The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 15:31, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
... that Obliskomzap People's Commissar for Public Charity V. L. Mukha resigned in protest over the dispersing of the First All-Belarusian Congress? Source: Ėntsyklapedyi͡a historyi Belarusi: M-Pud (in Belarusian). "Belaruskai͡a ėntsyklapedyi͡a" imi͡a Petrusi͡a Broŭki. 1993. p. 241. ISBN 9785857000731.
Overall: @Soman: Good article. Will have to AGF on the foreign language sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
@Soman: not trying to nitpick but the hook says he resigned in protest, but the article just says he "resigned over the break-up of the All-Belorussian Congress" and I unfortunately don't speak the language in the sources so I can't check what it says. Can you clarify in the article or the hook so that they match? - Aoidh (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't what is the problem. The article states "The First All-Belorussian Congress was finally convened in Minsk starting December 15, 1917. The congress adopted a declaration that recognized Obliskomzap solely as a provisional military entity, not as an organ of territorial government. In response the Regional Council of People's Commissars ordered the meeting to be dispersed in the night between December 17 and 18, 1917. [...] K. Smirnov replaced Mukha (who resigned over the break-up of the All-Belorussian Congress) as People's Commissar for Public Charity." --Soman (talk) 03:08, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Aoidh Are there still issues? SL93 (talk) 04:49, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
@SL93 and Soman: The hook says he resigned in protest, the article just says he resigned over it, not why. If the hook doesn't include the "in protest" part then I have no objections, but the article doesn't reflect that additional context. - Aoidh (talk) 05:45, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
"in protest" now added to the article. --Soman (talk) 12:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
AGF on the non-English sources supporting this, so good to go. - Aoidh (talk) 00:30, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
@Soman: Good article. Will have to AGF on the foreign language sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
@Soman: not trying to nitpick but the hook says he resigned in protest, but the article just says he "resigned over the break-up of the All-Belorussian Congress" and I unfortunately don't speak the language in the sources so I can't check what it says. Can you clarify in the article or the hook so that they match? - Aoidh (talk) 01:10, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
