it took me to do all the closings, but they had to be addressed eventually. Hoping to get them all resolved soon, to reduce the administrative demands of the closing process. Maralia (talk) 18:14, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

You're awesome. Maybe if those proposals don't get addressed at those talk pages we can escalate to WP:VPT? Biosthmors (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

What I am is exceedingly stubborn! Also tired of fixing ArticleHistory errors. And eminently distractible: let's not forget how I told you two sections above this that I was committed to finishing my open projects before attacking anything else...oops.

The audience for those template pages is quite small, so it may take a little time before my talk page notices garner attention. This is no big deal, as neither of those proposed changes is particularly urgent. If they fail to catch anyone's eye there after a while, I will approach a few folks who I know are already familiar with the specific templates—going to VPT would require asking some poor sod to learn the ArticleHistory code, and I'd rather not have that on my conscience :) Maralia (talk) 21:39, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Precious

ships and medicine
Thank you for quality articles, after thorough research, on ships such as SS Christopher Columbus, for cleaning up medicine, for collecting happystuff, for helping {{article history}}, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (7 March 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Minor Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts to create "article history" sections for so many GAs--it's a big job, and I appreciate your taking it on. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:18, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! GimmeBot used to perform this task, but has been AWOL for a couple of months, so I'm trying to make a dent in the backlog while writing up a plan for a replacement. It's probably foolish to bother doing any manually, but it feels irresponsible to just let them all go for months. Thanks for noticing; it's nice to be appreciated. Maralia (talk) 17:41, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

A thanks from me too. I didn't realise you were doing this manually until I popped over to Gimmis page to see what was happening to Gimmebot. If it is possible could you add the review process into this bots function. I left a request at User talk:Gimmetrow#Update the article history following Good article reassessments a few months ago. It is not a major as GARs are much less common than GANs, but it might be easier to code it all at once. We can adapt the closing instructions to the bot so don't worry about adhering to them too closely. If it is too tricky don't worry about it, we have survived for years now doing it manually. Thanks again. AIRcorn (talk) 18:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure, I will work that in to my request. I've been away on vacation for a week, so I have some catching up to do: finalizing the lookups for GA topics, catching up on articlehistory for closed GAs, and then the massive bot request. Maralia (talk) 02:30, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Lotte Brand Philip

On 24 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lotte Brand Philip, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Albrecht Dürer's paintings of his parents were reunited in 2012 after art historian Lotte Brand Philip identified the portrait of his mother, thought lost since the 17th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lotte Brand Philip. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you! She is now featured on Portal:Germany. If you have other DYK related to Germany, feel free to place it there yourself, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Congrats Maralia for finally having this approved! I've been sitting on my hands watching, wanting to chime in since the answers were sitting on my page (moved here now, but didn't want to muddy the waters more. Good luck to you guys with the diptych. Victoria (talk) 20:40, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Victoria; without the kick in the pants from you and Ceoil, it wouldn't have happened. Maralia (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Congrats from me two. Its a really strong article, great work. Ceoil (talk) 21:58, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank for your patient explanations

	The Teacher's Barnstar
	Many thanks to you, Maralia, and you too, SandyGeorgia, for showing me the ropes on updating article history. You've just taught a man to fish, and now I have no excuse if I don't eat for a lifetime. Thanks for your patience. – Quadell ^(talk) 23:18, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

It is nice of you to give me a barnstar on Maralia's page ... I am thinking of asking TonyTheTiger if he would be a dear and place a copy on my talk page, since I feel an extreme COI were I to do it myself, and my self-esteem will suffer if I don't have this :) :) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:47, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays...

		Happy Holidays
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. Ealdgyth - Talk 23:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Holiday greetings

Happy Holidays!

Victoria

Best wishes

	Belated happy christmas and a tolerable new year
	Wishing you all the best for 2014, not only in appreciation for the Dürer collaboration but in recognition of the thankless.endless.fucking.herculean.task.you have taken on. And for your mostly good humoured toleration of the ire of those that dont realise the mundane everyday work that goes on around here to keep FA ticking over. God or the devil give you strength. Ceoil (talk) 23:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Hear hear! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:37, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Bringing you warm wishes for the New Year!

May you and yours enjoy a healthful, happy and productive 2014!

And thank you for all you do in here!

Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:59, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Precious again

ships and medicine
Thank you for quality articles, after thorough research, on ships such as SS Christopher Columbus, for cleaning up medicine, for collecting happystuff, for helping {{article history}}, - repeating: you are an awesome Wikipedian (7 March 2010)!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:26, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

A year ago, you were the 405th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:00, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Happy to have you back! Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 00:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Hey, thanks. You are good people! Maralia (talk) 01:31, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Nollaig

	Nollaig shona duit
	Best christmas and new year. Another year down, and so much more to write. Thanks for all your contribuitions and being part of the community. Hope January is at least resonabally tolerable for you. Great to see you back. Ceoil (talk) 09:35, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Ah, now THAT's a recognizable hand. I have missed that wayward spelling of yours! My very best wishes to you and the missus! Maralia (talk) 06:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks...I think :) Ceoil (talk) 21:44, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Happy Holidays!

Victoria (tk)

Thank you Victoria! Have just peeked at your Christus and it's lovely. Merry Christmas! Maralia (talk) 06:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

		Happy Holidays
		Wishing you and yours a Happy Holiday Season, from the horse and bishop person. May the year ahead be productive and troll-free. - Ealdgyth - Talk 15:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Well hello stranger; how have I not run into you these last few weeks? Have a fantastic holiday! Maralia (talk) 06:14, 26 December 2014 (UTC)