User:Lectonar/Archive 10
Tja
[edit]Wir treffen uns wieder... [1] Phgao 13:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Schön, dass Sie da sind. :) Phgao 15:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Achso, benutzt man Sie in der DE-wiki? Phgao 15:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ich glaub', dass Sie mir Duzen sollen, weil ich nur relativ jung bin, aber ich habe gelesen, dass wenn man in Deutsche Schule achtzehn Jahre alt ist, benutzen die Lehrer/innen "Sie". Stimmt dass? Phgao 15:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ich habe deine Email gekriegt. Ich schreibe 'nen jetzt zurück... *klassische Musik* Phgao 10:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ich glaub', dass Sie mir Duzen sollen, weil ich nur relativ jung bin, aber ich habe gelesen, dass wenn man in Deutsche Schule achtzehn Jahre alt ist, benutzen die Lehrer/innen "Sie". Stimmt dass? Phgao 15:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Achso, benutzt man Sie in der DE-wiki? Phgao 15:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
Manson page vandalism
[edit]At the discussion page of Charles Manson, I've just left a note headed "Vandalism." I'm bringing it to the attention of you and one or two other editors who have countered vandalism of the article.JohnBonaccorsi 23:40, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Gary Hayes
[edit]Why did the Gary Hayes page get yanked so quickly? Shouldn't that be up to a discussion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgt. bender (talk • contribs) 23:44, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
CUSTOM-FIT
[edit]Sorry, I tried to justify CUSTOM-FIT but I forgot to put the signature. The word represents a concept for a new manufacturing system (it is not only a machine, it is an overall concept: from capturing data to developing the product). We feel that we are not selling nothing we are just disseminating this way of manufacturing. --Customfite 12:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Need help!
[edit]Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. I would like to request a small favour from you. As you are an admin (and I am not), I would like you to move (or delete) this template to this template. Notice that these two templates have similar contents in them and the latter has the more accurate term of football. Thank you for your help and contact me when you are done (or fail to do for whatever reasons!) with regards to this. Thanks! --Siva1979Talk to me 16:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- taken care of
- Well, I have completed the "housecleaning" with regards to this! Now I can sleep in peace. --Siva1979Talk to me 16:43, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Ritz Carlton Enniskerry
[edit]I am struggling to understand why you deleted the page for the Ritz Carlton in Enniskerry, The hotel is notable and is a major employer in the town as well as being a major change in the landscape and reputation of a small area like Enniskerry. Also you have left other Ritz Carltons and deleted the one from wicklow, why is this. I have no connection to the hotel group but the hotel is becoming well known in Irish political circles and does merit note. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rorser (talk • contribs) 00:13, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Vinea soft drink article deletion
[edit]Please explain the reason! Nothing worse than clicking a link for Vinea soft drink in the "soft drinks by countries" wiki page only to be transfered to some ficticious scifi planet article. Stonufka 10:54, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- The subject has been solved and you correctly deleted dead link which
was created when an admin deleted the article which in turns was previously reedited by an user with the better way/idea about linking to the page. So all just a missunderstanding on my part before I was able to solve the puzzle. Thank you for your time. Stonufka 09:31, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
- yup, taken care of...
- A draft userspace article has been created. Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 November 8. Pdelongchamp 20:03, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
Need for German-English translation
[edit]Hey there, I seen that you are a native German speaker and I wonder whether you can please help me with translating the following sentence to English, objectively as possible: "Mögen wir zehnmal von Juden abstammen und ich im Princip noch so sehr für Gleichberechtigung der Hebräer sein, im socialen Leben sind mir Christen lieber ..." Best--Gilisa (talk) 12:25, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
- answered via e-mail
hi again; translation
[edit]Hi! How do I attribute interwiki translations? Thanks so much, and happy new year! :) Yodaat (talk) 02:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Sorry for being unclear; this is re: a comment that was left on my talk page
I've never seen attributions to the original language article on translated article pages; how do I attribute it? I don't see anything about it on the main translation page.
Thanks again, Yodaat (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Concerning:Günter Menges
[edit]I saw that you recently deleted the above article. Could you please explain why you deleted it? I'm trying to help out the user that created it, so if you would let me know, I could help explain it to him. Maybe if it wasn't libelous, could you possibly provide me with a copy on my talk page? That way I could set it up in a subpage for him, so he could work on it further until it's ready. Thanks for the help! Icestorm815 (talk) 18:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, thanks for doing that. Hopefully he'll be able to fix it up. I'll be sure to help him if he has any more questions. Icestorm815 (talk) 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Article about Günter menges
[edit]Would you explain why you deleated my article about Günter Menges? What is the reason that you did not even inform me about it? Krzysiulek (talk) 06:13, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
- both above answered on users talk-page; userfied
Global notability
[edit]I hope that you might be interested in participating in the discussion here -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 16:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
- complied
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "K"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "L"s through "O"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 00:02, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I've so to speak userfied my accountability and aim to stand by them as laid out; I always found your first ideas easy to use and to comply. Lectonar (talk) 16:36, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Deletion
[edit]Four categories are awating for deletion. I have created a category on Red Terror erroniuosly, but there are not adequate content for the category. Please delete this category. Thank you. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 15:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- deleted; we aim to please
Horizon International Education Center
[edit]Hi can you restore Horizon International Education Center a minute so I can see what I can do about it thanks ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ Talk? 12:13, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- userfied
Hi. Mmm I see what you mean and why it was tagged for deletion. Personally I think its no different to all of the other thousands of smaller school in the US and UK on wikipedia but I agree it needs assertion of notability. Perhaps Ekyaw could develop it sometime and try again adding some more info. Thanks that was a good idea regards ♦ Dr. Blofeld ♦ Talk? 16:35, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Sir Louis Mbanefo Article Deletion
[edit]You deleted an article I placed on Sir Louis Mbanefo, even though I had placed a Hang-on and had stated in the Talk page that I was the author of the web-based articles on The Blog subliminalcodesintext and www.helium.com which copyright you claim I violated. i am very concerned about this on largely on grounds of principle and would ask that you clarify how this can be resolved forthwith. Thanks very much- Edward C Keazor Seal67 (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
I would equally invite you to visit the website where the original article which copyright I am supposed to have violated is contained. I repeat I am the author and in simple proof, I have left you a message as the latest article. I look forward to hearing from you urgently http://subliminalcodesintext.blogspot.com/ Seal67 (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Project Rumble
[edit]I noticed you deleted Project Rumble while i was currently building it up. I think it should be brought back, As it was not intended to be a test page, And i was working on building it up to be equal to the content in other Wikipedia articles. And the article was also not a hoax, Info on it can be found on universalorlando.com, screamscape.com, orlandorocks.com and universalignited.com, I will post these sources if the page is brought back. Please restore the page.--Snowman Guy (talk) 17:58, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Sir Louis Mbanefo: Proof
[edit]I note that in response to my query as to deletion of this article, you asked me for proof. Well, if you read my last talk on this page, I referred you to the very website where the original article was i.e My Blog, where I had left you a very personal message titled "Sir Louis Mbanefo- Wikipedia" http://subliminalcodesintext.blogspot.com/. Can I ask is there any more conclusive proof, did you not see my last talk item. Well to make my point further I am going to amend the original article with a huge message, approved for publication on Wikipedia, will that finally satisfy you? Also can I say that whilst I appreciate the effort you are making in general, it does seem a little excessive that you are once again asking me for proof, in this instance since i asked you to refer to the page in my previous talk on this page and you obviously didn't or at least have not said that you are dissatisfied with the proof provided. Please can you respond urgently thanks. Seal67 (talk) 04:27, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Aliya-Jasmine Sovani
[edit]Hi there. I am an experienced editor who informally adopted the inexperienced user Jamierush. The version you recently nominated for speedy deletion was not just a recreation of the previous one. This user worked hard on the Aliya-Jasmine Sovani article (not that that in itself is a reason to keep), consulted me extensively via MSN IM, and was genuinely interested in creating an article that meets Wikipedia standards. I started out by having her prove notability to me, and then made sure she provided enough references. I helped develop a tone that seemed much less fancruft-y than the previous version that was deleted. While I can see how some people could still think that there is too little notability, we have gathered enough ammo that I think we deserve a second AfD debate. Please let me know your thoughts on this. Thanks! Tanthalas39 (talk) 21:58, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- answered on user talk-page; article restored.
- Since I left this, I learned that the author is essentially an agent for the subject of the article. Sigh. I'm going to abstain from discussion; feel free to nominate for AfD (or even speedy). Tanthalas39 (talk) 16:46, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Perlat Musta deletion
[edit]Hello, in the interest of not biting the n00bs, would you mind if we undeleted this article? It's not really an A7, because being a goalkeeper in a national soccer team for many years and being one of the most "famous" footballers of his country does constitute a plausible claim to notability, don't you think? Just needs sourcing and other cleanup, of course. Cheers, Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:55, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
- Nevermind. It seems the user isn't particularly keen on responding to constructive advice, so let's keep it out of the way until they show some more constructive initiative. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:32, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Germany Invitation
[edit]
|
--Zeitgespenst (talk) 17:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy Editing, Dustitalk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Project Rumble
[edit]Thanks for restoring the article for me to work on. I think i'm almost done with it, and i've added at least 8 rferences for the content in it. Could you look it over to make sure it's OK to become an official Wikipedia page? thanks.--Snowman Guy (talk) 22:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy Valentine's Day!
[edit]
A short/sweet little message, which I hope has made your day better! Happy Valentine's Day!!! Wilhelmina Will (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
Project Rumble Move
[edit]Alright, i moved it. Thanks for reviewing the page for errors. I'm still trying to find more verifiable proof to use for the article. Thanks.--Snowman Guy (talk) 17:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
deletion of "hechal Shlomo"
[edit]You deleted my page before I had a chance to write any content in it. i apologize for saving the page before I actually wrote any content. It was my first attempt at writing a page. I would appreciate it if you could let me write the article after all. Nkiviti (talk) 12:14, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Entitlement Theory cleanup
[edit]Hello,
I see that a long time ago (June 2005) you placed the 'cleanup-context' tag on Entitlement_Theory. I have tried to clean up and expand the article, as well as make the intro more understandable. As the person who requested it in the first place, what do you think? Does the intro have enough context to be clear to people who haven't read Nozick's book? If not I'm open to suggestions. Thanks! --Culix (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Wie geht's Lectonar? A while back you deleted this article, and I'm putting it back. Do you have a record of what you got rid of? I would like it. You put down 'blatant advertising' as a reason. It's quite an important company though (actually it's a lobby group). If you have a record, can you please post it on my talk page? Vielen Dank. :) Wikidea 16:03, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- Vielen Dank fuer die Antwort. Ich dachte es gab wahrscheinlich nichts besonderes an der ehemalige Seite. Aber es ist immer nuetzlich zu fragen. :) Wikidea 16:43, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Why?
[edit]I think that it is appallingly unfair that you deleted my band's page (Harrowdown). Due to me being a bit of a novice at these sorts of things, it took me 2 hours. This is meant to be a resource for free information. Yeah right.
- answered on users talk-page
Carlo Rizzi
[edit]I listed this for speedy, however on checking the history it was a vandalised page - originally about a character in the Godfather novels. I was correcting my mistake when you deleted. Any chance of bringing the article back to life? My apologies, look before I act in future --Richhoncho (talk) 10:57, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Can you delete this one? I can't find the right db tag, but the redirect is as unnecessary as Alucard (hellsing) (which you deleted). Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 20:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Found another redundant link, Aladdin (1992 film II). Thoughts? Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you. Also, would links like Piccolo (Character) and Piccolo (dragonball) be legit? These look like uncommon misspellings to me. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 22:33, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Can you also get rid of Vegeta GT and Children's literature (disambiguation)? The latter redirects to Children's literature. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 02:39, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Deletation of nicole s
[edit]Ok since you deleted the page, is it also possible if you to delete the page in the google search cus it usues my real name. thanx
User:G-rad —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.30.206 (talk) 10:33, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Wiki Project Question
[edit]Hi there again. I would like to start a wiki project for Universal Studios articles and content, any information or suggestions on how I can do this? Thanks.--Snowman Guy (talk) 03:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Aiken page vandalism
[edit]Hi. On July 4th you changed the protection level (Changed protection level for "Clay Aiken": time.... [move=sysop])[2]. Since then the article has been vandalised numerous times. Could you please change it back to what it was before. Maria202 (talk) 05:19, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Deleted article recreated
[edit]I just wanted to give you a heads-up that an article you had previously deleted (blatant advertising by an SPA) has been recreated, presumably by the same individual. -- Scjessey (talk) 14:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
China North International Shooting Range
[edit]there used to be an article called "China North International Shooting Range", but you deleted it back in 2007. I thought it would be a useful article to have as people who live in or visit Beijing may want to learn about the sport shooting options in Beijing, specifically this place.
If it was deleted due to pricing, then ok, we could remove the pricing.....
Any chance of un-deleting? --Chris (talk) 06:37, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Hi! I created a page and it was deleted :( uh, I thought it was a good page which could help mainly women. It gives information on a popular site which helps women on their body image which I believe is important especially to those who have been considering surgery and illegal injections which is many. It's important to let them know this is a reputable company which can really help them on a high level. It was my 1st time writing a wiki so I apologize if it wasn't to flavorful. I mainly thought I would post it due to the fact that my sister died due to surgery gone wrong (complications) amongst that subject. As well as I have used it and many general friends and it has opened a doorway to a actual alternative to body enhancement. Please write back. Thank you and blessed be. (Buttock enhancement) Blaxicana (talk) 10:03, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
Vegeta redirects
[edit]Can you delete the redirects Vegeta Jr., Vegeta Jr, Vegeta Junior, and Vegeta jr.? Their targets are invalid because they do not redirect to any helpful places. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:07, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
My user page
[edit]Thanks for the vandal revert. I was actually suggesting removing the ban on the user too, thinking maybe a good article could come of it. I guess not :( Paranormal Skeptic (talk) 22:59, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Heads up
[edit]User talk:Darkspots#My Deleated Article Darkspots (talk) 07:16, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Waffle Ass
[edit]Just curious on why my article on Waffle Ass was deleated and I was sent a message that it is inapropriate while Wikipedia has article on Anal sex. It was brought to my attention by "DarkHorse?" that it must be verifiable. So I typed in Donkey Punch in the search bar and hit go in Wikipedia and low and behold, there is an Article on Donkey punch. Now I am no kamura sutra wizard but I am pretty sure that donkey punch is,in fact, a made up term for a sexual act that doesn't exist and even states that in the article by saying (The term is not strictly defined or well-documented; at least one source attests to the move being "made up"). Now when I wrote my article I put in there that it is possible for this to be false but some people believe it is real.
So I guess I am just curious, does Waffle Ass not exist because you say it doesn't or is there a Wikipedia board of trustees that sits down and agrees on what is real or fake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sardoc8401 (talk • contribs) 10:33, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
Wayne Madden
[edit]Hi, would like to know why this article was deleted? It says it does not recognize why exactly Wayne is notable but he has done work in Leith FM (his radio programmes address is www.myspace.com/noiseupthursdays) and has interviewed people of note including members of Guns N Roses. He has also interviewed a lot of musicians and writes for a site called Daily Music Guide. You can find some of his work there. As a freelance journalist wayne needs press like Wikipedia to alert people to who he is, and just allow potential employers and people who apprichate his work, to learn a bit more about him. If we post some articles and reviews from his own work on the Wikipedia page could the article remain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.41.79.154 (talk) 08:30, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Bitte um Vermittlung
[edit]Hallo Lectonar
vor wenigen Stunden habe ich in einigen Artikeln der englischen Wiki diverse Korrekturen vorgenommen, die zum Teil von Benutzer User:Wiggy! revertiert wurden. Meine Änderungen waren wirklich nur gut gemeint und dienten zur Beseitigung von in meinen Augen elementaren Fehlern. Ich würde dies auch gerne dem betreffenden User mitteilen, aber meine Englischkenntnisse sind ziemlich lausig. Deshalb wende ich mich an Dich mit der Bitte um Vermittlung.
Gegenstand des Ganzen sind die beiden Artikel Sports club und Berliner FC Dynamo. Nach dem einzigen Kommentar von Wiggy! zu urteilen, hält er meine Änderungen für das Werk eines gewissen Kay Körner. Ich bin Mitglied der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia und habe dort unter dem Benutzernamen Sportfreak66 [3] einen eigenen Account. Mit der Person KK habe ich nichts zu tun, weiß aber wohl um dessen „Vorliebe“ für die SV Dynamo sowie seinen daraus inspirierten Beiträgen. (Nicht zuletzt deswegen weiß ich jetzt nicht, ob ich sauer sein soll oder nicht. Ich habe mir mit meinem Schulenglisch einen abgekrampft, um einen seriösen Beitrag abzuliefern und dann werde ich mit so einem Propagandisten in eine Ecke gestellt.;))
Jedenfalls möchte ich Dir meine Beweggründe für meine Änderungen erläutern, wäre schön., wenn Du diese dem User Wiggy! weiterleiten könntest:
- Sportvereinigung Dynamo
- war, wie der Name schon sagt, kein Sportclub sondern ein Verband von mehreren Sportclubs bzw. Sportgemeinschaften mit Sportclub-Charakter (z. B. SC Dynamo Berlin, SG Dynamo Zinnwald, SG Dynamo Luckenwalde etc.), in deren Sektionen verschiedene Sportarten betrieben wurden
- Seit 1966 fungieren die ehemaligen SC-Sektionen der SV Dynamo als selbstständige Fußballclubs (Berliner FC Dynamo, SG Dynamo Dresden).
- Seit Auflösung der SVD existieren einige der ehemaligen SC-Sektionen als selbstständige Sportclubs bzw. Sportvereine (z. B. Eisbären Berlin - Eishockey / SSV Altenberg - Biathlon, Bobsport, Rennschlittensport / 1. Luckenwalder Sportclub – Judo etc.).
- Das Sportforum Hohenschönhausen (war bereits im Artikel enthalten) war Heimstätte des SC Dynamo Berlin.
- Erich Milke war von 1953 bis 1989 Vorsitzender der SV Dynamo, aber mit Sicherheit nicht mehr bei der Auflösung der SV im Jahre 1990 (schließlich trat er bereits im „Wendeherbst“ 1989 von sämtlichen politischen Ämtern zurück und befand sich zudem ab Dezember 1989 in U-Haft.)
- war, wie der Name schon sagt, kein Sportclub sondern ein Verband von mehreren Sportclubs bzw. Sportgemeinschaften mit Sportclub-Charakter (z. B. SC Dynamo Berlin, SG Dynamo Zinnwald, SG Dynamo Luckenwalde etc.), in deren Sektionen verschiedene Sportarten betrieben wurden
Außerdem: Wenn man in diesem Artikel unter der Rubrik "Aufgelöste Sportclubs bzw. Sportorganisationen" die SV Dynamo aufführt, dann muss zwangsläufig auch ein Hinweis auf die Armeesportvereinigung Vorwärts mit rein.
- Berliner FC Dynamo
- wird in der Regel als BFC Dynamo bezeichnet, aber nicht als Dynamo Berlin (im Osten Deutschlands wird gemeinhin sogar das "Dynamo" weggelassen, was wahrscheinlich für einen Berliner aus dem Westteil der Stadt zur Verwechslung mit den dort ansässigen BFC Preussen oder BFC Viktoria 1889 führen würde)
- Die Bezeichnung "BFC Dynamo Berlin" ist einfach falsch, da der Name Berlin bereits in dem Kürzel BFC enthalten ist (das gleiche gilt übrigens auch für den Begriff "Hertha BSC Berlin", was bereits auf der betreffenden Diskussionsseite von einem anderen Leser angemerkt wurde)
- Sogenannte Fanfreundschaften zwischen Anhängern des BFC mit denen anderer Fußballvereine existieren nicht. Es mag vereinzelt lose Kontakte bzw. Bündnisse auf Ultra- oder Hooligan-Ebene geben, aber damit hat es sich schon. (Ich persönlich kenne BFCler, deren Freundinnen eingefleischte Anhänger vom 1. FC Union Berlin sind, aber damit lässt sich ja schließlich die im Tenor eher feindselige Einstellung zwischen beiden Lagern auch nicht wegdiskutieren.) Schlussendlich lässt sagen, dass Fans des BFC Dynamo besonders leidenschaftliche Rivalitäten zu den Fans der traditionellen EX-DDR Klubs pflegen (z. B. SG Dynamo Dresden, 1. FC Magdeburg, 1. FC Lokomotive Leipzig, FC Sachsen Leipzig, FC Hansa Rostock, 1. FC Union Berlin). Gegen die übrigen in Berlin ansässigen Fußballvereine, wie Türkiyemspor Berlin, Tennis Borussia Berlin oder Hertha BSC gibt es naturgemäß ebenfalls eine gewisse Abneigung. (Und überhaupt, von einer Fanfreundschaft zu den Herthanern zu sprechen – wie in der aktuellen Artikelversion aufgeführt - spottet jeder Beschreibung. Wenn überhaupt, dann existierte Anfang der neunziger Jahre mal eine lose Fanfreundschaft zwischen Hertha BSC und den Erzrivalen von Union Berlin).
- wird in der Regel als BFC Dynamo bezeichnet, aber nicht als Dynamo Berlin (im Osten Deutschlands wird gemeinhin sogar das "Dynamo" weggelassen, was wahrscheinlich für einen Berliner aus dem Westteil der Stadt zur Verwechslung mit den dort ansässigen BFC Preussen oder BFC Viktoria 1889 führen würde)
So Lectonar, das war soweit alles. Wie gesagt, ich wäre Dir dankbar, wenn Du User:Wiggy! zumindest überzeugen könntest, dass meine Änderungen in den beiden Artikeln ausschließlich der Verbesserung der Gleichen dienen sollten und einige Passagen in der jetzigen Form nicht korrekt sind.
Schon mal im Voraus herzlichen Dank für Deine Mühe und noch ein Schönes WE.
MfG, Robert --88.68.24.81 (talk) 00:38, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
- You need to be aware that the fellow who is asking you to do this is a user with a long history of abusive bevaviour here at en:Wikipedia and at de:Wikipedia that led to his being banned at both sites. You can pick up on some of his history at User:Fox53 or you can go back in the history of Berliner FC Dynamo to get a handle on his approach. He's strongly POV and uncooperative, so be mindful of dealing with him. If he was anything approaching objective and civil he wouldn't be here asking you to do his editing for him. Heads up. Wiggy! (talk) 23:45, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
KadmusArts Page
[edit]Subject/Headline: KadmusArts Page
Dear Lectonar, thank you for your explanation of the deletion of the KadmusArts page. I have rewritten the text completely, so it no longer infringes copyright, and recreated the page. Please let me know if you think any additional edits are required. Cbmaum (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Maltego article
[edit]Maltego IS a piece of software http://www.paterva.com/maltego/ is the website, why was the only article (seemlingly) on it deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zarathrustra (talk • contribs) 09:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 17, 2008 and before.
[edit]Because the Signpost hasn't been sent in a while, to save space, I've condensed all seven issues that were not sent into this archive. Only the three issues from November are below.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 42 | 8 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 43 | 10 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 44 | 17 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 11:15, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
Question about Sockpuppetry
[edit]I have recently found a user which may be using sockpuppetry. How can I start a disscussion on this matter?--Snowman Guy (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of the Selva Marine article
[edit]Hi.
Why did you delete this article so fast when the "hangon" tamplet was added? I don't see why it was marked as spam in the first place, the info didn't seem to me as a commercial..? All it needed was some work. Jørgen88 (talk) 15:52, 15 December 2008 (UTC)
Happy Holidays!
[edit]
Yupik would like to wish you a Merry Christmas, a Happy Chanukah, or whatever you may be celebrating at this time of year plus warm wishes for a good 2009!
Hyvää joulua ja onnellista uutta vuotta! Buriid juovllaid ja ráfálaš ođđajagi! Pyereh juovlah já luholaš uđđa ihe! Lahkoe jåvle jih buerie orre jaepie! Buorre javla ja buorre ådå jagev! God jul och gott nytt år! Hyveä roštuota! Hyveä rastavoa! С новым годом! -Yupik (talk) 20:43, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009
[edit]Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 45 | 24 November 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 46 | 1 December 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| ArbCom elections: Elections open | Wikipedia in the news |
| WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 1 | 3 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)
Margaret Saunders Ott
[edit]Hi. I wrote an article on Music Teachers National Association Teacher of the Year, Olga Samaroff Stokowski's assistant, first woman to receive a Master's Degree from Julliard, Margaret Saunders Ott. It was deleted by you. It would seem that those reasons are important enough to justify an entry. Is there any way to recover that article so I can see if your reasoning is valid? Thanks. Jemimasurrender (talk) 02:45, 9 January 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the answer and welcome, L. Is there any way to recover the deletion so I can continue to work on it? I wrote it on a friend's computer and didn't save it. Thanks for the help. J —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jemimasurrender (talk • contribs) 15:36, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 2 | 10 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
I couldn't find the version of this page on another project. Could you point that to me?Synchronism (talk) 08:54, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I saw that. I don't think they're the same.Synchronism (talk) 09:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- They were different titles. I don't read Georgian. From what I saw they didn't look similar. The Ka:wiki article is simply an infobox.[4] This had text.Synchronism (talk) 09:09, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Anyway, the AfT process may have resulted in more transparency if they are indeed the same. I'm not really hurt, I just wanted to know what the article was about.Synchronism (talk) 09:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can you transwiki the text to the ka:wiki?Synchronism (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- It appears to be a template or some other kind of protected page. I couldn't edit it even with my SUL. I added the content to the talk page. Sorry about the deletion review. I like to follow through with pages I come across doing RC patrol. Now what?Synchronism (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely enthused about this interaction either for a number of reasons, but I am sorry to start a deletion review. I'm also not the quickest at the keys either. To tell you the truth, for some reason much of my earnest activity at AfT gets a cold reception, so I tread carefully there now. I have been lambasted for suggesting CSDA2 there, even when I verified the article already existed elsewhere. Synchronism (talk) 10:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- It appears to be a template or some other kind of protected page. I couldn't edit it even with my SUL. I added the content to the talk page. Sorry about the deletion review. I like to follow through with pages I come across doing RC patrol. Now what?Synchronism (talk) 10:03, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
- Can you transwiki the text to the ka:wiki?Synchronism (talk) 09:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
I just wanted to apologize again for the premature DRV, and for not relaying a proper salutation at the beginning of this post. Best wishes to you, we'll gracefully meet again I do hope, Synchronism (talk) 10:27, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Deletion review for უმაღლესი ლიგა
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of უმაღლესი ლიგა. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Synchronism (talk) 09:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 3 | 17 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:50, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
RfA thankspam
[edit]
|
|
| Thank you for your participation in my recent RfA, which failed with 90/38/3; whether you supported, opposed or remained neutral.
Special thanks go out to Moreschi, Dougweller and Frank for nominating me, and I will try to take everyone's comments on board. Thanks again for your participation. I am currently concentrating my efforts on the Wikification WikiProject. It's fun! Please visit the project and wikify a few articles to help clear the backlog. If you can recruit some more participants, then even better. Apologies if you don't like RfA thankspam, this message was delivered by a bot which can't tell whether you want it or not. Feel free to remove it. Itsmejudith (talk), 22:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC) |
Denbot (talk) 22:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 4 | 24 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Delivered at 04:27, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)
Thanks!
[edit]Thankyou for your prompt reply! I shall have a good read of the page you linked to, much appreciated :) MilesAwayGirl (talk) 14:55, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for protecting BJ Penn page! Floodo1 (talk) 19:43, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 5 | 31 January 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
deleted page
[edit]I was going through the new pages, checking spelling, adding stub tags and such - I came across the IProperty.com Group page, and pasted the db-spam tag on it, looked at page history, and when I came back it was gone. I didn't do anything wrong did I? I looked at the deletion log, and as I understood it, you were the one who deleted it - so I'm assuming I did something right, and you just happened to be there that quick to delete the page. I've never tagged anything for delete before, and just want to make sure I didn't screw up. Thanks. — Ched (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Almighty? ... lulz. Well I appreciate what you guys do and all, but that may be stretching it jusssstt a little bit. Having filed my first 3O tonight and given the history of the other editor - I'm just a little on the jumpy side. Thanks. Have a good one. — Ched (talk) 08:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
Nick Hinton
[edit]You, and your other editors are blatantly ignoring the fact that this artist has had released albums on a major independent label and that can be verified at the AllMusic page I included in my article for this artist. You are also completely disregarding new editors, not allowing for new pages, showing prejudice it seems towards a page when there are 100000s of pages like it that meet less notability. You will most probably delete this too, or ignore it - but to be honest - it is admins like you and editors with trigger fingers like those who requested the speedy deletion in the first place that are doing a dis-service to the Wikipedia community. 3 years ago, this would not have happened, and an article would not ONLY be supported if an artist had had charted hits, etc. It would have supported the fact that this person EXISTS and is a member of the HUGE independent music community. To ignore this is simply, ignorant. Oh - and please don't quote me back the rules in your robotic Wikipedian lack of humanity kind of way. Thank you. Calmspeak (talk) 18:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- answered on users talk-page
Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 5, Issue 6 | 8 February 2009 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:19, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
LUNA TBWA
[edit]Do we really need to wait to see what they say on the translation page before removing an obvious advertisement by a company about itself (LUNA TBWA)? —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:39, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- OK, fair enough, I was relying on what I was able to make out without reporting it to everyone else. No, I don't speak Serbian (or Slovenian) but am familiar enough with Slavic languages to have figured out a little bit of it. I'll write a note on the needs-translation page. And clearly the article is about the author. —Largo Plazo (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- No problem; but just the fact that someone has a conflict of interest regarding the article does not always mean that it is advertising(it is only like that in about 95% of the cases :)) ). Nice assortment on languages you have there, anyway. Would you mind dropping in at WP:PNT from time to time?; I'm something like the residing admin over there, as it is such a niche, and we could always use more eyes. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar (talk) 13:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've taken a couple of looks at WP:PNT. Unfortunately, my vocabulary isn't up to par even in my best second language, French, and when I look at articles in that language that are of any interest to me, I feel daunted. But I'll keep looking from time to time. I did create the article Manifesto of the 343 from the corresponding article on French Wikipedia. —Largo Plazo (talk) 12:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Your recent decline for unprotection for GaGa
[edit]Can you please unblock this page, I wouldnt dierctly ask a another admin if I thought vandilism was going on.( Which it isnt.) No evidence was given. If cant can you please reduce the time to 2 weeks or so. Dance-pop (talk) 04:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- No. if the protecting admin does not unprotect it, I won't either; also. There are clearly problems with your edits to the article (edit-warring etc.). Lectonar (talk) 08:50, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009
[edit]
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 07:01, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Could you please explain more fully...
[edit]Could you please explain why you completed the deletion of Brandon Neely?
You placed an A7 on the article. I really don't see how this could apply. The man is one of the less than half a dozen Guantanamo guards who has given an affidavit on the abuse of Guantanamo captives he observed, and participated in. I believe this establishes notability.
I started the article, then spent an hour or so reading his affidavit, I would have finished fleshing the article out, if I hadn't been caught up in reading the whole document. It is quite long.
I know many of the wikipedia's quality control volunteers are overly hasty, and don't really bother looking at the articles they nominate, their references, and don't really give the topics the consideration they deserve, when they place tags. In my opinion that is what happend in this case.
Candidly, Geo Swan (talk) 13:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- I got your reply.
- I will thank you for userifying it to User:Geo Swan/Guantanamo/review/Brandon Neely.
- Thanks!
- I'd like to make a couple of comments about applying BLP1E, in general, and to this article.
- I have found what others consider "one event" can be very arbitrary. It seems to me that when others describe their concerns over articles that cover "one event" their concerns often innocently lapses from WP:NPOV.
- Neely volunteered to serve in Guantanamo in early January 2002;
- Neely experienced years of guilt and remorse over his role in abusing captives, and came forward, risking his army pension, to testify about what he witnessed and participated in, in December 2008.
- By my count that is two events. In my experience, when an observer's personal opinion is that an event is not important, or when they discount the credibility of the principals -- they are much more willing to conflate what are really multiple events, and call them a single event. In my opinion BLP1E is really a very flawed metric. These opinions that a series of event are not important enough to consider separately, or that the principals in the event(s) are not credible, is a personal interpretation. It is not based on some authoritative source, or collection of authoritative sources stating "these are not an important events". Sometimes we have to base our conclusions on our personal opinions. But, I think it is very important to recognize that is what we are doing, and not fool ourselves that our conclusion is an objective one.
- One wag made me laugh by asserting that Tony Blair didn't deserve an article of his own, that his article lapsed from compliance from BLP1E, and should be merged with George W. Bush, because no-one would ever have heard of him if he hadn't supported George Bush's Iraq policies.
- I started contributing to the wikipedia long before we had a BLP policy. I'll agree protecting private persons from libel and slander, and protecting the wikipedia from lawsuits over libel and slander are very important. Potential instances of libel and slander merit authorizing administrators to perform speedy deletions. But BLP1E got thrown into the policy. Personally, I think this was a big mistake. I don't think it belongs. Lapses from BLP1E do not put the wikipedia at risk of lawsuits over libel or slander, and they don't put private persons at risk. Concerns over "one event" are not emergencies. Concerns over "one event" should not be grounds for speedy deletion. In my opinion the policy should either make clear that a concern over "one event" is not grounds for deletion, or, preferably, BLP1E should be moved from WP:BLP to some other policy or guideline. In my opinion a concern over "one event" should be grounds for a tag, or at most, a {{prod}} -- not a speedy.
- I have found what others consider "one event" can be very arbitrary. It seems to me that when others describe their concerns over articles that cover "one event" their concerns often innocently lapses from WP:NPOV.
User page protection
[edit]Thanks for the user page protection that you gave me on Feb 9th. Unfortunately, User:Karmaisking's latest sock seems to be able to get around it. The sock is user:PyramidsOrFood?, and as evidenced from here, here, here, and here, this is a self-admitted sock of Karmaisking. I wonder if you could block him, as he keeps on harassing me on article talk pages and on my user page. Thanks, --LK (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Clarification of redirect policy
[edit]I tagged Kamal givens for deletion as per WP: Redirect, which states that such alternative capitalization are not necessary as per the "Francis Ford Coppola" example. Is there another reason for keeping this page? Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 18:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Jon burrow
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Jon burrow, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Non-notable, no reliable or verifiable sources.
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Bdb484 (talk) 08:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Mistagging and deleting page "death by wikipedia
[edit]I see you have deleted page "death by wikipedia" and tagged it vandalism. Please note that the phenomenon exists, that it has been named (and shamed) as such in the newspapers and media (note washingtonpost), that references for this are provided. I hope you will consider the evidence and will not remove the page in the future. It is clearly not vandalism, and if you want a page deleted, please go through a proper procedure - deleting it based on your own POV does not seem appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PrecioUS-USA (talk • contribs) 10:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Article that was deleted
[edit]My article on Matthew Fouts was deleted, is there any chance that I could get the code back for the page to take out the advertising. American chess players is an important category and he belongs there.
Thanks,
Juado1344
Matthew Fouts
[edit]User:Apples0002 would like a userfied copy of Matthew Fouts, an article you deleted. Could you please provide them with one? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 21:37, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Sonia Darrin
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Sonia Darrin, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia Darrin. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:29, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Article that was deleted
[edit]My article on Financial Advisors Directories was deleted. I would like to talk to you about why this could be a useful entry and how I can rewrite it to satisy the editorial guidelines. Thanks.
Mattwilson0501 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattwilson0501 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009
[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:
- Philosophers analyze Wikipedia as a knowledge source
- An automated article monitoring system for WikiProjects
- News and notes: Wikimania, usability, picture contest, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Lessons for Brits, patent citations
- Dispatches: Hundredth Featured sound approaches
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Islam
- Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.
Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 16:25, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Good deleting
[edit]... on ridiculous tutoring company advertisement. Thanks. --KP Botany (talk) 13:42, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I think there should be such a tag. But I think it should be called: speedy: articles that send you running to the vomitorium. Or maybe a category. --KP Botany (talk) 13:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- So true...
Charles Lindbergh
[edit]Thanks for your prompt assistance! FWIW Bzuk (talk) 15:24, 26 February 2009 (UTC).
- You're welcome, although you put your request in the wrong section...tststs. Lectonar (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Vitaly Potapenko
[edit]Hello. I see that you declined my request for semi-protection of the Vitaly Potapenko article. Can I explain the situation further? At least 11 IP addresses have been adding the same item of misinformation since mid-January:
- 12.30.206.21
- 12.167.254.18
- 66.94.91.226
- 70.217.56.228
- 75.196.115.0
- 75.219.0.211
- 75.219.0.232
- 75.219.165.199
- 75.223.97.66
- 96.11.189.125
- 216.37.197.242
I don't see the point of trying to leave warnings with all of these accounts. The person behind them knows damn well that what he is doing is vandalism. I've found the GQ article he cites in the library, and it doesn't support his claims at all. He actually gave me a page number once, but that page is an ad for DKNY watches.
I don't mean to rant at you, but I'm the only person who seems to be watching this article, and I'm sick of reverting vandalism every day. I really think semi-protection is the most sensible solution. Zagalejo^^^ 09:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- A couple of comments:
- The article was already semi-protected from January 28 to February 4, and again from February 8 to February 22. If it hadn't been semi-protected during those stretches, you'd be seeing a lot more reverts.
- From what I can tell, there hasn't been a constructive IP edit to the article since January of last year. Almost every IP edit since then has been related to the "meatballs" issue. (The only exception is this, which doesn't seem to be true, anyway.)
- At what point is semi-protection justified? The article has again been vandalized since I last spoke to you, and I don't think the vandalism is going to stop anytime soon. It's like we're in a staring contest here. I'll leave a warning at the talk page of the last IP to edit, but that probably won't accomplish anything in the long run. Zagalejo^^^ 18:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Why was my article deleted?
[edit]Please tell me why my article about Fat Loss 4 Idiots was deleted. There was no copyright infringement, as I used my own research to gather facts. Please explain. Thank you.
StephenHenderson (talk) 10:24, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009
[edit]This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:
- Books extension enabled
- News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
- Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
- Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:20, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Actually, all things considered, there was pretty light vandalism, if any. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)