The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 19:06, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
Interesting:
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Article is comprehensive. Meets eligibility criteria for DYK - recently promoted to GA. Written well and has no issues with tone etc. Article is extensively sourced but is sourced largely to offline sources, so, I will WP:AGF on that front. Earwig notes no Copyvio issues. However, I suspect that Earwig can not look at the offline sources. However, I will WP:AGF. Regarding the hook itself -- I am counting 10 naval ships in the infobox and I see them in the body as well. Some reviewers ask that the hook be introduced as a sentence in the article itself. Please see if that is possible. Not a hard and fast rule in my opinion. But, something to consider. QPQ done. Hook is reasonably interesting. All-in-all I am passing this with an AGF tag. Ktin (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Article is comprehensive. Meets eligibility criteria for DYK - recently promoted to GA. Written well and has no issues with tone etc. Article is extensively sourced but is sourced largely to offline sources, so, I will WP:AGF on that front. Earwig notes no Copyvio issues. However, I suspect that Earwig can not look at the offline sources. However, I will WP:AGF. Regarding the hook itself -- I am counting 10 naval ships in the infobox and I see them in the body as well. Some reviewers ask that the hook be introduced as a sentence in the article itself. Please see if that is possible. Not a hard and fast rule in my opinion. But, something to consider. QPQ done. Hook is reasonably interesting. All-in-all I am passing this with an AGF tag. Ktin (talk) 17:45, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
fixing. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)