Talk:Willis Building (London)

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

term skyscraper

I thought a building has to be at least 40 floors to be considered a skyscraper? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 51.6.84.214 (talk) 15:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Willis Building

51 Lime Street is to be called The Willis Building (see British Land site) --DominicSayers 14:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Architect?

This article lacks something vitally important, who is the architect? Some dates on when it submitted a planning application, planning approval, ground breaking etc. would be useful too. Information on what happened before construction such as changes to design (if any) and problems with the planning could be added. These would all make this article a lot better - Erebus555 18:38, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, its Foster and Partners. One of Lord Foster's earliest projects was the original Willis Faber Dumas building in Ipswich. The information is already in the article, but you have to look very closely to find it - just click on the first image in the gallery. Keep clicking through until you get a full size version then scroll over to the information sign on the side of the building. The name of the architects are mentioned on that sign ;-) It would probably be a good idea to mention it more explicitly. -- 18:52, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Aha. Thanks for that. Foster and Partners are great architects. I will try and get other information on what I said previously to add to the article. - Erebus555 18:54, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Main photo

Nice pic, but I think a view from St Helens Square is needed as well, to show the proper "stepped" shape of the building, i.e. a side view. Wjfox2005 12:30, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nickname

The Willis Building is popularly known as the Prawn, though this has apparently not found favour with the architects;

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-35092279

Meltingpot (talk) 09:24, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have never once heard it be called that, until I read the BBC's "news" story. --TBM10 (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not, but I think this comment from the main article is relevant;

"It features a "stepped" design, which was intended to resemble the shell of a crustacean."

I'll leave it anyway; someone else can amend the article if they see fit. Meltingpot (talk) 14:25, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was not to move --Lox (t,c) 10:09, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Willis Building (London) → 51 Lime Street — Request move back to previous name. The building shares its name with a building in Ipswich which creates ambiguity as people looking for the Ipswich building are redirected here. The Willis Building should redirect to a disambiguation page to prevent redirecting to the wrong building.--Lucy-marie (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suppo®t as nom--Lucy-marie (talk) 16:19, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't care less one way or the other, but I would point out that 51 Lime Street is not exactly a unique name either. There's one in Liverpool, Nottingham, two in Sheffield, and doubtless dozens (hundreds?, thousands?) of other locations including two more in Central London. It's unlikely that many of these will be noteworthy enough to warrant an article, but there is a potentially massive disambiguation problem here. Emeraude (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. No evidence that the street address rather than the official name is the common name. And incidentally, there's been a disambig at Willis Building since July. Andrewa (talk) 06:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Andrewa. Rai-me 19:22, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Willis Building (London). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070505155338/http://www.mero-schmidlin.com/curtainwalling/50001limest_construction.htm to http://www.mero-schmidlin.com/curtainwalling/50001limest_construction.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]