Talk:Videogum

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Videogum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Videogum. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Videogum at the Reference desk.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I've also been deleting excessive self-referencing and subjective opinions of features and functions. If we're going to maintain the relevancy of the page, we need to keep it factual, guys. Still wondering if we can get away with Trampoline Accidents though, I've removed it a few times but it seems to be OK as part of the mission statement without strike tags (it is based in fact on the About Us page of the site). --Luigi jespo (talk) 16:06, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate deleting what other people add but I think excessive self-references need to be curbed, i.e. Steve Winwood. I know its boring to only put the facts or w/e but its going to help this page stay on here. Ouest (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Searching for an article discussing the creation of Videogum, hopefully to reliably note several of the reasons for notability.--Luigi jespo (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SPEEDY DELETION?! IMPORTANCE OR SIGNIFICANCE?! IF Videogum isn't important, then I don't want to live! - lambnesio —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.171.20.11 (talk) 14:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We've established the site's relevance via mentions in prominent publications (The New York Times) and awards received by the site by popular, established organizations (ECNY for Comedy, Best Website in March 2010). Have we successfully demonstrated notability via the Wikipedia guidelines? --Luigi jespo (talk) 15:15, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated this as a DYK here. Allmightyduck  What did I do wrong? 17:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Videogum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:32, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]