Template:Did you know nominations/Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene
Appearance
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 01:03, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene
- ... that Arnold Schoenberg composed a film score to no film? Source: Arnold Schoenberg to Otto Klemperer: "I find your suggestion about the abstract film, after thinking it over and over, very tempting indeed, since it solves the problem of this '[film] music to no film'." (Arnold Schoenberg and the Cinematic Art by Sabine Feisst, p. 98)
- ALT1: ... that the US premiere of the Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene by Arnold Schoenberg was intentionally ignored by the Los Angeles Times and resulted in the firing of its conductor? Source: "The last important premiere of one of Schoenberg's orchestral works in America before his arrival there was of Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene [...] in Los Angeles in July 1933. [...] For the Los Angeles Philharmonic and the Hollywood Bowl audience, it was their first encounter with twelve-tone music [...] and [Nicolas] Slonimsky met with harsh resistance. [...] [H]e was fired after the Schoenberg performance. The Los Angeles Times abstained from reviewing the concert [...] (Schoenberg's New World: The American Years by Sabine Feisst, p. 26)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Action Computer Enterprise
- Comment: QPQ to come soon.
Created by CurryTime7-24 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:47, 22 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Begleitungsmusik zu einer Lichtspielscene; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @CurryTime7-24: Good article. Just waiting on a QPQ. AGF on offline sources. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I'd like to donate a QPQ. Template:Did you know nominations/Action Computer Enterprise. BorgQueen (talk) 14:28, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @BorgQueen: I agree, This might make a good quirky hook.(?) after approval. Bruxton (talk) 18:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: Let me work on the QPQ right now. Hang on, please... —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 23:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @CurryTime7-24: No need. I've donated one for you, as you see above. BorgQueen (talk) 23:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- @BorgQueen: Thank you very much! Your kindness truly brightened my day. :) —CurryTime7-24 (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- @CurryTime7-24: No need. I've donated one for you, as you see above. BorgQueen (talk) 23:46, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the QPQ is done. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:59, 14 April 2023 (UTC)