User:Joyous!/Talk archive 18

RevisionDelete request on Gentrification

Hi - could you please delete revision 1210518382 by User:2601:181:400:36E:BCD1:5740:6D0C:F492 on Gentrification because of Wikipedia:Revision_deletion#2?

Thanks! Staraction (talk | contribs) 01:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Yep! Thanks for the alert. Joyous! Noise! 01:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

RevisionDelete request on User:Thank god everything is okay

Hi - could you please delete revision 1210520234 by User:Thank god everything is okay on their own userpage because of Wikipedia:Revision_deletion#2? They also have an active WP:AIV report.

Thanks! Staraction (talk | contribs) 01:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Done. Joyous! Noise! 01:48, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).

Administrator changes

Bureaucrat changes

SilkTork

Guideline and policy news

Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.

Technical news

The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)

Miscellaneous

The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ＊ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

5.216.78.14

Could you revoke their TPA? 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 01:56, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! 🇺🇲JayCubby✡ plz edit my user pg! Talk 01:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome! Thanks for the alert. Joyous! Noise! 01:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Ben Aldridge (actor)

Thank you for the range block. Given some of the old edits I've found [1], [2], [3], perhaps a far longer block would be appropriate. If they return in another form, I'll request page protection. Thanks again. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Point taken. I extended the p-block to 6 months. Nice sleuthing! Joyous! Noise! 03:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm about to ask at BLP whether the history of borderline defamatory edits merits rev/deleting. Is there a case for that? 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

I'll take a look; hang on! Joyous! Noise! 03:15, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Many rev/dels completed. Joyous! Noise! 03:26, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks so much. I usually trouble Drmies with that stuff--nice to hand the problem to a different administrator from time to time. Cheers! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Glad to help any time. Joyous! Noise! 03:33, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for all you do. Maliner (talk) 19:12, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you!! Joyous! Noise! 19:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

nomnomnom! Sebbers10 (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Joyous! Noise! 21:01, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Your block of Let the rain handle the win

It's likely this LTA, judging by edit summary & user page. Sleeper check may be needed, and global lock. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:02, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Should've removed before I tagged - but Special:Diff/1212900113 & Special:Diff/1212898530 will likely need revdel (per RD2) if page isn't deleted. Schrödinger's jellyfish ✉ 03:08, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Note: This notification was triggered due to your recent edits to Sweet Baby Inc.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:01, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Back in my day at Michigan the amount of fast food restaurants in Novi was horrific. I told people that living at USA would cause foreigners to gain weight from my experience, but people didn't believe it... nomnomnom :) AlphaBetaGamma (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:50, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Looks delicious. Joyous! Noise! 03:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	I keep going to revert something and seeing you've already beaten me to it, so here's a barnstar! Shaws username . talk . 22:53, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Don't worry. You get there first PLENTY of times. Joyous! Noise! 22:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Womp womp

I am not vandalizing I am spreading the truth 136.34.69.224 (talk) 01:03, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thanks for your rapid reviews of edits and rollbacks to prevent vandalism! TRL (talk) 02:13, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

147.0.99.202

Just a suggestion: If 147.0.99.202 vandalizes again after their block (they're on their second one), they should probably be indeffed. Just my suggestion. Thanks, Mseingth2133444 (talk/contribs) 16:44, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

I tend to go with increasing-length blocks, but I rarely indef an IP. Joyous! Noise! 16:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Not here

Just in case they come back and to explain the revision deletion here, the username and the edits were all references to a sex offender. Regards. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:39, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Ugh. Thanks for the info. Joyous! Noise! 20:42, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

@Daniel Quinlan: I know this isn't your talk page, but I want to say thank you so much. (It was me who made the request for the page protection in the first place). Pepper Gaming (talk) 01:04, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

You're welcome. Thanks for the request too. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 01:34, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Comment

Thank you for helping me get started on Wikipedia, Joyous!. Wasabi-The-LoreMaster (talk) 00:35, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Wasabi-The-LoreMaster

You are so welcome! I'm glad I could assist. Joyous! Noise! 00:39, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).

Administrator changes

Guideline and policy news

An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.

Technical news

The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)

Arbitration

An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".

Miscellaneous

Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hello, I'm 2A0E:CB01:10:1A00:146C:3E24:4E5C:2A09. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to History of the chair have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 2A0E:CB01:10:1A00:146C:3E24:4E5C:2A09 (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Please see [4]. The user whose revision you are restoring was previously blocked from editing that page due to disruption, and they were advised not to remove content without a consensus. 2A0E:CB01:10:1A00:146C:3E24:4E5C:2A09 (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Samf4u. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to John Hemsworth—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Samf4u (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

I think you'd best take a second look. :-). Joyous! Noise! 17:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

You got him!

Thank you, Joyous. I reverted one and then clicked my seat belt. This scholar here Special:Contributions/Your_username_is_public_and_cannot_be_made_private has to be the same person. When I saw 'the goat' I was 99% sure, but when I saw the heading that they sent you on your talk page, that sealed it. Thanks again. Bringingthewood (talk) 00:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Yep, he's the one. Special:Contributions/It_is_recommended_to_use_a_unique_pass. He left his signature blocked message. I reverted it. Bringingthewood (talk) 01:00, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

What the hell?

My edit summary said that I added a citation needed tag. Why did your hole check my edit instead of just trusting the edit summary?-Tumbling down noise (talk) 02:20, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Because people lie via the edit summaries all the time. Joyous! Noise! 02:24, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

Soorley terminated Brisbane River dredging

You have archived my edit because it was not perfect. (Read your own banner.)

The reason I did not include a citation in the update is because the source is behind a paywall that I cannot breach. (My record is hardcopy.) It was published in the Spectator Australia by Stuart Ballantyne, under the title ---Selling Queensland down the river---, 12 March, 2022, p.xii.

Here is the article for your erudition:

At a public meeting in Brisbane's Mt Crosby in 1996, the halting of dredging the Brisbane River was concluded. The Lord Mayor claimed that the "ugly dredgers were causing bank erosion". These dredgers with diminutive 300hp engines and 4-knot speed, were only capable of running with the ride and incapable of making a bow wave. The dredging was stopped, concluding over 100 years of effective acquisition of sand and aggregates. Brisbane then was the cheaptest place in the country to build a house due to the abundance of cheap concrete, bricks, pavers and tiles delivered into the city by the river. As the lone consultant appointed two days earlier by the Premier's Department I protested against this decision, explaining that replacing these two quiet, old 2,000-tonne barges with 160 truck movements (each with 400hp turbocharged diesels) a day was madness, endangered schoolkids, contributing thousands of cubic meters of truck exhaust gases daily and adding to road maintenance costs. I also concluded that the halting of the river dredging would shallow the river and exacerbate the danger of flooding. Simple cross-sectional area geometry, if you shallow the river the water will go sideways into the 'burbs. While dams can assist in slowing upstream water volumes in rain events, dredging is a basic tool for flood mitigation, confirmed by Brisbane based dredging expert Captain Kasper Kuiper. Yet the Lord Mayor hailed the decision to halt dredging as "a significant victory for Queensland". He said in 100 years, the Brisbane River had been "treated as a sewer and a mine". "No other capital cities in the world allow ugly dredgers into the heart of their city to mine their river", he claimed. Nodding their agreement was an environment minister, two mayors, and the Queensland Conservation Council head who said the agreement was "a major breakthrough for the rehabilitation of the river" and continued, "Clearly dredging is way out of line with community attitudes." These fools are probably perplexed that the Brisbane River, and every other river in the country, is still brown. Most river port cities in the world have active dredging programs with aggregate extraction as the lowest cost method of maintaining navigation channel depth and mitigating flood levels. Take a trip around Asia and you will see on the Pearl River in China, Saigon Rover in Vietnam and the Chao Phraya river in Bangkok, multitudes of low-powered grab dredgers that are anchored until the tide changes, as they, like the Brisbane river grab dredgers, are only capable of steaming with the tide. Fifteen years later in 2011, I shook my head in dismay watching the Brisbane River floods on TV. Even a 300-500mm difference in water levels makes a huge difference to some houses and businesses, and the subsequent enquiry unfortunately ignored the fact that continued river dredging could have dropped the flood levels. This 2011 flood claimed 38 lives and this recent one claimed 13 lives. The people who supported and made this decision to halt river dredging should hang their heads in shame. The upper Brisbane River was navigable 46km from the CBD by the Riverside coal barges until the Nineties. Recent declarations that the proposed Melbourne to Brisbane rail corridor was to end in Acacia Ridge rail terminal and then thousands of containers would be barged to the port, came to a sticky halt when the clever transport policy people discovered that the Brisbane River is now "way too shallow". Rail or road alternatives down to the port will be at least 40 times more expensive, and certainly louder. During the Nineties dredging debate, despite the state government getting royalties from every cubic metre extracted, dredging was halted. The navigation channel through to the Gold Coast at Jacobs Well, kept open by a sand extraction program, was abandoned, and vessels started to run aground again at anything below mid-tide. The program to attract luxury superyachts to the region suffered a knockback. Cruise ship companies are seeking new destinations and the year-round good weather of Queensland is a natural attraction. But even to anchor off some of the beautiful destinations and send their tenders ashore is being hampered by the ongoing demonisation of dredging by the Queensland government. Picturesque destinations such as Innisfail and 1770 are not accessible from the sea except for high tide, due to a lack of dredging at the river mouths. Cooktown has been listed as unsafe by marine underwriters, with the state program of a visit by a large dredger every five years. Frequent modest dredging is the best and proven way to keep a river mouth deep, and more importantly, safe! Five years ago, a video-link to nation-building initiative of extracting sand from river mouths for local use was circulated to the councils in control of 138 blocked river outlets around the nation. You can view it at [redacted because too much effort to add]. The reaction was overwhelmingly positive. Clean sand extraction at river mouths makes bar conditions safer for small vessels. Every year sees family members drown on the various bars around the nation when their cruiser or fishing boats capsize during transit. The Queensland Labor government's anti-dredging policy for the last twenty-six years has been an economic disaster for jobs and prosperity. Despite their claim of creating jobs, the present Labor government implemented policies that no only halted capital dredging around the state, but they halted transhipping and export mini ports through their ridiculous "Sunshine Ports Act". To clarify this, the analogy is a "Sustainable Milk Bar Act" where the state government owns the ten chemist shops in an emerging economy, and then passes an act to stop anyone else building or operating a milk bar. The successful mini port of Bing Bong in the Northern Territory, has exported more than $11 million of cargo in the last thirty years with one small transhipment vessel, and with royalties paid to the government of over $700m. The indigenous Mawa group are still co-owners of the transhipment vessel. But no such opportunity in Queensland. A proposal by the Hopevale Congressm just north of Cooktown, to export silica sand by barge transhipment was soundly rejected, despite the product being exported being the same as the stuff on the seabed at the proposed transhipment point making the remote possibility of pollution by spillage to be zero. One senior official stated to me, "That may well be Dr Ballentyne, but they could use that export point to handle coal!" The Greens/Labor paranoia about coal knows no bounds. Nowhere in our nation for the last 100 years will you find evidence of any environmental damage from dredging or transhipping. This Green/Labor philosophy and decisions totally ignore regional Australia, our traditional owners, the prosperity of the states and jobs for our kids and grandkids. 14.203.212.129 (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

I didn't revert the edit because it wasn't perfect. I reverted it because it was initially unsourced, and there was no way to tell that it wasn't your own opinion. The info you left above: the name of the paper, title, page number...that's the information needed to make a citation in the article. Joyous! Noise! 03:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

Help with Om Parvat

Hi thanks for always beating me to reverting vandalism. A recent change on Om Parvat tripped the edit filter. Seems to be a slow simmering edit war between the location of the mountain (India v. Nepal). I can't find the right diff to revert to anymore. Any help? Thanks, Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 05:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Classicwiki:Oh dear. I can't tell what is the "right" version, either. Joyous! Noise! 20:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

@Joyous! I added the {{Disputed}} tag because of the edit warring. Hoping that will prompt an editor to improve the article. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 21:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

112.198.200.136

Hello, I noticed that you have blocked 112.198.129.34, however it has a possible sockpuppet IP 112.198.200.136. Edits are very similar, and same messages on talk page. Please block this IP as well. Thank you. 2003 LN 6 03:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Hey thanks! Got it. Joyous! Noise! 03:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

Angry IPv6

Hi, Joyous!. The IP 2409:40c1:2b:f354:d0fe:cad9:e608:8a77 apparently didn't like being warned by you, see the filter log. I've blocked for a couple of days. Bishonen | tålk 18:39, 18 April 2024 (UTC).

Thanks! Joyous! Noise! 18:43, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me revert vandalism

Thanks, Joyous!, for helping me revert vandalism on Chinese Progressive Association (San Francisco). The user is now banned for 31 hours... Wait, you banned them! Thanks! and therefore...

@Joyous! You might want to redact a comment on User talk:66.232.249.68 after my "uw-vandalism3", it's not so kind of them... Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Absurd edit

This edit is absurd. The form $\varphi$ is less likely to be mistaken for $\varnothing$ or $\emptyset$ than is $\phi$ . Both $\varphi$ and $\phi$ are forms of the same Greek letter in different fonts. Both are commonly used in mathematics. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Your message would have been just as effective without the insult in the first sentence. I apologize for the error. Joyous! Noise! 00:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

That was not an insult; it was a description of that edit. It looks as if you were editing something on a topic that you do not know about. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:26, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Alyson Hannigan

Your help at Alyson Hannigan is appreciated. However, the page has been a vandalism target lately and a series of two days, one week and two weeks semi-protections have not been adequate in combating the vandalism. In fact, the two days you just put in is equal to the previous protection which expired literally one minute before the vandalism resumes. See the page's protection history. Can you please take a look at the protection history for this page and make the semi-protection longer? When deep inside (talk) 19:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Nope. Sorry. The level is adequate. Joyous! Noise! 19:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't understand your logic. Please explain. When deep inside (talk) 19:55, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Respectfully, these short term protections have NOT been adequate as proven by the page's edit history and protection log. If you do not explain your reasoning for the protection you put in I will protest/contest it at WP:ANI. When deep inside (talk) 20:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Sorry but I just came here to make the same request. (My request to extend it at WP:RFPP wasn't read.)

Since 16 March 2024, the article Alyson Hannigan has been semi-protected 6 times, each time accompanied by revdel of RD2 blp violations. In one of the 16 March edit summaries (can't link because of revdel), they wrote Hey User:Schazjmd here's a little secret. I'll NEVER give up. I'll keep doing this forever if I have to. When the protection expires, they start up again. The most recent protection, which you applied today, is only for 2 days. Please extend this protection for several months, maybe that will bore the vandal out of this obsession. Schazjmd (talk) 22:18, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for reverting all that vandalism by monitoring Recent Changes and banning users immediately! What do you use..... Twinkle! Same. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, Twinkle. Thanks for the kind note. Joyous! Noise! 20:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Help!

I have an article that I think slipped by you in the recent changes today, and I was wondering if either you or someone you know could help get it looked at and possibly deleted. It's one of the worst written I've ever read, and I'm not good enough to fix it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonnie_X_Clyde

Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Hi! It is, indeed, pretty bad. If you think the group doesn't qualify for an article under the provisions of WP:Band, then an AfD is the way to go. The article does at least TRY to assert importance, so it probably probably doesn't qualify for wp:csd. Joyous! Noise! 19:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Spore (2008 video game)

Sorry I changed your protection on this article, we apparently did it at the same time. ... discospinster _talk 04:10, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Not a problem at all. Joyous! Noise! 04:12, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

stuart cosgrove /daughter

hi joyous, you just told me that you deleted my comment on stuart cosgrove's page. fyi i am fiona branson the mother of ellis branson, stuart cosgrove's daughter, who was born in 1990, prior to his first marriage. stuart has signed her birth certificate - and i have a copy of that - and she knows her father, shirani, and her brother jack. i think it is very disrespectful - nay yet rude and inconsiderate - to fail to acknowledge her and claim she is the issue of his first marriage. she is not. she is his daughter, and i am her mother. 2A00:23C4:4583:7301:8449:589F:697D:5E02 (talk) 16:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

Request help with a revert.

This article may need to be reverted, but am not confident in which version I should go to. Think you could help? It is because of some mojor deletion in the

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badakhshan_Province

Thanks, Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:23, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

edit history.

Sorry, messed up the end of it.

Kingsmasher678 (talk) 17:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm really not sure. It looks like there was a tug of war going on in late March/early April regarding the origin of the name, but I honestly don't know enough about the sources to tell which is more reliable. Maybe start a conversation on the talk page? Joyous! Noise! 17:38, 26 April 2024 (UTC)

IP POV Pushing

Thank you for blocking, but since they keep changing IP's I've requested a bunch of page at RFPP. Could you look at those Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 15:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

That was a fast block

	The Speedshift Awards
	I put the first warning, saw it again in the Recent Changes and went to revert it again and saw you already had it done and blocked the IP. Nice work. I like Astatine (Talk to me) 15:14, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Now I am suspecting that Joyous! is a bot ^[sarcasm] The AP (talk) 16:15, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I have...minimal... patience when the vandalism is coming from bored schoolkids. Joyous! Noise! 16:18, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Lindale Texas

It seems you had changed some edits I made to the Lindale, Texas article. I understand your decision, however, To Kill A Mockingbird is not a banned book and Robert Isaac Minsky is a prominent resident there. I know these things because I am a resident here as-well. Please allow me to make the changes Sir Joyous Donkeystew (talk) 02:40, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

The information about Minsky is not appropriate for the encyclopedia. Can you find any sort of published source that the book isn't banned any more? Joyous! Noise! 02:46, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Of Course the Minsky information is appropriate. He’s practically a celebrity in the greater ETX area. Bringing outsiders up to slang that originated from him is not inappropriate at all. Although I have yet to find proof, I know that the book is unbanned because I read it in school, at Lindale. Donkeystew (talk) 02:54, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

New message from AquilaFasciata

Hello, Joyous!. You have new messages at AquilaFasciata's talk page.
Message added 14:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- AquilaFasciata (talk | contribs) 14:15, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Blocking me from another abusive editor

Hi, an editor refered me to you. I have been dealing with an extremely abusive editor for over a month now, and I want to distance myself from him in any way possible. Is there a way to block me from interacting with him? Thanks! (Also idk if this is the right place to ask) MemeGod ._. (talk) 16:59, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi, @MemeGod27:! As far as I know, there's not a "technical" way to ban interaction between users. There is such a things as an "interaction ban" but it requires the users to self-police and avoid each other. Joyous! Noise! 21:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Ah, okay. We made up last night, so I guess it isn't really relevant anymore. Thanks for your help anyway! :D MemeGod ._. (talk) 21:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Change desalt to really, source editing is currently bugged out on my phone lol MemeGod ._. (talk) 21:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2024

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).

Administrator changes

Nyttend

Bureaucrat changes

Nihonjoe

CheckUser changes

Joe Roe

Oversight changes

GeneralNotability

Guideline and policy news

Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.

Technical news

Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531

Arbitration

The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.

Miscellaneous

This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

A Question

Hi @Joyous!, I noticed an edit on White Front by 73.92.63.177 but I don't know if it should be considered vandalism or not. They mentioned "but it's not stated in the source" directly in the article. Is there a specific template to mention that, or should I verify and remove the content or add it somewhere else with {{citationneeded}}? Thanks! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

I would revert the edit with a {{uw-talkinarticle}} tag. Then verify the content. Maybe add the {{citationneeded}} if the material seems reasonable. Remove it if not, and if you can't find verification elsewhere. Joyous! Noise! 20:59, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Seems like 96.69.249.93 reverted the edit. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:01, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Question

User talk:Ankithreddy2029 is being used for advertising a book. The oddity is that the advertising is being done solely through the edit summary; never seen that before. I can't find any mention under WP:G11 or WP:ADS about promotion in the edit summary. What's the procedure in this case? Aguy777 (talk) 19:28, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Well, THAT'S creative. I'm going to remove the edit summaries, and leave a message that WP isn't to be used for promotion. Good spotting! Joyous! Noise! 19:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

I left a couple of message at the user's talk page, if you want to take a look. Joyous! Noise! 19:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for removing it! I'll be honest, I sat on it for a day in the hopes the user would eventually post something on their talk page that was blatant advertising, so I could just hit it with a CSD template and call it a day. Lol. Nothing happened of course, so I figured it would just be best to send it to you. Happy editing! Aguy777 (talk) 03:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

You're...

Admin? Oh, yes, you are. You just didn't mention that in your user page. Of course, you don't have to. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:03, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Yes. Hmmm. I thought I mentioned it on my userpage. I did a half-hearted userpage revamp a while back, and must have removed the mention and forgot to put it back. Rather like how I clean the kitchen. "Why is the blender in the living room?" Joyous! Noise! 21:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Wait, you did mention it. It's on the caption for the broom photo. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 21:10, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

VINDICATED! Except for the blender being in the living room. Joyous! Noise! 21:16, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Btw, thanks for revision-deleting that edit!

Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I didn't see the message at first because I was just looking at the categories to see if "Wikipedia Administrators" was there

. Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 20:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

why are you accusing me of vandalism

all i did was add pictures to ipad models its not vandalism i tried making ipads better 149.202.98.184 (talk) 21:39, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I've responded at your talk page, so we can keep the discussion in one place. Joyous! Noise! 22:04, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Revision Delete Request

I'm not sure if this is "allowed", but could you please redact content on User talk:97.89.73.170? Much appreciated! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:18, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I'm not condoning what was written there, but it doesn't really fall under the umbrella of what can be redacted (scroll down to the "misuse" heading). "Ordinary" incivility isn't a rev/del-able category. Joyous! Noise! 22:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

OK, thanks! Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 22:26, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Question

Wikipedia can’t even be used as a credible source. So why be so strict? 216.82.28.97 (talk) 01:29, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

I think Wikipedia is a worthwhile project, and I don't want to see it trashed. Joyous! Noise! 01:31, 8 May 2024 (UTC)