Talk:Xiangyan Temple
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 14 November 2016
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus that as this is the only contender currently on WP for this title, there is no need to disambiguate. If further articles are ever written, we can rethink. — Amakuru (talk) 15:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
Xiangyan Temple (Xichuan) → Xiangyan Temple – Only Xiangyan Temple with an article. Timmyshin (talk) 19:00, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Is it certain that the English book mentions all refer to this one and not the one in Liulin County? In ictu oculi (talk) 19:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose. I get over 1,000 ghits for Xiangyan Temple [1] and they all seem relevant, and refer to many different localities. It seems unlikely that this particular temple is the primary topic for a name that is given to so many apparently notable temples. Andrewa (talk) 20:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- But we don't have articles for the other temples. How does the extra dab page help our readers? Timmyshin (talk) 04:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support. This is the only subject with an article. Apparently only one other "Xiangyan Temple" is even mentioned on Wikipedia, and that can be distinguished as easily by a hat note as by an unnecessary dab page.--Cúchullain t/c 18:04, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.