Talk:Zion Square/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MusikAnimal (talk · contribs) 03:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
I will be reviewing this article. I'm a city type of guy so this should be fun. — MusikAnimal talk 03:09, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citations to reliable sources:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Concerns
[edit]- History
- Jewish Colonization Association – let's link this
- I am amazed that all of the "largest demonstrations" were reportedly 100,000 or near that in size. That be so, perhaps we could reword the sentence to something like:
The largest demonstrations in the square included a May 2000 protest decrying the handover of Arab settlements adjacent to the Mount of Olives, a November 2000 protest against Ehud Barak's "policy of restraint" at the beginning of the Second Intifada, and a 2006 protest against the policies of acting prime minister Ehud Olmert, all of which drew around an estimated 100,000 people.
- Under "Terrorist attacks": consider linking incendiary device. I wouldn't quite call it a common term and the concept I found interesting.
On July 4, 1975, ... killing 15 and wounding 77
– I found that the second provided reference (haaretz.com) supported all the claims in this sentence. The print source contains a broken link to Google Books. Up to you whether you want to ditch that source altogether, but if not you should remove or repair the link.- Last sentence under "Terrorist attacks", The Jerusalem Post source link is dead. Again, the other two references seem to support the sentence, as far as I can tell.
- Landmarks
This article was an excellent read. Beautiful, flowing prose, to say the least! I have zero doubt this will be a good article. Let me know what you think of the above concerns and we'll move forward with the promotion. — MusikAnimal talk 04:31, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time to review it, and for your suggestions to improve it. Yoninah (talk) 21:52, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
Great work! This nomination has passed. Congrats! — MusikAnimal talk 22:00, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks! Yoninah (talk) 22:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)