Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Lord Adolphus FitzClarence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Evrik (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Lord Adolphus FitzClarence

Improved to Good Article status by Amitchell125 (talk) and Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 19:51, 6 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Lord Adolphus FitzClarence; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

  • Good article promoted 6 days before nomination, no copyvio, QPQ done, hooks could use an improvement, so here's an alt:
  • ALT2: ... that Lord Adolphus FitzClarence was said to be too slow due to his "most necessary appendage"?Source: Owen, Hugh (February 1997). "'I Shall Make Five Sons of Mine Fight for their King and Country': The Naval Sons of William IV and Mrs Jordan". The Mariner's Mirror. 83 (1): 41–61. doi:10.1080/00253359.1997.10656628.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: year (link)

Festucalextalk 13:20, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

@Festucalex: You can't approve your own hook per WP:DYKSG H2. A new reviewer is needed for ALT2, or you can strike ALT2 and approve one of the others. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 19:52, 3 June 2023 (UTC)
@Sojourner in the earth: I didn't think I was approving my own hook. I thought it was up to the promoter to choose which hook to use. Festucalextalk 02:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
The promoter can only choose from the approved hooks. You indicated that the nominator's hooks weren't good enough and proposed your own, so none of the current hooks have been independently approved. Sojourner in the earth (talk) 08:57, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
@Sojourner in the earth: Got it. Festucalextalk 10:38, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Post-close check: Taking all other DYK considerations as completed per the previous assessment, the newly proposed hook is supported directly by a source in the article, and that source includes the cited information. CMD (talk) 02:18, 19 June 2023 (UTC)