Template:Did you know nominations/4x4 (song)

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 ^talk 21:15, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

4x4 (song)

(

)

... that, according to rapper Nelly (pictured), Miley Cyrus's song "4x4", from her album Bangerz, was "about having fun"?

Reviewed: Bernice Gordon, Maria Josefa Mujia, Ryan (film), Sir Richard Paget, 2nd Baronet, Hermann Müller (Idstein), Cirrus (song), Phil Fish (video game developer)

Created by EditorE (talk). Self nominated at 21:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC).

The picture should appear in the article. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 10:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Done 和DITOR E tails 18:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Do you have any QPQ? I searched back your past 3000 edits and as I see you nominated a bunch of articles but haven't reviewed any. The first ones were allowed to have none because you were new to DYK but now you owe reviews for Template:Did you know nominations/Bart Baker, Template:Did you know nominations/Jenny (Studio Killers song), Template:Did you know nominations/Hive (song), Template:Did you know nominations/Ode to the Bouncer, Template:Did you know nominations/Doin' It Right, Template:Did you know nominations/Magia (Shakira album). I don't know any rules that relieve you from reviewing other articles but correct me if I'm wrong. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 15:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

I think that is just complete baloney and is not a rule for DYK. But I could be wrong too 和DITOR E tails 18:32, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Excuse me? Wikipedia:QPQ#QPQ. First five nominations were for free but as my counting goes you are required to review at least 3 articles currently (but I will recount it and update if necessary). If you are not willing to do so then I've got no choice but to reject this nomination. Other reviewers were overlooked this criteria and made a big mistake when they let your previous nominations pass without a QPQ. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 19:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

UPDATE. You made 12 nominations and zero reviews. Subtracting the first five you are 7 away of making up for this nomination. Any chance you are able to equal this tally in the near future? Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 19:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

IDK. You know what, I'm considering withdrawing this nomination if I have to review DYK. 和DITOR E tails 20:09, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

It's not that of a big deal. Here you can find help for it: Wikipedia:Did you know/Reviewing guide. Anyway it's your choice just please make sure to drop a message here about your decision so we'll know how to close this nomination. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 20:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Alright I'll guess I'll review 和DITOR E tails 21:28, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

I think you made the right call. When you finished just upload the article names here. I added a "Reviewed" line just below your hook. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 21:37, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Does my comment at Template:Did you know nominations/María Josefa Mujia count as a review? 和DITOR E tails 23:01, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

I'm not 100% sure (I don't know the DKY rules for that). But why not continue and give it a full review? I side with you on this one that user EagerToddler39 was too harsh by rejecting the nomination at first glimpse. I also think that the work section isn't biased as it is well sourced. So I suggest if you give it a full review it'll count here as EagerToddler39's review seems to be a rushed one. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 23:18, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

If you have any more questions on other nominations feel free to use my talk page and I help you there if I can. I don't want to confuse other editors reading this nomination with too many off topic conversation. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 23:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

For the closing editor: this nomination becomes valid and good to go as soon as the QPQ reviews reach 7. All other criteria met, article and hook neutrality & length are fine, MTV is a reliable source and verifies hook. Pic is PD-Free from FlickR. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 09:43, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Good to go. Lajbi ^{Holla @ me • CP} 18:26, 8 January 2014 (UTC)