Jump to content

User:Leutha/Archive 3 (August 2011)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Soviet

[edit]

I've reverted your change in redirect at Soviet; see Talk:Soviet. Also, have you considered further archiving your talk page? It's getting rather long. –Schmloof (talk · contribs) 09:37, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Briggs Enigma and Nevis Historical and Conservation Society

[edit]

Hello Harrypotter, I just now noticed your note about this on the talk page of the article on the NHCS. I can try to see if anyone at NHCS has access to info about Sir Charles Briggs, maybe in their archives. I did want to say that there is a first-person historical account about Briggs in Barbados that is accessible via Googlebooks from a book called "English in the West Indies: or the bow of Ulysses" by James Anthony Froude. See [1] here. Hope this is useful. Invertzoo (talk) 22:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

My problem

[edit]

My problem is that these People's Commissars are exacly the same as Ministries. There are no differences, I've seen anywhere else where you create a seperate article for the same bloody thing. It haven't seen this happen in any other article, or topic, why in gods name should the Soviet government be treated any different? It shouldn't... Second argument, none of these articles seems to be growing, no one is working on them, and if its true as some say that there is enough information out there to evolve these articles from stub and start-classes into GA's, FA's or an article that is not easily mergeable, then yes these articles should have seperate articles. But there has been no work on these articles, no work on trying to expand them, and therefor its hard to establish a reason for why two articles about the same thing should not be one article. If you can prove to me by actually finding enough sources for both articles which can get both articles in decent shape, it would have been okay. But instead you seem to want seperate articles because they had different names, even if they worked exacly the same way and did the exacly the samething. Do you now understand my problem? --TIAYN (talk) 12:41, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

When did I say you couldn't use sources other than English? I use Russian sources all-the-time! And yes, there were some key differences from the people's commissars from other ministries, but those costums did not disappear when they renamed the whole-system. Question did these differences disappear with the ministries, or did the system continue? You are saying the commissariat's were special, but you seem to be skeeping over the point that the only differences between the ministries and the commissariats by the end of the day were none-existing.. And yes, I know, there was a different government for the RSFSR, but thats not what we are talking about, right?
Oh yeah, you are vandalising the pages as much as I am; don't be arrogant! --TIAYN (talk) 21:04, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Just to rub in your face, "they were infact ministers". --TIAYN (talk) 21:21, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Because you seem to be keen on insulting me. All I know is this, when sources confirm, and say that the commissars were in effect no difference from ministries, i beg to differ. Second, yes its true that the Bolsheviks thought the commissars were far-less burgouis, and yes, maybe there were differences from the early commissars and the ministry, but the fact is Joseph Stalin centralized all state-authority. If there was any differences, there may have been some in the pre-Stalin era. But seeing that the pre-Stalin consists, of lets say six years, before he took full control, its not much compared to the other twenty. --TIAYN (talk) 21:28, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
There are several other books which states that commissars is just the same minister, hence no real difference from commissars to ministry. Second my sources suggest that Stalin re-named the system, but didn't change the system, meaning there is no difference at all. They are the same organizations, just under different names. Seconds, no I didn't mean you insulted me by you disagreeing with me, that part i respect. Lines like this one, "[...] perhaps the article might possibly grow instead of people having to deal with your distractions" or "So no I do not understand your problem, which appears little different from a subtle form of vandalism", are seen as an insult by me. --TIAYN (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
If its so important for you to create the political commissars/ministry articles for the RSFSR do it. The commissars created in 1917 continued after the establishment of the USSR. This is proven by the fact that many of the commissars of the RSFSR before the founding of the USSR, kept their old jobs. --TIAYN (talk) 21:40, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello, Leutha. You have new messages at Talk:People's Commissariat for Post and Telegraph.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Plan

[edit]

Plan, instead of naming the articles Ministry of People's Commissar of/for, instead we title People's Commissar and Ministry of Foreign Affairs... What do you think? --TIAYN (talk) 20:11, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

m: Talk:Meetup/London/38

[edit]

Hello! --KYPark (talk) 09:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Hi. See also this as a result from your information. --KYPark (talk) 06:33, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:59, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

People's Commissariat for Post and Telegraph

[edit]

nice work Decora (talk) 22:03, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

First All-Union Census of the Soviet Union

[edit]

nice job Decora (talk) 02:39, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

would love your collaboration

[edit]

http://www.afropedea.com
http://www.afropedea.org —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.186.48.62 (talk) 03:02, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

warning

[edit]

I've told administrators about your recent unconstructive behaviour, it is sad that you don't bother to read sources. I mean, seriously, even Soviet sources say it was reorganised or renamed, but as all sources notes, these reorganisation wasn't that radical and the basic system remaned the same. I will revert all your vandalist edits on wikipedia, but seeing that you used your time vandalising instead of having a consructive discussion on the topic, that's why i'm calling the administrators at you. --TIAYN (talk) 07:26, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

[edit]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 09:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

As far as the two Commissariat/Ministry articles in discussion are concerned, they have one article on Wikipedia (Ministry of...), and the title Commissariat of... redirects to the Ministry article. If you have information you wish to add, you should add it to the Ministry of... article, and not try to create a Commissariat of... article. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 14:16, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Commissariats vs. Ministries

[edit]

I support your intention to keep these articles separate and suggest you asking for a help on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia page. Let me know when you set up a request there. --Michael Romanov (talk) 15:38, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

If he persists in copying the text of one article into another to create the second article, without proper accreditation, he will be blocked from editing. If he had different content for the two articles that showed that they were different entities - then there would not have been a problem. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 15:44, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I mean the latter. BTW, Harrypotter just tries to revert the edits of another user, as far as I understand. Look: there was an article People's Commissariat of Finance. Another user, Trust Is All You Need, decided that this article should be a kind of a merger between two separate entities, People's Commissariat of Finance and Ministry of Finance (Soviet Union). He deleted the article content and made a redirect to Ministry of Finance (Soviet Union). He also added some deleted information to that article. So, the actual problem, how I see it, is that Trust Is All You Need makes mergers/redirects and deletes/moves the article content. And Harrypotter just tried to fix the problem. If this issue is serious enough, it should be discussed with more editors on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Russia, Wikipedia:Requests for comment/History and geography, WP:VPM or WP:AIN pages. --Michael Romanov (talk) 17:12, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
I think it's basically a content dispute, so involving the relevant project and discussing on talkpages is the way to go. I have no notion of which might be the right option (don't know enough about russian history). --Elen of the Roads (talk) 17:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
Well, a similar tactics is being used by Trust Is All You Need not only in the case of Russian history articles, see this complaint. --Michael Romanov (talk) 03:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, but I'm reverting those edits... They were wrong by, I though, but I was wrong, I was hasty and didn't read the sources. Therefor my edits were unconstructive. Sources however say they are the same organization.... Seeing that this was bloody hard for the first place, I created People's Commissariat for Finance of the RSFSR, your one narkofin article.. Isn't that what you always wanted? I am however reverting my edits on the Norwegian articles, because they were wrong! --TIAYN (talk) 04:09, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

ANI

[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Stickee (talk) 22:18, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Leutha. You have new messages at Elen of the Roads's talk page.
Message added 00:39, 15 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Glad to meet you

[edit]

Hi Harrypotter (cool name, why don't you ask Ginny & Hermione to come next time? Ron will certainly follow them) Nice seeing you at yesterday's London meetup. See you next time when we can do some more sharing. Cheers!--Computor (talk) 08:47, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Don't be shocked again ...

[edit]

Hi. Don't be shocked again: I just changed the BUND page and also I moved the complete Savin issue. It is not deleted but moved to the BUNDjugend page where it belongs to. Just wanted to inform you cause you complained about removing the Savin reference before. (And you were quite right then.) --Typograppa (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Finished

[edit]

I thought we were finished! But instead you start lying claiming there was no "Ministry of Finance of the RSFSR" and creating redirects.... What the hell is wrong with you???? --TIAYN (talk) 07:01, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:50, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedian in Residence listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedian in Residence. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedian in Residence redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Bridgeplayer (talk) 03:02, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Either stop vandalising or we won't have an article at all!

[edit]

Either you stop vandalising wiki, denying that a Ministry never existed, or we merge the entire MinofFin of the RSFSR article to Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation...... I must admit, I wonder why I even bother to post on this wall when I know you don't really give a shit about discussing, don't give a shit about references and don't give a shit about actually discussing and trying to come to a consensues... but hey, if you want act like that, i'm fine, but you won't come anywhere and all your edits will be reverted! --TIAYN (talk) 20:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Vasnier

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Henry Vasnier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾ talk 06:46, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

GLAM-WIKI

[edit]

Nice meeting you at GLAM-WIKI! Here is a small, low quality video of us. Seems to be all there is at present! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 17:24, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:07, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

UK Community Notice - IRC meeting

[edit]

Dear Wikipedian,


This is the first of what will hopefully be a regular notice to help bring together the UK community so that you can be involved in some amazing things. To kick things off, there will be a UK community IRC meeting at 1800 UTC, December 7, 2010 to discuss the future growth and developement of Wikimedia UK. Without huge community support and involvement, the chapter cannot be successful and to get the most out of it, get involved.

For information on the community IRC meeting please go here


More to come about:

  • Wikipedia 10th Anniversary Events
  • 1st Annual UK Wiki-conference
  • Trustee interest meeting - an event for those community members with even just a fleeting interest in becoming trustees of Wikimedia UK.


Many Thanks

Joseph Seddon
User:Seddon

Delivered by WMUKBot (talk) on 05:34, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:17, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

UK IRC community meeting

[edit]

Just a quick reminder about the IRC meeting at 1800 UTC tonight to bring together the Wikimedia community in the UK to help the growth and success of the UK chapter and community activities. For information see wmuk:Community_IRC_meetings

Many Thanks
Joseph Seddon
User:Seddon

Delivered by WMUKBot (talk) on 17:27, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Robert Chambers

[edit]

Hi, I see that you have changed Robert Chambers into a redirect to the disambiguation page and moved the content about the naturalist and publisher to Robert Chambers (journalist). Could you help fix the incoming links to Robert Chambers please? As far as I can see they all refer to Robert Chambers (journalist). You may find Dab solver useful. Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 13:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

Tis the season

[edit]

ϢereSpielChequers is wishing you Seasons Greetings! Whether you celebrate your hemisphere's Solstice or Xmas, Eid, Diwali, Hogmanay, Hanukkah, Lenaia, Festivus or even the Saturnalia, this is a special time of year for almost everyone!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:WereSpielChequers/Dec10/Balloon}} to your friends' talk pages.

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:59, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

On your question of Nov 15th about the James Monroe Trotter article, "55th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry or 54th Massachusetts Volunteer Infantry?", all documentation that I have encountered makes specific reference to the Massachusetts 55th regiment rather than the more famous 54th. Apparently, Trotter was counted among about 222 volunteers from the state of Ohio, joining one of the ten companies that mustered in during May and June of 1863. Thank you for the question and please forgive the delay in respondingTonymartin (talk) 20:50, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:38, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

(Video) game development

[edit]

Hi! Just want to let you know there was a discussion not too long ago about Talk:Video_game_development#Requested_moves. I am not really pro or con this now, just letting you know. Regards. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 11:24, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

More to the point, the result of that discussion was no consensus to move the article...so why did you move it contrary to the results of that discussion? Then you went and recreated the original article title as a DAB - thereby requiring the actions of an admin to revert your ill-considered change. Your actions are strongly contrary to the way we do things around here. SteveBaker (talk) 16:21, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:09, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

WP tag errors

[edit]

Hi- Just to let you know that |category=no only goes on a page when it's for a demo only. Your edit makes it go into Category:WikiProject banners with formatting errors. --Funandtrvl (talk) 00:11, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

GLAM contenders

[edit]

Hi HP, I got your message on my Meta talkpage - what "contenders" do you mean? Witty Lama 04:22, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

IC event

[edit]

Hi Harrypotter, I think that Feb 9th 2pm-4pm is going to be the event time, thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinnypatel (talk • contribs) 17:47, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:54, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Boje

[edit]

The article David Boje has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail both WP:AUTHOR and WP:ACADEMIC. Lots of books by this person, but I found no significant independent reliable source coverage about him.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:59, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Anti-Dboje

[edit]

Something else we disagree on: antenarrative. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:16, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Michael Ramsden

[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Michael Ramsden. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:46, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

BL email

[edit]

Hi, I've just sent off an email to BL Philately for a follow-up chat, could you email me Special:EmailUser/Fæ so I can copy you in? Cheers Fæ (talk) 11:37, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token e6555b6e7ff4bb022e5a36dfdf2df422

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 54baae3c5269208b1eb88746e5ed7d83

[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

WikiProject Essex

[edit]

Hello,
We noticed that you are from Essex. We are taking this opportunity to invite you to join WikiProject Essex. WikiProject Essex is a collaboration of users who are interested in improving the quality of all of the articles on Wikipedia about Essex. If you are interested, please feel free to add you name to our list of contributors.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Essex at 19:18, 6 February 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:22, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Nicholson (game designer)

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Scott Nicholson (game designer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dengero (talk) 12:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Outreach link - as discussed today

[edit]

http://outreach.wikimedia.org/wiki/GLAM/Wikimedians --Fæ (talk) 23:09, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

IC events!

[edit]

Dear Wikipedians!

Thank you for your interest today regarding the events at Imperial College next week.

To confirm, the events will be taking place in South Kensington

Imperial College London Exhibition Road London SW7 2AZ

Check out the interactive and street maps http://www3.imperial.ac.uk/campusinfo/southkensington

Wednesday's event will be happening outside Sherfield building and in Junior common room 1230-~330pm it is the sign up day, handing out leaflets; Thursday is the day where you can engage IC students at the meet and greet from about 530-630pm, in Sir Alexander Fleming building room G60 (ring me when you get there).

Here is the contrib team page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CONTRIB/Imperial2

I (would) attach a copy of the basic events plan. could you e-mail me me using the e-mail function under toolbox at user:vinnypatel so I can do this? PLEASE BRING YOUR LAPTOP IF YOU CAN(please)! Fabian I'd really like to get you on board to do a brief game thing and make the day more interesting

Regarding Thursday's event, I will confirm by e-mail with you that there is sufficient interest form students to make it worth your while to come along, but I think this will be the case. If you could put your name down as a preliminary first that would be great.

I would like to underline that while we may not have a collosus of students, your interaction will I think get things going with our society, and alumni and external Wikipedians giving us a taste of their experience and understanding of Wikipedia will provide things students will want to come back to.

Thanks!

Vinesh I'll send you my number by e-mail — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinnypatel (talk • contribs) 00:09, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:25, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

MOL interest

[edit]

You may want to take a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glynn Thomas. If his work is on permanent exhibit in the Museum you may be aware of it and have an opinion. Cheers Fæ (talk) 06:24, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:45, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Thursday 17th Feb

[edit]

Hi Fabian, Vinesh here from Wikipedians at IC - I was wondering if you could e-mail me the photo you took on Thursday 17th Feb at our Meet and Greet event? I believe you have my e-mail, and we could really use it as a way of showing to the Union that there was a good turnout etc. If you could include in your e-mail a bit of text as to the University of East London society coming up and how that could you would like to collaborate with us, that would be great! Thanks a lot.Vinnypatel (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

[edit]

Nomination of Men of Essex for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Men of Essex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men of Essex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 23:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:50, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:57, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:59, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Forbidden Kingdom

[edit]

Nice to hear that my game has attracted some interest. We played it two or three times at Mercyhurst College in connection with my master's program class. It took about an hour and half, maybe a bit less. It has some of the character of Diplomacy due to the required personal interaction between rounds. The first playing of the game resulted in discovery of a flaw in the game that allowed one player to manipulate the result. The posted rules include a fix to the game. The multiple plays of the game were required to sort that issue out. I found it fascinating that students kept losing the game. Since I modeled the game on the complexities of Chinese government, I suspect that American students have a hard time tolerating the give and take of Party politics. I'll be interested to hear how you fare. I hope you'll let me know.Pnoble805 (talk) 02:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

[edit]
Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:13, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

[edit]

Neuropa

[edit]

Hello. I have nominated this article, which you created, for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neuropa. Robofish (talk) 23:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

[edit]

We're recruiting art lovers!

[edit]
Archives of American Art Wikimedia Partnership - We need you!
Hi! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the Smithsonian Archives of American Art and I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about art to participate in furthering art coverage on Wikipedia. I am planning contests and projects that will allow you access, no matter where you live, to the world's largest collection of archives related to American art. Please sign up to participate here, and I look forward to working with you! SarahStierch (talk) 00:14, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011

[edit]

Edinburgh Wikimedia Meetup Number 2

[edit]
Is the person responsible for the Edinburgh Wikimedia Meet up?

Unable to make it, but many thanks for the heads up.

I am thoroughly supportive of any and all attempts to get more scholarly Scottish content onto Wikipedia, eg. from the country's extensive archives. I am not remotely supportive of any "Yookay"-based organisations interfering in Scottish affairs, so anything under a "Wikimedia UK" (sic) banner will be getting precisely zilch support from me, and I suspect a great many other Scotland-interested Wikipedia editors. On the other hand, a Wikimedia Scotland chapter would get my full backing. --Mais oui! (talk) 02:16, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

It would be excellent to see a Wikimedia Scotland emerge, but until then I am afraid we all have to live the consequences of James VI decision to come down to London and take up the empty throne that was available here.Leutha (talk) 16:03, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Every single one of the archive and museum/gallery organisations which the meeting agenda concerns is entirely free of London interference/control. Just a shame the same cannot be said about Wikipedia administration and content. --Mais oui! (talk) 16:08, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
Mon Cher Fred, please put this in a Scottish National Archive and don't let anyone from London interfere with it
Well I must admit on my single visit to the National Archives of Scotland located in Edinburgh and enquired about anything in their holdings relating to Black British History, the archivist who handled my enquiry said that he was very sorry, but there was nothing! However, having come all the way from London,I was not to be put off so easily, and soon I was looking through the correspondence between Toussaint Louverture and General Frederick Maitland. At the time I just thought this was part of the institutional racism which unfortunately still persists in the archive world. However, I am a bit shocked at your suggestion that I might of been discriminated against because I come from London. As regards Wikipedia as a whole, I think you should look into the matter a little more deeply, and you will probably end up agreeing with me that most of the control is exercised from the other side of the Atlantic Ocean whereas interference comes from people from across the whole globe! I have to say that one of the refreshing things about the Wikipedia London Meet ups is that we always have people turning up from all over the world. In fact, even I feel quite comfortable, even though I have Scottish ancestors. I would like to invite you to pop down and "interfere" with our meet up: I am sure you'll find we can all jolly along. I have copied this exchange onto my talk page, as I feel Johnbod may already have tired of this exchange.Leutha (talk) 18:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

re: John Boswell (freemason)

[edit]

Please take a look at the comments I have made on the talk page of the above article. I am thinking that we might need change the article title. Thanks. Blueboar (talk) 13:50, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011

[edit]

BL Event today.

[edit]

Sorry, cannot be there... Gordo (talk) 11:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 4 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 11 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 18 July 2011

[edit]

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Leutha/Archive_3_(August_2011)&oldid=1142120612"