Talk:Yardımlı

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Azerbaijan Low‑importance

	Azerbaijan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Azerbaijan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Azerbaijan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AzerbaijanWikipedia:WikiProject AzerbaijanTemplate:WikiProject AzerbaijanAzerbaijan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

On 21 March 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved to Yardimli. The result of the discussion was not moved.

Requested moves

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the pages, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 20:01, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

– The all Azerbaijani city names should be moved to English version as it is official versions. Moreover, there is more results in English version of it and some Azerbaijani letters is unknown to readers, which will cause problems in reading the article such as "Yardımlı". Xoncha (talk) Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/NovaSkola 09:41, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Ujar redirects to a dab page, not to the city. Dekimasuよ! 11:29, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - as with all the other moves. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Again, rather than single-handedly making an undiscussed bulk moves that affects the stable titling of an entire article corpus, note that recent English books do use Turkic diacritics for Azerbaijani the same as en.wp historically has done for all Turkic geo articles: [http://www.amazon.com/Lonely-Planet-Georgia-Armenia-Azerbaijan/dp/174179403X/ Lonely Planet Georgia, Armenia & Azerbaijan uses Turkic diacritics] [http://www.amazon.com/Azerbaijan-Excursions-Georgia-Mark-Elliott/dp/190586423X/ Azerbaijan Excursions Guide uses Turkic script] etc. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:45, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support. All titles should use letters from the English alphabet. Red Slash 00:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 21 March 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Elli (talk | contribs) 18:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yardımlı → Yardimli – Move to "Yardimli" per WP:UE/WP:COMMONNAME/WP:ENGLISH. Proof of anglicized name being the common name:

Results from Google News: Yardimli: 340 Yardımlı: 0

Results from Google Scholar: Yardimli: 121 Yardımlı: 74

Individual reliable sources referring to the city as Yardimli: Institute for War and Peace Reporting

This is the same name but an anglicized version. Unlike other small villages, this is a fairly large town, which has made a lot of appearances in English-language media, in most of which, "Yardimli" has been used much more, establishing its WP:COMMONNAME. I'd also like to ask the closing admin to give more attention to the arguments being made rather than the vote counts, as there are people who go over each RM and repeat unrelated policies as an "Oppose" argument. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 17:15, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as previous RM in 2014. Nothing has changed, it was a high-MOS choice for en.wp then, it's a high-MOS choice now. And frankly why replace short ı with long i, when the proposed change redirects here anyway? Readers don't panic at short ı in Turkish geo titles, why should they panic at a short ı just because this is over the border in another Latin-alphabet country Azerbaijan? This is a tiny stub on an insignificant town, it's doing no harm to anyone are perfectly findable using the same full font as every other Azerbaijan geo. This is a choice of en.wp relating to all Latin-alphabet geo articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)In ictu oculi (talk) 18:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The 2014 RM provided no sources and policies to back their change. Preferring an anglicized common name as advocated by WP:UE, WP:COMMONNAME and WP:ENGLISH over a scarcely used non-anglicized name isn't a MOS choice. We're not changing the name solely because it uses non-anglicized letters. The anglicized name is the common name as shown by WP:RS and WP:GOOGLETEST provided above. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 18:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please. WP:BADGER - and your response came so quickly that I lost some of my edit. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:52, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to people to clarify their misunderstanding of my RM intent isn't badgering (it would be if I was trying to make you change your vote) and it's quite ironic for you to mention it as you were doing the exact same thing few days ago here and here. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 18:53, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, I don't think the ratio of "English name" use is enough to override native name.--Ortizesp (talk) 20:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What? Did you even read the move request? It's not a ratio of "English name", it's a WP:COMMONNAME and a city's name being anglicized or not has nothing to do with the common name (and in this case, the anglicized name is the common name). — CuriousGolden (T·C) 20:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per In Ictu Oculi. No such user (talk) 14:12, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per arguments above. You needs to make consensus about it at MOS talk page. 36.69.52.139 (talk) 14:14, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a MOS issue and users trying to relate it to that are just WP:STONEWALLING at this point by copy-pasting the same message to each of the RMs. "Yardimli" is the clear WP:COMMONNAME. Combined with WP:UE and WP:ENGLISH, there's absolutely no proper reason provided by the other side as to why it shouldn't be used. — CuriousGolden (T·C) 14:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support. All titles should use letters from the English alphabet. Red Slash 17:49, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

that goes agaisnt WP:DIACRITICS —blindlynx (talk) 17:51, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose and support move of Yardimli District. It's probably a safe assumption taht the ngram is skewed beacsue not everyone has a the short i on thier key board and not that the long i version is the wp:commonname —blindlynx (talk) 17:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Yardımlı bayrağı.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:07, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]