Talk:Wax argument
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Changing name
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) Red Slash 04:43, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
Ball of wax example → Wax argument – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Greg Bard (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
I think this article should be moved under the name "Wax Argument" instead of "ball of wax example" as "Wax Argument" provides more information with less words and can be consider the correct heading for the thought experiment. As seen here: [1] Tradereddy (talk) 15:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- Support - I agree based on common usage. Greg Bard (talk) 20:40, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Categories:
- Start-Class Philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Philosophy articles
- Start-Class metaphysics articles
- Mid-importance metaphysics articles
- Metaphysics task force articles
- Start-Class epistemology articles
- Mid-importance epistemology articles
- Epistemology task force articles
- Start-Class Modern philosophy articles
- Mid-importance Modern philosophy articles
- Modern philosophy task force articles