Jump to content

Talk:Zion Square

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Zion Square/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MusikAnimal (talk · contribs) 03:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


I will be reviewing this article. I'm a city type of guy so this should be fun. — MusikAnimal talk 03:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:
    B. Citations to reliable sources:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Concerns

[edit]
History
  • Jewish Colonization Association – let's link this
  • I am amazed that all of the "largest demonstrations" were reportedly 100,000 or near that in size. That be so, perhaps we could reword the sentence to something like: The largest demonstrations in the square included a May 2000 protest decrying the handover of Arab settlements adjacent to the Mount of Olives, a November 2000 protest against Ehud Barak's "policy of restraint" at the beginning of the Second Intifada, and a 2006 protest against the policies of acting prime minister Ehud Olmert, all of which drew around an estimated 100,000 people.
  • Under "Terrorist attacks": consider linking incendiary device. I wouldn't quite call it a common term and the concept I found interesting.
  • On July 4, 1975, ... killing 15 and wounding 77 – I found that the second provided reference (haaretz.com) supported all the claims in this sentence. The print source contains a broken link to Google Books. Up to you whether you want to ditch that source altogether, but if not you should remove or repair the link.
    •  Done I removed all the dead links here and elsewhere. Yoninah (talk)
  • Last sentence under "Terrorist attacks", The Jerusalem Post source link is dead. Again, the other two references seem to support the sentence, as far as I can tell.
Landmarks
  • Last sentence first paragraph: We should link "Old City"

This article was an excellent read. Beautiful, flowing prose, to say the least! I have zero doubt this will be a good article. Let me know what you think of the above concerns and we'll move forward with the promotion. — MusikAnimal talk 04:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


checkY Great work! This nomination has passed. Congrats! — MusikAnimal talk 22:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]