Talk:Warner and Swasey Observatory/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:09, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made some copy-edits for clarity. The 'Lede needs expansion - it shoul summarize the entire article. Y

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There are many dead links. I fixed what I could with WP:CHECKLINKS. Overall the referencing is entirely inadequate. All that is currently covered is the discoveries made by the observatory. Y

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • OK, We need more refernces to the history and equipment of the observatory. On hold for seven days. Major contributors and projects will be informed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

   I think everything was fixed. Ruslik_Zero 15:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

   OK, all seem fine now, thanks for your hard work. Keep GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:22, 23 August 2009 (UTC)