Template talk:Buildings and structures in Manchester, England

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles

Greater Manchester

This template is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles

Hello,

Just a note that North Tower (Salford) is not in Manchester. Can we look at finding a way to present this? -- perhaps with an asterix or some kind of marker/note? --Jza84 | Talk 01:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since the North Tower isn't in Manchester perhaps it doesn't belong on this template? Nev1 (talk) 16:46, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's in Manchester City Centre so no harm in it staying, there are a few non-Manchester buildings on the template but they are almost always referred to as being in Manchester e.g. Manchester's Trafford Centre. ^┌_Joshii^┐_└^chat_┘ 15:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We've also got the Trafford Centre and Old Trafford listed here. Same concern as before - do these belong here? If so, can we have an asterix or marker showing they are outside of Manchester? --Jza84 | Talk 01:45, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

18 months on..... I'm going to remove the non-Manchester entities. --Jza84 | Talk 22:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mills and warehouses

Sure this is a jest- Manchester had 1800+ warehouses by 1815- there are 94 cotton mills refered to in Williams and Farnie. List of mills in Manchester refers. 6 mills (or groups of mills)have individual articles and many more have substantial information included in the list that merit a link. Loads of work still to do- if you have an idle moment. --ClemRutter (talk) 16:51, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Red links

Lots of red links here in the past 6 months. It is worth pointing out that, in line with WP:REDNOT, "editors who add excessive red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or they may be removed from the template." Cnbrb (talk) 10:18, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ChrisClarke88: as you apparently added all the redlinks, are you hard at work writing lots of articles to fill the gaps? Cnbrb (talk) 20:29, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 April 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I noticed that in the Religious Grade I and II* listed Buildings section for Manchester the RC Church of St Mary 'Hidden Gem' in Mulberry Street is missing. This was designated Grade II* in 1963 (https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1197894) and has had a long wikipedia presence as The Hidden Gem. Please could you add this church to the list of Grade II* churches in the template. 31Emily (talk) 09:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- D'n'B-t -- 05:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]