Talk:VidIQ
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
[edit]I've rewritten the opening paragraph as I believe that it was the biggest (and only) part of this page that actually read like an advertisement. The history is purely factual and has sources to all claims. Another issue I can see being brought up is the reception section, however, I haven't found any sources that criticize vidIQ, but if someone does I'll be happy to improve the article. IanTEB (talk) 04:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
YouTube subscribers
[edit]Zaryab vlog official 59.103.62.166 (talk) 15:13, 30 October 2024 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class AfC articles
- AfC submissions by date/10 December 2020
- Accepted AfC submissions
- Stub-Class Internet articles
- Unknown-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Stub-Class Internet culture articles
- Unknown-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Stub-Class YouTube articles
- Low-importance YouTube articles
- WikiProject YouTube articles