This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
A fact from Questioning Collapse appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 October 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
... that the book Questioning Collapse was created as a critique of the claims made by Jared Diamond in his book Collapse? Source: "Their discussion expanded and developed into a volume that brings together archaeologists, cultural anthropologists, and historians to reanalyze and reinterpret Diamond's case studies and conclusions", Did They Fail? Could They Choose? - Science
Overall: Interesting article. Good to go. Hawkeye7(discuss) 19:54, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
One point: the opening sentence says "discussing how societies have developed, evolved, and collapsed". The lead then goes on to say "These authors showcased how each society did not collapse'. Suggest re-wording the initial sentence. Hawkeye7(discuss)19:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like that's a bit too quirky. :P And I do want the hook to explain its connection to Jared Diamond, since that's the entire point of the book in the first place. And will quite possibly get even more clicks than a quirky hook, since a lot of people would recognize the name. SilverserenC01:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]