The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the book Questioning Collapse was created as a critique of the claims made by Jared Diamond in his book Collapse? Source: "Their discussion expanded and developed into a volume that brings together archaeologists, cultural anthropologists, and historians to reanalyze and reinterpret Diamond's case studies and conclusions", Did They Fail? Could They Choose? - Science
Overall: Interesting article. Good to go. Hawkeye7(discuss) 19:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
One point: the opening sentence says "discussing how societies have developed, evolved, and collapsed". The lead then goes on to say "These authors showcased how each society did not collapse'. Suggest re-wording the initial sentence. Hawkeye7(discuss) 19:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
I've added "and whether they have or have not collapsed" to clarify that point. SilverserenC 21:56, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
I feel like that's a bit too quirky. :P And I do want the hook to explain its connection to Jared Diamond, since that's the entire point of the book in the first place. And will quite possibly get even more clicks than a quirky hook, since a lot of people would recognize the name. SilverserenC 01:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
@Silver seren:, @Hawkeye7: - The only mention of the book Collapse I see is in the lede and uncited. Am I mistaken? If not this will need to be fixed before the hook can be promoted. CSJJ104 (talk) 18:12, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
@CSJJ104: I've added the books into the background section, since that's the most relevant place that's already discussing them and their contents anyways. SilverserenC 18:18, 1 October 2022 (UTC)