User:Lectonar/Archive 8
1.fm
[edit]Hello Lectonar, and thank you for taking the time to help all of us new people that have questions concerning wikipedia! As you know ;-).... I have been trying to create a page for 1.fm for the past couple of weeks, however I just can't seem to get things on target!
I have been part of the Energy Group Radio LLC administration staff for the past 2 years, and 1.fm has made a VERY impressive mark on the Internet Radio industry. 1.fm and Energy Group Radio LLC are entirely owned by Energy Group Networks LLC(EGI Hosting). EGI Hosting not only host its own radio network, it host THOUSANDS of other Internet radio stations around the world! All of the 1.fm stations are being broadcasted on the i-Tunes radio tuner, and Windows Media Guide radio tuner that is located on mostly every system that is running Microsoft Windows operating system. 1.fm has added 3 new channels in the last month bringing its total station count to 29. With more than 30,000 concurrent listeners everyday, 1.5+ Million unique listeners a month and over 10 million tune-ins a month, I feel that 1.fm is VERY worthy of a wikipedia page. Only thing is I'm not anywhere near an english major! I want to provide enough credible information for one to expand our wiki page!
Also, last week I added 1.fm to the list of Web-Only stations that broadcast on the Internet and 1.fm was removed :-(
Lectonar, I am coming to you for your help in creating a Wikipedia page, as getting on to Wikipedia means alot to Energy Group Radio & Energy Group Networks LLC.
I am looking forward to your response and to us working together to build on both sides of the fence. :-)
Thank You,
--Thmhar3 20:03, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
Thomas Harris
Director of Urban Programming
Energy Group Radio LLC
answered on users talk-page
Homeaway
[edit]Hi, thanks for your message. I was contacted with an unsigned comment early yesterday morning by User:Denise78735 which said
Hi Rambling Man- I looked at the page you sent me to and looked at some other travel websites to follow their formats. I hope I got it right this time. I will post HomeAway again -- pls take a look and let me know if it's OK. Thanks
but I didn't get a chance to look at it. That's about the size of it! The Rambling Man 16:18, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 28 | 9 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
LaRue (band)
[edit]Hello! I wanted to create a page about LaRue but I saw it was already created and deleted (by you). What was the reason? I didn't find a debate page about it, where is it? or was it speedy deleted? Thanks -Sucrine ( ><> talk) 09:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Hi Lectonar,
What 2 films do you mean with "this is something based on 2 upcoming films"
Thanks, --Foerdi 10:20, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I left a somewhat cryptic delete message ;); the pertaining films would be Transformers (film), and Cloverfield). Shortly, I regarded it as hoax/OR. Lectonar 13:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
Wikicalendar guideline
[edit]I hope that you will consider contributing to the discussion about making Wikipedia:Notability on a global scale over time a guideline for Wikicalendar articles. Discussion is on the talk page. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 18:46, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've commented there. Lectonar
Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 29 | 16 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:27, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
You commented about this article, which was in the list of articles requiring translation. Taking into account your useful comments, and those of another editor, I have made a merger proposal on the above article talk page. Just to let you know. Itsmejudith 09:40, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ive commented there.
Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 30 | 23 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:27, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
Guy, you deleted the entry for Anna Quindlen. Or hadn't you noticed? --Calton | Talk 14:10, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hit me with a stick, but I didn't :( Lectonar 14:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
You deleted my Channone entry
[edit]Hello,
I do not understand why you deleted my Channone entry, I've read the inclusion policy and Channone won an AVN award and featured in both Top Adult Magazines and worked for Top Adult film companies. She has had a distinguished career in Adult Entertainment and won dance competitions also. Please can you explain the problem. Channone is one of the top Adult Stars of the 90's in both France and the USA. I spent many hours completing that article.
Please reply.
Kind Regards Damiwi.
- answered on uers talk-page
AN/I discussion
[edit]To let you know, your deletion of Olutosin Oduwole has been brought up at ANI (not by me, I just saw no one had bothered to tell you). Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:14, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- seems to have resolved; thanks for the message
Rhino.TV
[edit]Hello Lectonar,
I'd just like to say I appreciate the job you guys do in helping people on Wiki. However I am slightly confused as to why you will not approve of my Wikipedia entry for Rhino.tv. Please explain your decision for deleting the page - this is simply a page talking about Warner Music's Official Online Video Archive, I do not understand how it fails to comply with the wikipedia posting regulations.
Many Thanks,
Joe.
- answered on users talk-page
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.
[edit]Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 31 | 30 July 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi!
I noticed that you translate (actually, I randomly checked user contributions from members on the translator list and you were the first one active in the past year) and was wondering if you can take a look at this.
Basically, much of the info is from the German WP, and the combination computer and human-with-little-German-knowledge translation is probably awful.
By the way, you sure do dabble in many languages!
Thanks, Yodaat 03:49, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
- did some proofreading
Thanks so much! Also, I checked other translations, and didn't see the original page referenced. This is not to say that it shouldn't be done; how is it done in Wiki manner? (see User talk:Asthma bronchiale)
Yodaat 21:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Oh, another also: Why is tamaya capitalised?
Vozzztrazze
[edit]Lectonar, dunno if you've looked at the latest comments on Talk:Vossstrasse (sic), but User:Pmanderson has repeated his charge that all those who disgree with him are "nationalists" (which, in the case of articles about Germany, presumably means "Nazi"). This comes after he opened a WP:ANI that referred to me, but without telling me he had done so. (By the time I found out about this it had been archived, so I had no chance to respond.) I suspect he deserves a block for WP:AGF and WP:NPA (it wouldn't be his first), not to mention WP:DICK, but I'm technically involved (despite not being alerted to the WP:ANI about me). Regards, ProhibitOnions (T) 11:20, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- commented there and answered on users talk-page
Walt's Jewelers
[edit]Hi =) I noticed that you recently deleted this page as a result of me nominating it for speedy deletion. The author has recreated the article and I have nominated it for deletion again. I have also notified the editor that he needs to state the business' notability and I also mentioned your concern about conflict of interest. If there's anthing you want to add, he might appreciate your input. Thanks, SMC89 ( talk • contribs ) 13:57, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
- commented there
Signpost updated for August 6th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 32 | 6 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 09:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Sakartvelos Skauturi Modzraobis Organizatsia
[edit]Hi! Yes, it is possible that the Scout Oath differs significantly, each country writes their own-there is a basic framework, then each country adds what is meaningful to them. Thanks for asking! Chris 21:14, 7 August 2007 (UTC)
Your removal of protection
[edit]Please explain why you removed protection from the Habbo Hotel article. I don't believe that "time" is a valid reason for removal of protection. Just because the amount of vandals and trolls has slowed since the protection was issued, doesn't mean that it justifies for protection to be removed. –sebi 07:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- WP:PROT#Unprotection says: "any admin may unprotect any page after a reasonable period has elapsed", but then it goes on to say "particularly if there is no discussion on the talk page". There has been a lot of discussion going on on the talk page recently. –sebi 07:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered via e-mail
Geelong Karting Club
[edit]Hello, I am goinig to re create the Geelong Karting Club article. But this time I will add more refrences and info so it makes more sense.
Thank You
Muitint78 10:27, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- okay.....
Nilesh Roy
[edit]Thanks for deleting those pages. Looks like this is the second time the guy's tried to do this, should he get some sort of penalty? Also, looking at his contributions, it looks like he's creating several other user pages: for Sontu (apparently a pet name for himself) and Nilesh Roy, besides the one for himself. Does this count as sockpuppeting? GlassCobra 10:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Hakan Ozkok
[edit]Hi, may I ask why did you deleted Hakan Ozkok article? This gentelman is a candidate for general elections. Its really important to have some information about him. Best regards, Taylor
- answered on users talk-page
regarding Article for Deepali
[edit]Dear Lectonar why article about Deepali kishore was deleted while we were trying to justify about the article? some of our points are
- she was the most outstnding performer of Indian idol series
- she has huge fan following
- this profile type is like other profile, like prashant tamang who is also contesant for Indian idol 3.
regards
- answered on users talk-page
What are you talking? Who's spamming here? You have shown high-handedness in deleting the article, when all you should have done was to add the relevant tags and wait for the appropriate response. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 11:50, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Deleted Article: Ultra Naniwatic MC's
[edit]I notice that you deleted my article about the Ultra Naniwatic MC's earlier today. I understand that in the article I did not assert their notability. My belief that they are notable is based simply on the fact that both HMV and Tower Records in Kobe had the album in their recommended sections when I visited last December. I do not know much about the group and all the information on the web is in Japanese which I don't understand, therefore I tagged it as a stub article in the hope that someone else may be able to contribute more to the article. AstroMark 12:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
- Thanks for your comment AstroMark 16:23, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
You deleted Anna Friz, citing G12 (blatant copyright infringement). The page you refer to was used as a source/reference, but as far as I can tell, the text on the page was in no way the same as the text at the reference. The WP article wasn't using a standard <references/> tag; did you jump the gun on this one, or am I missing something? ◉ ghoti 17:21, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- I'm somewhat confused about your message concerning my deletion; the link provided to prove the copyright violation was http://www.kunstradio.at/ (and the article was a verbatiom copy off the link provided), not the one you used on my talk-page. Regards. Lectonar 14:47, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, so we're both confused. http://www.kunstradio.at/BIOS/frizbio.html is the source bio. You're saying the text you deleted was THAT text, not the stuff that answers.com grabbed from Wikipedia? This is a page I put online a *long* time ago -- I don't remember when, and the page's history has been deleted too. But the text from answers.com does look like something I might have written. Any idea where this disconnect is? Shall I just re-create the page using the text that answers.com came from WP in the first place? ◉ ghoti 15:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- commented
Signpost updated for August 13th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 33 | 13 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 20:39, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Espicom
[edit]Hi Lectonar,
I would like to query the decision to delete the Espicom page on the grounds of 'spamming'. The page was posted in good faith to provide information free from copyright restrictions in the area of business intelligence, similar to the pages for Datamonitor, Economist Intelligence Unit, IMS Health and Informa. I realise that the content may not be as extensive as these other pages but does represent the start of a more comprehensive entry.
Please contact me via my talk page to resolve this issue.
Chris Espicom 11:33, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Seth Sieunarine
[edit]Hi Lectonar Seth Sieunarine is a famour actor/model in both Canada and Trinidad and Tobago. Though is works are not advertised as much on the internet as others may be, he is working very hard to do so. We ask that you would please keep this page on Wikipedia so that others may learn about Seth and his acting career on Family Matters, as well as his modelling career in Trinidad and Tobago. Thank you
- contested prod, restored
Speedy deletion
[edit]Hi! Hope you remember me. Could you plz. tell me if Chiranjeevi_Charitable_Trust article is worthy of speedy deletion? Thanking You, AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 06:43, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- commented
my article has been deleted?
[edit]hi, I created an article on wiki explaining the "name" of a freeware project online and giving some info about the project itself.
It has been speedy deleted for some reason by a bot.
Why? it is not spam at all and I also wrote the source link back to the where the project come from.
Since is my first post what i did wrong?
what I have to do to have the article undeleted? Thank you, Corradz. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Corradz (talk • contribs) 11:54, August 21, 2007 (UTC).
- commented on user talk-page
Signpost updated for August 20th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 34 | 20 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Request your attention
[edit]Plz. see Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention. Thanking You, AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 06:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- taken care of...
Deletion of page Bacn
[edit]I tried to create a new page for the low-priority e-mail term, bacn, but you deleted it. Could you please give me some pointers on how to create this page so that it's more acceptable to the wikipedia community? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Seriozha (talk • contribs) 21:45, August 22, 2007 (UTC).
- commented on user talk-page
Speedy Deletion tag
[edit]Hi! I've placed a Spam-Warn tag on the recently deleted Chiranjeevi Charitable Trust. Plz. see the page and decide accordingly, including removal of the tag. Thanking You, AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 05:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- has been taken care of...
Flex nibs
[edit]Hi you deleted this page and someone called Ivansanchez left a rather rude message calling me a spammer.
1. You didn't say what you thought was spamming in the article. I suspect I might have have put links in to the only two nibmeisters in the world who can still make flex nibs, and I remember there was a discussion of the very flex nib pens that can still be bought. ***It is impossible to have a worthwhile discussion of a subject like this with out such references. Fountain pen articles are full of them.***
2. Who did you think I was spamming on behalf of? The one pen I can remember mentioning is a model that is almost impossible to buy outside of Japan - the maker doesn't promote it at all; the other references to vintage pens and one man craftsmen businesses. Which entity do you think was paying for spam to be placed? Why was it giving equal prominence to its rivals?
3. Next, why didn't you delete what you think maybe spam, ***not an entire article***, leaving a discussion to explain your reasoning. Deleting painstakingly written information saying that flex nibs were more common in the 30's than later as "spam" is inane - do you really think that the 1930's marketing council is spamming wikipedia? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Umptious (talk • contribs) 14:42, August 23, 2007 (UTC).
- If I recall correctly, I left a db-spam template on the article about flex nibs. That was because a very short article, featuring a link to an external site, sets off my spam radar.
- Your radar is not always right.
So, propose speedy deletion because of blatant advertising. Sorry if the db-spam template sounds rude.
- The template is not rude only if used correctly.
- About (2): You were putting links to http://www.richardspens.com , a pen manufacturer, in several articles. Read WP:SPAM#How_not_to_be_a_spammer, point 5, last bullet.
- Binder is one of two living people who can make a true flex nib. Of course an article of flex nibs referenced him. So what? He also the best fountain info site on the web - as you would have found if you had bother to check the link. Binders site is probably the only one in the existence explaining nib flex and obliqueness, etc: referencing it in the articles I was writing was inevitable.
- The point you reference is a crude heuristic to be applied with intelligence: it is a blanket excuse for deleting without thinking. Re-read it and think about what it means.
- About (3): An article who was created with the "spammy" links, even if it has a couple of sentences of factual information, is a perfect candidate for speedy deletion.
- Regards, Ivansanchez 15:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- A link is not spammy if it is reasonably necessary. As said, Binder is one of two living people who can make a true flex nib. Of course an article of flex nibs referenced him. So what?
- The article had rather more than a couple of sentences of information. You could simply have deleted the reference to Binder and left the rest: you were too lazy. Let me refer you to:
"The best way to resolve a dispute is to avoid it in the first place.
Be respectful to others and their points of view. This means primarily: Do not simply revert changes in a dispute. When someone makes an edit you consider biased or inaccurate, improve the edit, rather than reverting it"
And God knows, deleting is much more extreme than reverting. EVERYTHING is lost.
I suggest that you read this and think about it. I'm going to restore the page as I remember it. I also want to know who to contact to arbitrate future disputes with you adn to discuss your behaviour in general. Admin status should not be used as a tool for vandalism or a crutch for people too lazy to edit properly.
I am going to re-write exactly as I remember it. I suggest that you DISCUSS anything that you think needs discussing. Btw - the market for flex nibs is minute: as the article saud (oops! someone deleted it) they're very hard to use. I'd be surprised if Binder makes a couple of thousand dollars a year from making them.
- commented on user talk-page
Request for protection
[edit]Please protect Telugu script as per my request here. Likely repeat of edit-war. RS-references being deleted. Thanking You, AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 06:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- has been taken care of...
Hi. I've been asked by its originator (a newbie) to help with this article that you deleted. I've viewed its last manifestation before speedytagging, at [1] While the external link was dodgy, per WP:EL, I'm not sure that the entire article fulfilled the G11 criteria. I'd be grateful if you reviewed your decision. Cheers. --Dweller 14:13, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- commented
- Lectonar: you complained that my message on the talk page concerning this matter wasn't friendly. Well, remember that I'm a new user and while to add content on quite a difficult subject I had found my work deleted without discussion and a very abrupt message left for me accusing me of spamming. By comparison, my reply was very restrained. I think you really DO need to adhere more to the wiki policy of discussion - and quite possibly what I now know to be the standard wiki spam message needs re-writing. Adding some tact won't affect spammers, and will help others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umptious (talk • contribs) 15:41, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
Also: I've used the Binder link again - there's an explanation why in Discussion on that page. As the new comment you left on my page saying that the article is "spammy" (without specifiying why) and implying that you resent being made to restore it - well, really: with an attitude like this, people *will* be brisk with you. There's more civility than putting a label on your page claiming you practice "Wikilove" Umptious 15:56, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.
[edit]Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 3, Issue 35 | 27 August 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Now that was fast
[edit]I like the speed of which you deleted my article, it must have been less than half an hour! It's incredible that stuff like that happens in such a big website. I'm not critisising your decision, it was a poor article, I'm just applauding your speed. P.S do you get paid for being an admin? Muffin Man 23 12:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Hi you deleted the above article as an A7. However, a claim to have videos on MTV, even a false claim, is a claim to notability, which is all an article needs to avoid CSD A7. Admins should not evaluate the truthfullness of claims to notability when deciding whether or not to delete via A7. Hoaxes are not speedy candidates. Dsmdgold 15:48, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
- I agree that this article would not survive AfD, which is why I have not and will not start a DRV. I also thought that the article should be deleted, which is why I placed a PROD tag on it. I feel fairly strongly that have plausible, but probably false, claims of notability should be handled this way. Dsmdgold 03:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's interesting, but I switch a lot of articles to PROD, and they are much more likely to have the PROD tag removed by someone who thinks they shold be speedied (as happened in this case), or by an admin patrolling the PROD list who speedies it, than they are to be removed by someone that thinks that the article should be kept. Anyway it had went this article would be gone by now, which is as it should be. Regards, Dsmdgold 20:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
I notice you un-protected Emily Dickinson with an edit comment of "time...". Can you explain why? The article seems like a good candidate for indefinite semi-protection as "Biographies subject to vandalism and/or POV-pushing that are not widely watchlisted" -- as I said when requesting semi-protection for it, it is subect to frequent vandalism by schoolchildren. -- Rbellin|Talk 16:34, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page