Talk:Warner and Swasey Observatory

Warner and Swasey Observatory has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 4, 2006	Peer review	Reviewed
May 7, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
August 23, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

Astronomy Mid‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleveland

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Expansion

I noticed that this article was a stub and the author had assumed the Warner and Swasey Observatory was defunct. As this is not the case and only the Taylor Road facility was discontinued in use, I have revamped the article. Andromeda321 03:11, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the expansion! Actually, I didn't assume anything, someone else put in that it was defucted. Thanks again.--Rayc 05:24, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the best of all the stubs I planted back in December, so I'm sending it off to peer review then to Good articles. Thanks Andromeda!--Rayc 21:39, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I reformatted the article based on some suggestions from the peer review. Anything else to add? Andromeda321 00:04, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The first sentence of "Rooftop Telescope": "The Rooftop Telescope is a 9.5" refractor that was originally constructed in the late twentieth century by Warner and Swasey for their own use" is clearly incorrect, since they both died in the first half of the twentieth century.74.132.224.50 09:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Warner and Swasey Observatory/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
~~I made some copy-edits for clarity. The 'Lede needs expansion - it shoul summarize the entire article.~~ Y
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
~~There are many dead links. I fixed what I could with WP:CHECKLINKS. Overall the referencing is entirely inadequate. All that is currently covered is the discoveries made by the observatory.~~ Y
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~OK, We need more refernces to the history and equipment of the observatory. On hold for seven days. Major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)~~[reply]

I think everything was fixed. Ruslik_Zero 15:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, all seem fine now, thanks for your hard work. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Warner and Swasey Observatory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]